You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by Mike Matrigali <mi...@sbcglobal.net> on 2011/02/15 19:12:18 UTC
10.8 triage - we should be updating both urgency and adding label
right?
10.8 triage - we should be updating both urgency and adding label right?
I think the queries are dropping the issue off the list if you just add
the label.
Re: 10.8 triage - we should be updating both urgency and adding label
right?
Posted by Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com>.
On 2/15/11 2:16 PM, Kathey Marsden wrote:
> On 2/15/2011 11:37 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> One possibility might be to bulk update the ones that have Urgency
>>> but no label to have a derby_triage_10_5_2 and then maybe I can
>>> write a query that will check for both urgency and the 10.8 label. I
>>> will see if I can do that.
>>>
> Ok. This is done. Thanks everyone on the feedback. Hopefully this
> will all make things easier next time around since we will have the
> queries set up and know exactly when issues were last reviewed.
>
> JDBC Bugs now shows complete on the Wiki but with 19 issues listed.
> Rick, could you unassign yourself or bulk update as you see appropriate.
Bulk-updated to low urgency.
Regards,
-Rick
>
> Thanks
>
> Kathey
>
>
Re: 10.8 triage - we should be updating both urgency and adding label
right?
Posted by Kathey Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net>.
On 2/15/2011 11:37 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
>
>>
>> One possibility might be to bulk update the ones that have Urgency
>> but no label to have a derby_triage_10_5_2 and then maybe I can write
>> a query that will check for both urgency and the 10.8 label. I will
>> see if I can do that.
>>
Ok. This is done. Thanks everyone on the feedback. Hopefully this
will all make things easier next time around since we will have the
queries set up and know exactly when issues were last reviewed.
JDBC Bugs now shows complete on the Wiki but with 19 issues listed.
Rick, could you unassign yourself or bulk update as you see appropriate.
Thanks
Kathey
Re: 10.8 triage - we should be updating both urgency and adding label
right?
Posted by Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com>.
On 2/15/11 10:30 AM, Kathey Marsden wrote:
> On 2/15/2011 10:12 AM, Mike Matrigali wrote:
>> 10.8 triage - we should be updating both urgency and adding label right?
>>
>> I think the queries are dropping the issue off the list if you just
>> add the label.
>>
> I could change the untriaged ones to have something like:
> project=DERBY AND Type = "Bug" AND Resolution = Unresolved and
> COMPONENT = JDBC AND fixVersion IS EMPTY AND Urgency IS EMPTY
>
> But it won't catch it if you forget the label.
>
> One possibility might be to bulk update the ones that have Urgency but
> no label to have a derby_triage_10_5_2 and then maybe I can write a
> query that will check for both urgency and the 10.8 label. I will see
> if I can do that.
>
> Meanwhile, yes, please mark both urgency and add the label.
>
> Thanks
>
> Kathey
>
>
>
Ah dear, well I forgot to adjust the Urgency field. It is not a driving
concern for me as the 10.8 release manager. I am chiefly concerned about
the bugs on these lists:
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenEightOneRelease#A10.8.1_Bug_Fixes So
far I don't see anything on those lists which qualifies as a Blocker.
Thanks,
-Rick
Re: 10.8 triage - we should be updating both urgency and adding label
right?
Posted by Kathey Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net>.
On 2/15/2011 10:12 AM, Mike Matrigali wrote:
> 10.8 triage - we should be updating both urgency and adding label right?
>
> I think the queries are dropping the issue off the list if you just
> add the label.
>
I could change the untriaged ones to have something like:
project=DERBY AND Type = "Bug" AND Resolution = Unresolved and COMPONENT
= JDBC AND fixVersion IS EMPTY AND Urgency IS EMPTY
But it won't catch it if you forget the label.
One possibility might be to bulk update the ones that have Urgency but
no label to have a derby_triage_10_5_2 and then maybe I can write a
query that will check for both urgency and the 10.8 label. I will see if
I can do that.
Meanwhile, yes, please mark both urgency and add the label.
Thanks
Kathey