Re: OJB 1.0.5 release candidate 1 (unofficial)

[Ilkka Priha <ip...@norther.org>]

Thanks Armin!

Seems to work great with our app (MySQL-NT). The only found 
inconsistency with the previous version was that the default 
CopyStrategyImpl in ObjectCacheTwoLevelImpl is now final. We apply 
dynamic persistent Variables, which must be cloned during copying, and 
have implemented their special treatment in a subclass of 
CopyStrategyImpl. Now we have to copy the whole class instead of 
subclassing it to support both normal persistent objects and dynamic 
variables within the same strategy. Are there specific reasons to have a 
final copy strategy?

Regards,
     Ilkka


Armin Waibel wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have uploaded a first (unofficial) release candidate of the upcoming 
> OJB 1.0.5 version. The source distribution can be found here:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~arminw/
> 
> Please give it a go and report any bugs.
> 
> The source distribution contains a compiled OJB jar and the full 
> html-documentation (of the upcoming 1.0.5). Further information can be 
> found in the readme and release-notes files (recommended to read both 
> files).
> 
> If there are no bugs, I think 1.0.5 can be released within the next two 
> or three weeks.
> 
> regards,
> Armin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org

Re: OJB 1.0.5 release candidate 1 (unofficial)

[Armin Waibel <ar...@apache.org>]

Hi Ilkka,

Ilkka Priha wrote:
> Thanks Armin!
> 
> Seems to work great with our app (MySQL-NT). 

Thanks for testing!

> The only found 
> inconsistency with the previous version was that the default 
> CopyStrategyImpl in ObjectCacheTwoLevelImpl is now final. We apply 
> dynamic persistent Variables, which must be cloned during copying, and 
> have implemented their special treatment in a subclass of 
> CopyStrategyImpl. Now we have to copy the whole class instead of 
> subclassing it to support both normal persistent objects and dynamic 
> variables within the same strategy. Are there specific reasons to have a 
> final copy strategy?

Nope! Seems my code improvement goes over the top ;-)
I will fix this and revert CopyStrategyImpl to a non-final class.

regards,
Armin

> 
> Regards,
>     Ilkka
> 
> 
> Armin Waibel wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have uploaded a first (unofficial) release candidate of the upcoming 
>> OJB 1.0.5 version. The source distribution can be found here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~arminw/
>>
>> Please give it a go and report any bugs.
>>
>> The source distribution contains a compiled OJB jar and the full 
>> html-documentation (of the upcoming 1.0.5). Further information can be 
>> found in the readme and release-notes files (recommended to read both 
>> files).
>>
>> If there are no bugs, I think 1.0.5 can be released within the next 
>> two or three weeks.
>>
>> regards,
>> Armin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org