You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Wei-Che Wei (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/10/16 02:21:00 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (FLINK-4574) Strengthen fetch interval implementation in Kinesis consumer

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Wei-Che Wei reassigned FLINK-4574:
----------------------------------

    Assignee:     (was: Wei-Che Wei)

> Strengthen fetch interval implementation in Kinesis consumer
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-4574
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4574
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Kinesis Connector
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> As pointed out by [~rmetzger], right now the fetch interval implementation in the {{ShardConsumer}} class of the Kinesis consumer can lead to much longer interval times than specified by the user, ex. say the specified fetch interval is {{f}}, it takes {{x}} to complete a {{getRecords()}} call, and {{y}} to complete processing the fetched records for emitting, than the actual interval between each fetch is actually {{f+x+y}}.
> The main problem with this is that we can never guarantee how much time has past since the last {{getRecords}} call, thus can not guarantee that returned shard iterators will not have expired the next time we use them, even if we limit the user-given value for {{f}} to not be longer than the iterator expire time.
> I propose to improve this by, per {{ShardConsumer}}, use a {{ScheduledExecutorService}} / {{Timer}} to do the fixed-interval fetching, and a separate blocking queue that collects the fetched records for emitting.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)