You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@distributedlog.apache.org by Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com> on 2016/10/07 14:37:32 UTC
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up?
- KN
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says:
>> >
>> > On Repackaging
>> >
>> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged under
>> the
>> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator namespace. For
>> > example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar or a DTD
>> to
>> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
>> >
>> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to consider
>> > carefully how they will approach this transition.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though. This way
>> > applications written against the early release will have the right
>> > namespace already.
>> >
>> > -Flavio
>> >
>> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
>> > >
>> > > - Sijie
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to
>> under
>> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors?
>> > >>
>> > >> - Sijie
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Posted by Sijie Guo <si...@twitter.com.INVALID>.
Sorry, I didn't get the chance to take a look your pull request. There is
also a pull request (updating the libthrift version in core) which will
touch quite bunch of files. I am trying to figure out a plan for
accommodate these two changes. I will try to comment on your pull request.
- Sijie
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Any updates on this? Can we get this change in ASAP? so I can rebase my
> branches to the new package namespace. Appreciate any updates.
>
> - KN
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Khurrum,
> >
> > thank your so much for making this change. I will try to take a look and
> > get back to you soon.
> >
> > - Sijie
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Forgot the pull request -
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/41
> > >
> > > - KN
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Khurrum Nasim <
> khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I just sent a pull request - repacked the package from
> > > > com.twitter.distributedlog to org.apache.distributedlog.
> > > >
> > > > (basically just renamed files and sed/replace the package name)
> > > >
> > > > Let me know if it is okay.
> > > >
> > > > - KN
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Khurrum, I don't think anyone is working on this now. Feel free to
> > pick
> > > it
> > > >> up.
> > > >>
> > > >> - Sijie
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Khurrum Nasim <
> > khurrumnasimm@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > - KN
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim <
> > > >> khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > +1
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <
> sslavic@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
> > fpj@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >> > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation
> > says:
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > On Repackaging
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is
> > repackaged
> > > >> under
> > > >> > >> the
> > > >> > >> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator
> > > namespace.
> > > >> For
> > > >> > >> > example, Java source might be repackaged to
> org.apache.foo.Bar
> > > or a
> > > >> > DTD
> > > >> > >> to
> > > >> > >> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need
> to
> > > >> > consider
> > > >> > >> > carefully how they will approach this transition.
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release,
> though.
> > > >> This
> > > >> > way
> > > >> > >> > applications written against the early release will have the
> > > right
> > > >> > >> > namespace already.
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > -Flavio
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > - Sijie
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <
> > sijie@apache.org>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >> > >
> > > >> > >> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the
> > namespace
> > > to
> > > >> > >> under
> > > >> > >> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from
> > > mentors?
> > > >> > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> > >> - Sijie
> > > >> > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Posted by Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>.
Any updates on this? Can we get this change in ASAP? so I can rebase my
branches to the new package namespace. Appreciate any updates.
- KN
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> Khurrum,
>
> thank your so much for making this change. I will try to take a look and
> get back to you soon.
>
> - Sijie
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Forgot the pull request -
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/41
> >
> > - KN
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I just sent a pull request - repacked the package from
> > > com.twitter.distributedlog to org.apache.distributedlog.
> > >
> > > (basically just renamed files and sed/replace the package name)
> > >
> > > Let me know if it is okay.
> > >
> > > - KN
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Khurrum, I don't think anyone is working on this now. Feel free to
> pick
> > it
> > >> up.
> > >>
> > >> - Sijie
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Khurrum Nasim <
> khurrumnasimm@gmail.com
> > >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up?
> > >> >
> > >> > - KN
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim <
> > >> khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > +1
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <
> fpj@apache.org
> > >
> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation
> says:
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > On Repackaging
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is
> repackaged
> > >> under
> > >> > >> the
> > >> > >> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator
> > namespace.
> > >> For
> > >> > >> > example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar
> > or a
> > >> > DTD
> > >> > >> to
> > >> > >> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to
> > >> > consider
> > >> > >> > carefully how they will approach this transition.
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though.
> > >> This
> > >> > way
> > >> > >> > applications written against the early release will have the
> > right
> > >> > >> > namespace already.
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > -Flavio
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > - Sijie
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <
> sijie@apache.org>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the
> namespace
> > to
> > >> > >> under
> > >> > >> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from
> > mentors?
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> > >> - Sijie
> > >> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Posted by Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>.
Khurrum,
thank your so much for making this change. I will try to take a look and
get back to you soon.
- Sijie
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Forgot the pull request -
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/41
>
> - KN
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I just sent a pull request - repacked the package from
> > com.twitter.distributedlog to org.apache.distributedlog.
> >
> > (basically just renamed files and sed/replace the package name)
> >
> > Let me know if it is okay.
> >
> > - KN
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Khurrum, I don't think anyone is working on this now. Feel free to pick
> it
> >> up.
> >>
> >> - Sijie
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Khurrum Nasim <khurrumnasimm@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up?
> >> >
> >> > - KN
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim <
> >> khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > +1
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fpj@apache.org
> >
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On Repackaging
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged
> >> under
> >> > >> the
> >> > >> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator
> namespace.
> >> For
> >> > >> > example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar
> or a
> >> > DTD
> >> > >> to
> >> > >> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to
> >> > consider
> >> > >> > carefully how they will approach this transition.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though.
> >> This
> >> > way
> >> > >> > applications written against the early release will have the
> right
> >> > >> > namespace already.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > -Flavio
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > - Sijie
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace
> to
> >> > >> under
> >> > >> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from
> mentors?
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> - Sijie
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Posted by Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>.
Forgot the pull request -
https://github.com/apache/incubator-distributedlog/pull/41
- KN
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I just sent a pull request - repacked the package from
> com.twitter.distributedlog to org.apache.distributedlog.
>
> (basically just renamed files and sed/replace the package name)
>
> Let me know if it is okay.
>
> - KN
>
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Khurrum, I don't think anyone is working on this now. Feel free to pick it
>> up.
>>
>> - Sijie
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up?
>> >
>> > - KN
>> >
>> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim <
>> khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@apache.org>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Repackaging
>> > >> >
>> > >> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged
>> under
>> > >> the
>> > >> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator namespace.
>> For
>> > >> > example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar or a
>> > DTD
>> > >> to
>> > >> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to
>> > consider
>> > >> > carefully how they will approach this transition.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though.
>> This
>> > way
>> > >> > applications written against the early release will have the right
>> > >> > namespace already.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > -Flavio
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > - Sijie
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to
>> > >> under
>> > >> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors?
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> - Sijie
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Posted by Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>.
I just sent a pull request - repacked the package from
com.twitter.distributedlog to org.apache.distributedlog.
(basically just renamed files and sed/replace the package name)
Let me know if it is okay.
- KN
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> Khurrum, I don't think anyone is working on this now. Feel free to pick it
> up.
>
> - Sijie
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up?
> >
> > - KN
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim <khurrumnasimm@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says:
> > >> >
> > >> > On Repackaging
> > >> >
> > >> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged
> under
> > >> the
> > >> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator namespace.
> For
> > >> > example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar or a
> > DTD
> > >> to
> > >> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
> > >> >
> > >> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to
> > consider
> > >> > carefully how they will approach this transition.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though. This
> > way
> > >> > applications written against the early release will have the right
> > >> > namespace already.
> > >> >
> > >> > -Flavio
> > >> >
> > >> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > - Sijie
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to
> > >> under
> > >> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors?
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> - Sijie
> > >> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Repackaging the package namespace
Posted by Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>.
Khurrum, I don't think anyone is working on this now. Feel free to pick it
up.
- Sijie
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Is anyone working on repackaging? If no, can I pick this up?
>
> - KN
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Khurrum Nasim <kh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> + 1 (non-binding) for doing it asap
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > It isn't strictly necessary, here is what the documentation says:
> >> >
> >> > On Repackaging
> >> >
> >> > It is recommended - but not mandated - that source is repackaged under
> >> the
> >> > Apache namespace. There is no need to use the incubator namespace. For
> >> > example, Java source might be repackaged to org.apache.foo.Bar or a
> DTD
> >> to
> >> > http://dtd.apache.org/foo/bar.
> >> >
> >> > Existing open source projects moving to Apache may well need to
> consider
> >> > carefully how they will approach this transition.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > My suggestion is to repackage before the first release, though. This
> way
> >> > applications written against the early release will have the right
> >> > namespace already.
> >> >
> >> > -Flavio
> >> >
> >> > > On 10 Sep 2016, at 20:32, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Any suggestions from mentors for the first release?
> >> > >
> >> > > - Sijie
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Sijie Guo <si...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Does anyone know if it is required to repackage the namespace to
> >> under
> >> > >> org.apache for the first release? Any suggestions from mentors?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> - Sijie
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>