Re: Too much going into 1.2 tree?

[Randy Terbush <ra...@zyzzyva.com>]

I can confirm that it has definitely crept into the 1.2 tree.




> Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> > 
> >     Erm, can anyone explain why the NT stuff is getting put into the 1.2
> >     tree?
> > 
> > % cvs update apache-1.2
> 
> I always make sure to use the -rAPACHE_1_2_X option. I haven't
> seen the below at all.
> 
> I also use -Pd as well...
> 
> Try
> 
> 	cvs update -Pd -rAPACHE_1_2_X apache-1.2
> 
> > cvs server: Updating apache-1.2
> > cvs server: Updating apache-1.2/cgi-bin
> >     :
> > cvs server: Updating apache-1.2/src/modules/proxy
> > cvs server: Updating apache-1.2/src/nt
> > P apache-1.2/src/nt/modules.c
> > P apache-1.2/src/nt/readdir.c
> > P apache-1.2/src/nt/readdir.h
> > cvs server: Updating apache-1.2/src/regex
> >     :
> > 
> >     I thought 1.2 was completely quiescent now (until the next set of
> >     undiscovered security fixes).
> > 
> >     I'm starting to have serious concerns about the value of branches
> >     versus creating separate modules..
> > 
> >     #ken    :-(}
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ====================================================================
>       Jim Jagielski            |       jaguNET Access Services
>      jim@jaguNET.com           |       http://www.jaguNET.com/
>             "Look at me! I'm wearing a cardboard belt!"