You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@cxf.apache.org by Kruntz <ca...@ottolina.net> on 2009/06/05 03:12:25 UTC

No binding factory for namespace http://apache.org/cxf/binding/jaxrs registered.

I'm trying to implement a restful http binding service with cxf 2.2.2 and
jetty embedded.
This is what I'm doing:

JAXRSServerFactoryBean sfSoggetto;
sfSoggetto = new JAXRSServerFactoryBean();
sfSoggetto.setResourceClasses(SoggettoService.class);
sfSoggetto.setResourceProvider(SoggettoService.class, new
SingletonResourceProvider(new SoggettoService()));
sfSoggetto.setBindingId(JAXRSBindingFactory.JAXRS_BINDING_ID);
sfSoggetto.setAddress("http://localhost:9000/");
sfSoggetto.create();

I keep getting this error:
org.apache.cxf.BusException: No binding factory for namespace
http://apache.org/cxf/binding/jaxrs registered.

This is the stack trace:
	at
org.apache.cxf.binding.BindingFactoryManagerImpl.getBindingFactory(BindingFactoryManagerImpl.java:91)
	at
org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.AbstractJAXRSFactoryBean.createBindingInfo(AbstractJAXRSFactoryBean.java:133)
	at
org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.AbstractJAXRSFactoryBean.createEndpointInfo(AbstractJAXRSFactoryBean.java:113)
	at
org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.AbstractJAXRSFactoryBean.createEndpoint(AbstractJAXRSFactoryBean.java:159)
	at
org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.JAXRSServerFactoryBean.create(JAXRSServerFactoryBean.java:83)

My code is almost identical to the "jax_rs/basic" sample, and I really don't
understand what I'm doing wrong...

Any takers?

Thanks in advance.
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/No-binding-factory-for-namespace-http%3A--apache.org-cxf-binding-jaxrs-registered.-tp23880630p23880630.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [CXF-2.2.2][JAXRS] No binding factory for namespace http://apache.org/cxf/binding/jaxrs registered.

Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.

On Tue June 9 2009 10:27:10 am Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so it looks like it's all sorted out then :-)
>
> > Do you think com.sun.xml.bind.v2.bytecode.ClassTailor.noOptimize applies
> > to my configuration only?

Possibly.   The "optimized" version basically generates some inner classes "in 
memory" using some byte code magic to access the fields and setters without 
the use of reflection.   That allows the GIT to compile them down and such 
which can be much faster.

HOWER, in some cases, a security manager can block that.   Also, since it has 
to end up calling defineClass on the classloader and such to add the classes 
to the classloader, if the classloader doesn't allow it, that can cause 
issues.    Thus, the flag to turn it off.

In CXF, we actually do similar things for JAX-WS/JAXB.   If you DON'T have 
wrapper types for you methods, we'll generate wrapper types in memory.   Also, 
we generate helpers to pull information in/out of wrapper types as needed 
without the reflections.     However, we also have Reflection based methods of 
doing it if the generation of the in memory classes fails.

Dan

>
> I honestly don't know. I think JAXB can be a very 'delicate' technology
> sometimes, despite being helpful often enough... May be some of the JAXB
> experts on this list can clarify, otherwise you might want to ping the JAXB
> users list.

>
> > (Should I add it to the small HowTo I'll write?)
>
> Yea, please do - it will be somewhat offtopic but in the context of your
> example it will fit well.
>
> cheers, Sergey
>
> > Sergey Beryozkin-2 wrote:
> >> I think it's a JAXB issue now. Can you post this class (as a similar
> >> sample class) ?
> >
> > Done. Attached.
> > Sorry for the italian...
> >
> > Sergey Beryozkin-2 wrote:
> >> May be setting
> >> -Dcom.sun.xml.bind.v2.bytecode.ClassTailor.noOptimize
> >
> > This solved the issue.
> > Now it works perfectly.
> > Do you think com.sun.xml.bind.v2.bytecode.ClassTailor.noOptimize applies
> > to my configuration only?
> > (Should I add it to the small HowTo I'll write?)
> >
> > http://www.nabble.com/file/p23943842/Soggetto.java Soggetto.java
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://www.nabble.com/-CXF-2.2.2--JAXRS--No-binding-factory-for-namespace
> >-http%3A--apache.org-cxf-binding-jaxrs-registered.-tp23880630p23943842.htm
> >l Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

RE: [CXF-2.2.2][JAXRS] No binding factory for namespace http://apache.org/cxf/binding/jaxrs registered.

Posted by Sergey Beryozkin <se...@iona.com>.

Hi Carlo,

finally, after a month or so, I added a new section :-)

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF20DOC/JAX-RS#JAX-RS-ConfiguringJAXRSservicesprogrammaticallywithoutSpring

I also updated a 'configuring JAXB provider' section with advice about using
'no optimize' property

cheers, Sergey


Sergey Beryozkin-2 wrote:
> 
> Hi Carlo
> 
> Thanks a lot, I will do
> Cheers, Sergey
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kruntz [mailto:carlo@ottolina.net] 
> Sent: 09 June 2009 17:38
> To: users@cxf.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [CXF-2.2.2][JAXRS] No binding factory for namespace
> http://apache.org/cxf/binding/jaxrs registered.
> 
> 
> Sergey,
> Since I don't have write privileges to
> http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/jax-rs.html, I attached a small blob of
> text that could be added after the "Configuring JAX-RS services
> programmatically" paragraph.
> Would you add it?
> (Please, feel free to modify it as you like.)
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> ---
> Carlo Ottolina
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p23946702/JAXRS%2Bwith%2BJetty%2Bembedded
> JAXRS+with+Jetty+embedded 
> -- 
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/-CXF-2.2.2--JAXRS--No-binding-factory-for-namespac
> e-http%3A--apache.org-cxf-binding-jaxrs-registered.-tp23880630p23946702.
> html
> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-CXF-2.2.2--JAXRS--No-binding-factory-for-namespace-http%3A--apache.org-cxf-binding-jaxrs-registered.-tp23880630p24261525.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.