You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> on 2013/10/03 14:22:07 UTC
[PROPOSAL] Cleanup on HA website pages
Hi all,
following Claus' e-mail from yesterday, I started a serie of tests with
ActiveMQ 5.9-SNAPSHOT. For each test, I'm reviewing the documentation
associated to the components/features used in the test.
I'm now testing the HA, especially with a Master-Slave configuration.
Reviewing the website pages, I saw two pages that I think should be updated:
1/ http://activemq.apache.org/kahadb-master-slave.html
This page starts with "This is under review - and not currently
supported". It's a bit confusing for the users as this approach is the
prefered one for Master-Slave configuration ;)
I would like to remove the note. More over, this page doesn't provide a
very simple configuration, with just two brokers sharing the same KahaDB
directory (using NFS, SAN, NAS, or whatever).
For instance, this page could present something like:
Broker1:
...
<kahadb directory="/path/to/kahadb/store"/>
...
Broker2:
...
<kahadb directory="/path/to/kahadb/store"/>
...
WDYT ?
2/ http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html
This page is not complete (the "exemple" boxes are empty) and a bit
deprecated.
I would like to set the "shared-file-system-master-slave" as deprecated
and promote KahaDB as prefered solution. This page could be merged and
adapted to be included in the KahaDB one.
WDYT ?
Thanks
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Cleanup on HA website pages
Posted by Johan Edstrom <se...@gmail.com>.
I don't think it is a shared KahaDB at all, it requires
a shared filesystem since it relies on a lock in the filesystem.
On Oct 7, 2013, at 6:50 AM, Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> The AMQ documentation could surely need some love in some areas.
>
> For example the front page has still a ActiveMQ 4.x menu
> http://activemq.apache.org/
>
> Which IMHO clutters up the page etc.
> We could potential cleanup those old links and get 4.x pages removed etc.
>
> And on the long run, maybe AMQ 6 is the chance for us to reboot the
> documentation of AMQ and provide great docs.
>
> The docs for Apollo is in the source code and they look more modern
> and more up to date
> http://activemq.apache.org/apollo/
>
> Okay that was more a general observation. For the clustering docs,
> yeah sure. Maybe try to have Dejan / Rob / Gary review it, as they are
> up to speed on all the details of this.
>
> But a +1 from me for any doc improvements.
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> following Claus' e-mail from yesterday, I started a serie of tests with
>> ActiveMQ 5.9-SNAPSHOT. For each test, I'm reviewing the documentation
>> associated to the components/features used in the test.
>>
>> I'm now testing the HA, especially with a Master-Slave configuration.
>>
>> Reviewing the website pages, I saw two pages that I think should be updated:
>>
>> 1/ http://activemq.apache.org/kahadb-master-slave.html
>> This page starts with "This is under review - and not currently supported".
>> It's a bit confusing for the users as this approach is the prefered one for
>> Master-Slave configuration ;)
>> I would like to remove the note. More over, this page doesn't provide a very
>> simple configuration, with just two brokers sharing the same KahaDB
>> directory (using NFS, SAN, NAS, or whatever).
>> For instance, this page could present something like:
>>
>> Broker1:
>> ...
>> <kahadb directory="/path/to/kahadb/store"/>
>> ...
>>
>> Broker2:
>> ...
>> <kahadb directory="/path/to/kahadb/store"/>
>> ...
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> 2/ http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html
>> This page is not complete (the "exemple" boxes are empty) and a bit
>> deprecated.
>> I would like to set the "shared-file-system-master-slave" as deprecated and
>> promote KahaDB as prefered solution. This page could be merged and adapted
>> to be included in the KahaDB one.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Email: cibsen@redhat.com
> Twitter: davsclaus
> Blog: http://davsclaus.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
Re: [PROPOSAL] Cleanup on HA website pages
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi
The AMQ documentation could surely need some love in some areas.
For example the front page has still a ActiveMQ 4.x menu
http://activemq.apache.org/
Which IMHO clutters up the page etc.
We could potential cleanup those old links and get 4.x pages removed etc.
And on the long run, maybe AMQ 6 is the chance for us to reboot the
documentation of AMQ and provide great docs.
The docs for Apollo is in the source code and they look more modern
and more up to date
http://activemq.apache.org/apollo/
Okay that was more a general observation. For the clustering docs,
yeah sure. Maybe try to have Dejan / Rob / Gary review it, as they are
up to speed on all the details of this.
But a +1 from me for any doc improvements.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> following Claus' e-mail from yesterday, I started a serie of tests with
> ActiveMQ 5.9-SNAPSHOT. For each test, I'm reviewing the documentation
> associated to the components/features used in the test.
>
> I'm now testing the HA, especially with a Master-Slave configuration.
>
> Reviewing the website pages, I saw two pages that I think should be updated:
>
> 1/ http://activemq.apache.org/kahadb-master-slave.html
> This page starts with "This is under review - and not currently supported".
> It's a bit confusing for the users as this approach is the prefered one for
> Master-Slave configuration ;)
> I would like to remove the note. More over, this page doesn't provide a very
> simple configuration, with just two brokers sharing the same KahaDB
> directory (using NFS, SAN, NAS, or whatever).
> For instance, this page could present something like:
>
> Broker1:
> ...
> <kahadb directory="/path/to/kahadb/store"/>
> ...
>
> Broker2:
> ...
> <kahadb directory="/path/to/kahadb/store"/>
> ...
>
> WDYT ?
>
> 2/ http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html
> This page is not complete (the "exemple" boxes are empty) and a bit
> deprecated.
> I would like to set the "shared-file-system-master-slave" as deprecated and
> promote KahaDB as prefered solution. This page could be merged and adapted
> to be included in the KahaDB one.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cibsen@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen