You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net> on 2005/05/01 14:38:29 UTC
[VOTE] Time format for access time.
Hi:
This is only related to the time format in the access output. Currently we
use:
Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3.612 seconds.
Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3 milliseconds.
New format (an ISO8601-like):
Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 0:00:03.612
Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 0:00:00.003
Please casts your votes.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
Re: [VOTE] Time format for access time.
Posted by Jeremy Quinn <je...@apache.org>.
On 1 May 2005, at 13:44, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>
>> Hi:
>>
>> This is only related to the time format in the access output.
>> Currently we
>> use:
>>
>> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3.612 seconds.
>> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3 milliseconds.
>>
>> New format (an ISO8601-like):
>>
>> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 0:00:03.612
>> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 0:00:00.003
>>
>
> Uh? Do you expect Cocoon to take hours to process a request?
>
> IMO we should choose between seconds and millis, but hours and minutes
> just add noise to this information.
We have a re-indexing process that takes around 6 hours :0)
regards Jeremy
--------------------------------------------------------
If email from this address is not signed
IT IS NOT FROM ME
Always check the label, folks !!!!!
--------------------------------------------------------
Re: [VOTE] Time format for access time.
Posted by Sylvain Wallez <sy...@apache.org>.
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>Hi:
>
>This is only related to the time format in the access output. Currently we
>use:
>
>Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3.612 seconds.
>Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3 milliseconds.
>
>New format (an ISO8601-like):
>
>Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 0:00:03.612
>Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 0:00:00.003
>
>
Uh? Do you expect Cocoon to take hours to process a request?
IMO we should choose between seconds and millis, but hours and minutes
just add noise to this information.
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies
http://apache.org/~sylvain http://anyware-tech.com
Apache Software Foundation Member Research & Technology Director
Re: [VOTE] Time format for access time.
Posted by Ugo Cei <ug...@apache.org>.
Il giorno 01/mag/05, alle 14:38, Antonio Gallardo ha scritto:
> Hi:
>
> This is only related to the time format in the access output.
> Currently we
> use:
>
> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3.612 seconds.
> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3 milliseconds.
>
> New format (an ISO8601-like):
>
> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 0:00:03.612
> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 0:00:00.003
>
> Please casts your votes.
-1
Reasons:
1) Don't fix what isn't broken
2) Why introduce a dependency on Commons Lang where there was none?
(see http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165499&view=rev ).
Ugo
--
Ugo Cei
Tech Blog: http://agylen.com/
Source.zone: http://sourcezone.info/
Wine & Food Blog: http://www.divinocibo.it/
Re: [VOTE] Time format for access time.
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net>.
On Dom, 1 de Mayo de 2005, 10:31, Stefano Mazzocchi dijo:
> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>> Hi:
>>
>> This is only related to the time format in the access output. Currently
>> we
>> use:
>>
>> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3.612 seconds.
>> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3 milliseconds.
>>
>> New format (an ISO8601-like):
>>
>> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 0:00:03.612
>> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 0:00:00.003
>>
>> Please casts your votes.
>
> why?
OK. Dropped. :-)
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
Re: [VOTE] Time format for access time.
Posted by Stefano Mazzocchi <st...@apache.org>.
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> Hi:
>
> This is only related to the time format in the access output. Currently we
> use:
>
> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3.612 seconds.
> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 3 milliseconds.
>
> New format (an ISO8601-like):
>
> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 0:00:03.612
> Processed by Apache Cocoon 2.1.8-dev in 0:00:00.003
>
> Please casts your votes.
why?
--
Stefano.