You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to mod_python-dev@quetz.apache.org by "Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2005/04/07 23:38:16 UTC
[jira] Created: (MODPYTHON-45) Implement a fil-based session manager
Implement a fil-based session manager
-------------------------------------
Key: MODPYTHON-45
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45
Project: mod_python
Type: New Feature
Versions: 3.1.4
Reporter: Nicolas Lehuen
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 3.2.0
Right now mod_python comes with DbmSession and MemorySession. DbmSession performance can be pretty crappy if for any reason the anydbm module reverts to the dumbdbm implementation. With the current filesystems, implementing a file-based session manager should be easy and should perform well.
See the following thread : http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2005-April/017825.html
I've checked in a preliminary implementation based on dharana's work. We'll have to cope with a few issues (namely locking) before it is final.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Closed: (MODPYTHON-45) Implement a file-based session
manager
Posted by "Graham Dumpleton (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45?page=all ]
Graham Dumpleton closed MODPYTHON-45:
-------------------------------------
> Implement a file-based session manager
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: MODPYTHON-45
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45
> Project: mod_python
> Type: New Feature
> Versions: 3.1.4
> Reporter: Nicolas Lehuen
> Assignee: Nicolas Lehuen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2.7
>
> Right now mod_python comes with DbmSession and MemorySession. DbmSession performance can be pretty crappy if for any reason the anydbm module reverts to the dumbdbm implementation. With the current filesystems, implementing a file-based session manager should be easy and should perform well.
> See the following thread : http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2005-April/017825.html
> I've checked in a preliminary implementation based on dharana's work. We'll have to cope with a few issues (namely locking) before it is final.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Assigned: (MODPYTHON-45) Implement a file-based session manager
Posted by "Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45?page=all ]
Nicolas Lehuen reassigned MODPYTHON-45:
---------------------------------------
Assign To: Nicolas Lehuen
> Implement a file-based session manager
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: MODPYTHON-45
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45
> Project: mod_python
> Type: New Feature
> Versions: 3.1.4
> Reporter: Nicolas Lehuen
> Assignee: Nicolas Lehuen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2.0
>
> Right now mod_python comes with DbmSession and MemorySession. DbmSession performance can be pretty crappy if for any reason the anydbm module reverts to the dumbdbm implementation. With the current filesystems, implementing a file-based session manager should be easy and should perform well.
> See the following thread : http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2005-April/017825.html
> I've checked in a preliminary implementation based on dharana's work. We'll have to cope with a few issues (namely locking) before it is final.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Resolved: (MODPYTHON-45) Implement a file-based session manager
Posted by "Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45?page=all ]
Nicolas Lehuen resolved MODPYTHON-45:
-------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
This has been resolved a while ago. We now need some documentation.
> Implement a file-based session manager
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: MODPYTHON-45
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45
> Project: mod_python
> Type: New Feature
> Versions: 3.1.4
> Reporter: Nicolas Lehuen
> Assignee: Nicolas Lehuen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2.0
>
> Right now mod_python comes with DbmSession and MemorySession. DbmSession performance can be pretty crappy if for any reason the anydbm module reverts to the dumbdbm implementation. With the current filesystems, implementing a file-based session manager should be easy and should perform well.
> See the following thread : http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2005-April/017825.html
> I've checked in a preliminary implementation based on dharana's work. We'll have to cope with a few issues (namely locking) before it is final.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (MODPYTHON-45) Implement a file-based session manager
Posted by "Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45?page=history ]
Nicolas Lehuen updated MODPYTHON-45:
------------------------------------
Summary: Implement a file-based session manager (was: Implement a fil-based session manager)
> Implement a file-based session manager
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: MODPYTHON-45
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45
> Project: mod_python
> Type: New Feature
> Versions: 3.1.4
> Reporter: Nicolas Lehuen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2.0
>
> Right now mod_python comes with DbmSession and MemorySession. DbmSession performance can be pretty crappy if for any reason the anydbm module reverts to the dumbdbm implementation. With the current filesystems, implementing a file-based session manager should be easy and should perform well.
> See the following thread : http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2005-April/017825.html
> I've checked in a preliminary implementation based on dharana's work. We'll have to cope with a few issues (namely locking) before it is final.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-45) Implement a file-based session manager
Posted by "dharana (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45?page=comments#action_65715 ]
dharana commented on MODPYTHON-45:
----------------------------------
mod_python/Session.py from (mod_python_20050518163650.tar.gz) has a typo at line +364:
if timeout:
self._cleanup_timeout = timeout
else:
self._cleanup_timeout = Session.DFT_TIMEOUT
It should be:
if timeout:
self._cleanup_timeout = timeout
else:
self._cleanup_timeout = DFT_TIMEOUT
> Implement a file-based session manager
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: MODPYTHON-45
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45
> Project: mod_python
> Type: New Feature
> Versions: 3.1.4
> Reporter: Nicolas Lehuen
> Assignee: Nicolas Lehuen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2.0
>
> Right now mod_python comes with DbmSession and MemorySession. DbmSession performance can be pretty crappy if for any reason the anydbm module reverts to the dumbdbm implementation. With the current filesystems, implementing a file-based session manager should be easy and should perform well.
> See the following thread : http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2005-April/017825.html
> I've checked in a preliminary implementation based on dharana's work. We'll have to cope with a few issues (namely locking) before it is final.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: [jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-45) Implement a file-based session manager
Posted by Nicolas Lehuen <ni...@gmail.com>.
Well, Google gives good results for tutorials and FAQs - but make sure
you're not using Google Images ;-).
Regards
Nicolas
On 4/30/05, Jim Gallacher <jg...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA) wrote:
> > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45?page=comments#action_64138 ]
> >
> > Nicolas Lehuen commented on MODPYTHON-45:
> > -----------------------------------------
> >
> > OK, I have integrated FileSession into Session.py (it previously was in its own module FileSession.py). Now we need a bit of documentation...
> >
>
> I'm on it. Will post sometime Sunday. I haven't played with latex before
> though - can anyone point me to a good quick and dirty tutorial? Or I
> could just use google. :)
>
> Regards,
> Jim
>
Re: [jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-45) Implement a file-based session
manager
Posted by Jim Gallacher <jg...@sympatico.ca>.
Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA) wrote:
> [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45?page=comments#action_64138 ]
>
> Nicolas Lehuen commented on MODPYTHON-45:
> -----------------------------------------
>
> OK, I have integrated FileSession into Session.py (it previously was in its own module FileSession.py). Now we need a bit of documentation...
>
I'm on it. Will post sometime Sunday. I haven't played with latex before
though - can anyone point me to a good quick and dirty tutorial? Or I
could just use google. :)
Regards,
Jim
[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-45) Implement a file-based session manager
Posted by "Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45?page=comments#action_64138 ]
Nicolas Lehuen commented on MODPYTHON-45:
-----------------------------------------
OK, I have integrated FileSession into Session.py (it previously was in its own module FileSession.py). Now we need a bit of documentation...
> Implement a file-based session manager
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: MODPYTHON-45
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45
> Project: mod_python
> Type: New Feature
> Versions: 3.1.4
> Reporter: Nicolas Lehuen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2.0
>
> Right now mod_python comes with DbmSession and MemorySession. DbmSession performance can be pretty crappy if for any reason the anydbm module reverts to the dumbdbm implementation. With the current filesystems, implementing a file-based session manager should be easy and should perform well.
> See the following thread : http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2005-April/017825.html
> I've checked in a preliminary implementation based on dharana's work. We'll have to cope with a few issues (namely locking) before it is final.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Work started: (MODPYTHON-45) Implement a file-based session manager
Posted by "Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45?page=all ]
Work on MODPYTHON-45 started by Nicolas Lehuen
> Implement a file-based session manager
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: MODPYTHON-45
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-45
> Project: mod_python
> Type: New Feature
> Versions: 3.1.4
> Reporter: Nicolas Lehuen
> Assignee: Nicolas Lehuen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2.0
>
> Right now mod_python comes with DbmSession and MemorySession. DbmSession performance can be pretty crappy if for any reason the anydbm module reverts to the dumbdbm implementation. With the current filesystems, implementing a file-based session manager should be easy and should perform well.
> See the following thread : http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2005-April/017825.html
> I've checked in a preliminary implementation based on dharana's work. We'll have to cope with a few issues (namely locking) before it is final.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira