You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2005/01/08 00:05:06 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33006] New: -
[chain] Proposal: DispatchChain
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33006>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33006
Summary: [chain] Proposal: DispatchChain
Product: Commons
Version: 1.0 Final
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: chain
AssignedTo: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: sean.schofield@gmail.com
Building on Joe's idea of DispatchAction, this class would allow you to call
an entire chain using a dispatch method. The commands in the chain could be
either regular commands with dispatch methods or actual subclasses of
DispatchAction.
I can envision scenarios where it would be nice to have combine several
commands and call them all using a variety of dispatch commands.
Example: One chain that would populate an object in the context by reading
from the database and another chain that would store the values back to the
database. Each command in the chain could have a read() and write() method
and make use of common business logic such as communicating with the
appropriate DAO.
I'll submit the actual code and test case sometime this weekend. In the
meantime, I'm interested in feedback.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org