You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jmeter-dev@jakarta.apache.org by Jonathan O'Keeffe <jo...@log-net.com> on 2001/08/29 22:35:46 UTC
Default name for WebTest elements created by Proxy
When you use the ProxyControl to record a test script, it creates a bunch
of individual Web Testing elements in your test plan, each of which has the
name "Web Testing". I'm thinking that this would be quite a bit easier to
read if the names were chosen to reflect the URL being sampled - perhaps
the terminal part of the filename, with or maybe without the file
extension.
Does anyone else think this would be a good idea, and, if so, any ideas on
how to do the naming? I'm thinking of complicated naming situations where
you're sampling a URL that has parameters and other stuff appended to it.
I think it would be pretty straightforward to implement this if we can come
up with a good naming system.
- Jonathan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Default name for WebTest elements created by Proxy
Posted by Mike Stover <ms...@apache.org>.
Actually, the proxy server did originally name the UrlConfig elements it
created with the Path attribute. I changed things to use Web Test
controllers, but didn't keep that bit of functionality accidentally. I'll
add it back in.
It looks like I won't be committing again until tomorrow, even though I've
fixed a few bugs and made changes based on people's suggestions today. Hope
you're all the patient sort :-)
-Mike
On Wednesday 29 August 2001 20:35, you wrote:
> When you use the ProxyControl to record a test script, it creates a bunch
> of individual Web Testing elements in your test plan, each of which has the
> name "Web Testing". I'm thinking that this would be quite a bit easier to
> read if the names were chosen to reflect the URL being sampled - perhaps
> the terminal part of the filename, with or maybe without the file
> extension.
>
> Does anyone else think this would be a good idea, and, if so, any ideas on
> how to do the naming? I'm thinking of complicated naming situations where
> you're sampling a URL that has parameters and other stuff appended to it.
> I think it would be pretty straightforward to implement this if we can come
> up with a good naming system.
>
> - Jonathan
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
--
Mike Stover
mstover1@apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org