[jira] Updated: (ADFFACES-33) Facet display name vs. default handling

["Matthias Weßendorf (JIRA)" <ad...@incubator.apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Matthias Weßendorf updated ADFFACES-33:
---------------------------------------

        Fix Version/s: 1.0.0-incubating-core
    Affects Version/s: 1.0.0-incubating-core

> Facet display name vs. default handling
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ADFFACES-33
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-33
>             Project: MyFaces ADF-Faces
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Build
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0-incubating-core
>         Environment: Facet metadata
>            Reporter: Matt Cooper
>         Assigned To: Matthias Weßendorf
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 1.0.0-incubating-core
>
>         Attachments: adf-faces.patch
>
>
> The component facet metadata for the "display-name" was being defined as exactly the same value as "facet-name".  The "display-name" is an optional piece of metadata and serves as a custom term that development environments use to describe the facet during design time.  By default the development environment will build its own display name for the facet if display-name is not provided and will base this off of the facet-name entry.  Since both pieces are identical, we are not benefiting from having the "display-name" in our metadata files.
> In the JDeveloper development environment, the default display name is actually more descriptive and having the presence of display-name actually makes it so a less descriptive display name for the facet.
> Very shortly, I will attach a patch for the adf-faces directory where all of these unnecessary display-name entries are removed.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.