You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by ji...@codehaus.org on 2003/12/02 22:46:56 UTC

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-122) Proposed refactorings for o.a.g.kernel.deployment.goal.*

The following issue has been updated:

    Updater: Ed Letifov (mailto:techtime@ic.ru)
       Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 3:46 PM
    Comment:
Since I have to operate from what I see in today's implementation the patch might seem somewhat ugly.
    Changes:
             Attachment changed to patch1.jar
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
For a full history of the issue, see:

  http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=GERONIMO-122&page=history

---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:

  http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=GERONIMO-122


Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
        Key: GERONIMO-122
    Summary: Proposed refactorings for o.a.g.kernel.deployment.goal.*
       Type: Improvement

     Status: Unassigned
   Priority: Trivial

 Original Estimate: Unknown
 Time Spent: Unknown
  Remaining: Unknown

    Project: Apache Geronimo

   Assignee: 
   Reporter: Ed Letifov

    Created: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 3:44 PM
    Updated: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 3:46 PM

Description:
I am under impression that some classes in o.a.g.kernel.deployment.goal.* can (should?) be refactored just a little to facilitate more reuse between them. IMHO an abstract class would be welcome in the hierarchy to reduce copy paste in the implementation (and also make tests simpler) 

I have some concerns about UndeployURL and RedeployURL that do not behave in the same way as other two: they do not normalize file-protocol based URLs and seem to accept null values for the arguments in the constructors. Is it in fact how it is supposed to be?



---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.

If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa

If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira