You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@taverna.apache.org by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> on 2015/06/11 16:48:03 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
Apache Taverna Language is a set of APIs for workflow definitions (SCUFL2)
and workflow inputs/outputs/run (DataBundle), as consumed and produced by the
Apache Taverna workflow system. The API includes support for working with
Research Object Bundles, and loading/saving Taverna workflows in different
formats.
The release candidates to be voted over are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-parent-1-incubating-RC2/
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-RC2/
SHA-1 checksums:
8199880048a59cde622e0caa24c3bc3d83bc5d5a
taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
7032e9d2be834f7c029aae562b62613481bf6939
taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
MD5 checksums:
7f9b107b9f1dc0407783ac0ad484d6ea
taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
35d3085b596b2dd4b30a0234259efade
taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
Build the release candidate in the above order, using:
mvn clean install
The release candidates correspond to the following git commits:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-maven-parent.git;a=commit;h=3ba669c78782d3fc3b548e2a512d201ee922b34a
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-language.git;a=commit;h=3340e2090e604b40ac0b88675f57c1d12032d060
Release candidates are signed with a GPG key available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/taverna/KEYS
A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetaverna-1003/
The changelog for this release is available from JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332247
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332246
Please vote on releasing these packages as:
Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
Apache Taverna Language 0.1.0-incubating
The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a
majority of at least three +1 Apache Taverna PPMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just
committers, please feel free to try out the release candidate
and provide your votes.
(Before anyone asks, RC1 was a release candidate tag I dropped as it
used an older Apache super-pom)
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
Note - PPMC members can't just throw a blind +1 vote, you need to
download, verify and test.
This release is just a Java library, the Taverna Language command line
tool is being developed by Manaka Madushanka as a GSOC project. You do
not need to test it API-wise (that should be done by the unit tests).
See check lists for testing:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice
Here's an example of testing I did for a different incubator release:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201502.mbox/%3CCAMBJEmU--FN1A2KSUpWgyKckTJ3j6HF5OES55S6kVSpbsCRFZw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
On 11 June 2015 at 15:48, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>
> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
>
> Apache Taverna Language is a set of APIs for workflow definitions (SCUFL2)
> and workflow inputs/outputs/run (DataBundle), as consumed and produced by the
> Apache Taverna workflow system. The API includes support for working with
> Research Object Bundles, and loading/saving Taverna workflows in different
> formats.
>
>
> The release candidates to be voted over are available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-parent-1-incubating-RC2/
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-RC2/
>
> SHA-1 checksums:
> 8199880048a59cde622e0caa24c3bc3d83bc5d5a
> taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
> 7032e9d2be834f7c029aae562b62613481bf6939
> taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> MD5 checksums:
> 7f9b107b9f1dc0407783ac0ad484d6ea
> taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
> 35d3085b596b2dd4b30a0234259efade
> taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>
>
> Build the release candidate in the above order, using:
>
> mvn clean install
>
> The release candidates correspond to the following git commits:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-maven-parent.git;a=commit;h=3ba669c78782d3fc3b548e2a512d201ee922b34a
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-language.git;a=commit;h=3340e2090e604b40ac0b88675f57c1d12032d060
>
>
>
> Release candidates are signed with a GPG key available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/taverna/KEYS
>
> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetaverna-1003/
>
> The changelog for this release is available from JIRA:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332247
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332246
>
>
>
> Please vote on releasing these packages as:
>
> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
> Apache Taverna Language 0.1.0-incubating
>
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a
> majority of at least three +1 Apache Taverna PPMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just
> committers, please feel free to try out the release candidate
> and provide your votes.
>
>
>
> (Before anyone asks, RC1 was a release candidate tag I dropped as it
> used an older Apache super-pom)
>
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes
> Apache Taverna (incubating)
> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
On 12 June 2015 at 19:28, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> It's important NOTICE be minimal. LICENSE can contain more material.
> Nowadays, "include the license" (in LICENSE) can be done with links.
Agreed on this approach - it reduces the viral effect of NOTICE.
I might have time to change this until next week.
> Like some of the N&L generators, they do simpel cases but for anythign else,
> it'll need proper files. Probably if you put a DISCLAIMER into git, it'll
> use that.
>> DEPENDENCIES is also auto-generated by apache-jar-resource-bundle.
You are right - that overrides it.
>>> Release candidates are signed with a GPG key available at:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/taverna/KEYS
> I really wish I had time to make a technical contribution to Taverna but
> that's unlikely. Please remove my key.
The KEYS was generated from https://people.apache.org/keys/group/taverna.asc
which seems to include you.
http://taverna.staging.apache.org/community/releasing#gpg-keys
I was hoping for not yet another thing to maintain manually..
Also https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain
says:
> Folks who vote +1 for release may offer their own cryptographic signature to be concatenated with the detached signature file (at the Release Manager's discretion) prior to release.
so a mentor who signs +1 could add his signature. I haven't seen this
used in practice, though.
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 12/06/15 19:28, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 12/06/15 16:50, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>> Well, this is my take on "release early, release often" (although it
>> is not early. Taverna Language is ready to be released, as we have
>> already discussed several times on this list. It's a foundation for
>> the rest of Taverna 3. There would probably be more releases of
>> Taverna Language later in summer/autumn, particularly to include the
>> Command Line tool from GSOC.
>
> Not sure what the point you're making is here. My comments are intended
> to move the process forward and as first-time checking is time
> consuming, I makde some comments as early as I could.
>
> This isn't a challenge-response setup - you are allowed to help the
> reviewers check the files!
>
> It's important NOTICE be minimal. LICENSE can contain more material.
See for example Marmotta.
The LICENSE is large, and NOTICE small.
>
> Nowadays, "include the license" (in LICENSE) can be done with links.
They choose into include the text, whereas other projects link to it.
> The CC licensed stuff basically says:
>
>> Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
>
> which an entry in NOTICE should suffice, but additionally here as well
> I added copyright headers if it was missing.
On reflection, I think that can go in LICENSE to keep NOTICE minimal.
Andy
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 12/06/15 16:50, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> Well, this is my take on "release early, release often" (although it
> is not early. Taverna Language is ready to be released, as we have
> already discussed several times on this list. It's a foundation for
> the rest of Taverna 3. There would probably be more releases of
> Taverna Language later in summer/autumn, particularly to include the
> Command Line tool from GSOC.
Not sure what the point you're making is here. My comments are intended
to move the process forward and as first-time checking is time
consuming, I makde some comments as early as I could.
This isn't a challenge-response setup - you are allowed to help the
reviewers check the files!
It's important NOTICE be minimal. LICENSE can contain more material.
Nowadays, "include the license" (in LICENSE) can be done with links.
> Going through, and as far as I can tell, none of the notices listed
> require their license text to be implicitly bundled or mentioned in
> such LICENSE. The individual 'foreign' files have corresponding
> copyright headers - see rat excludes in pom.xml
And you are not shipping anything else?
>
>
>
> The W3C license have:
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2015/doc-license
It seems by linking to be retrospective
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-documents goes there now.
>> The materials contained in the Site may be downloaded or copied
>> provided that ALL copies retain the copyright and any other
>> proprietary notices contained on the materials. No material may be
>> modified, edited or taken out of context such that its use creates
>> a false or misleading statement or impression as to the positions,
>> statements or actions of W3C.
From that text alone, I don't think that needs an entry in NOTICE - it
says that the original materials need to retain any copyright and any
other proprietary notices so where the original file is unchanged, there
is no need to be in NOTICE.
It's from the document license that there is:
"""
We request that authorship attribution be provided in any software
"""
and that suggests an entry in NOTICE.
> The only modifications to W3C files have been to *add* their copyright
> headers where it was just implicit from their parent specification,
always tricky when the input materials - I have seen LICENSE_README
and/or NOTICE files in the directories where a lot of W3C files are.
> e.g. compare http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd (in the http tar-pit) and
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/blob/master/taverna-scufl2-schemas/src/main/resources/org/apache/taverna/scufl2/rdfxml/xsd/xml.xsd
>
>
> The CC licensed stuff basically says:
>
>> Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
>
> which an entry in NOTICE should suffice, but additionally here as well
> I added copyright headers if it was missing.
>
> https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode says:
>
>> You must keep intact all notices that refer to this License and to the disclaimer of warranties with every copy of the Work You Distribute or Publicly Perform. When You Distribute or Publicly Perform the Work, You may not impose any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License. This Section 4(a) applies to the Work as incorporated in a Collection, but this does not require the Collection apart from the Work itself to be made subject to the terms of this License.
>
> Here the Collection is the taverna-language source zip.
>
>
> The DISCLAIMER is auto-generated by
>
> <resourceBundle>org.apache:apache-incubator-disclaimer-resource-bundle:1.1</resourceBundle>
>
> the template picks up the <name> from pom.xml
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-maven-parent/blob/master/pom.xml#L278
Never trust the machines!
> Presumably the problem here is that we have multiple top-level
> projects. So should all the projects have the same DISCLAIMER with
> just "Apache Taverna is an effort .." instead?
Yes.
Like some of the N&L generators, they do simpel cases but for anythign
else, it'll need proper files. Probably if you put a DISCLAIMER into
git, it'll use that.
As this is a do-once while in the incubator, it's not a burden.
>
>
> DEPENDENCIES is also auto-generated by apache-jar-resource-bundle.
Ditto - though I have not come across an autogenerator that did track
through the POM in any decent way.
>
> There is one per submodule.. the top level project does not have any
> directly <dependencies> and hence it is empty.
>
> See for instance
> taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating/taverna-robundle/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES
> after building.
>> Release candidates are signed with a GPG key available at:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/taverna/KEYS
I really wish I had time to make a technical contribution to Taverna but
that's unlikely. Please remove my key.
Andy
>
>
> On 12 June 2015 at 11:08, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Some first reactions to start discussions:
>>
>> How does this fit with the release email from Shoaib? I can guess, maybe
>> wrongly - I think others might find it hard to piece the picture together.
>>
>> The NOTICE for language seems very large yet the LICENSE is just the AL.
>> It would speed up reviewing by mentors (and IPMC later) if there were some
>> notes as to what each inclusion is and where it is included. Is it modified?
>> Are any from upstream NOTICE files (i.e. necessary by other products
>> usage?).
>>
>> Isn't the bulk of the code (C) University of Manchester? That should be at
>> the top.
>>
>> NOTICE and LICENCE should be ASCII (theer are UTF-8 copyright symbols).
>>
>> DEPENDENCIES is somewhat minimal. The <dependencies> not so.
>>
>> The disclaimer is wrong:
>> [[
>> Apache Taverna Language APIs (Scufl2, Databundle) is an effort undergoing
>> incubation at the Apache Software
>> Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Incubator PMC.
>> ]]
>>
>> Taverna is undergoing incubation, not the sofware item.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> On 11/06/15 15:48, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>>
>>> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>>>
>>> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
>>> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
>>>
>>> Apache Taverna Language is a set of APIs for workflow definitions (SCUFL2)
>>> and workflow inputs/outputs/run (DataBundle), as consumed and produced by
>>> the
>>> Apache Taverna workflow system. The API includes support for working with
>>> Research Object Bundles, and loading/saving Taverna workflows in different
>>> formats.
>>>
>>>
>>> The release candidates to be voted over are available at:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-parent-1-incubating-RC2/
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-RC2/
>>>
>>> SHA-1 checksums:
>>> 8199880048a59cde622e0caa24c3bc3d83bc5d5a
>>> taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
>>> 7032e9d2be834f7c029aae562b62613481bf6939
>>> taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>>>
>>> MD5 checksums:
>>> 7f9b107b9f1dc0407783ac0ad484d6ea
>>> taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
>>> 35d3085b596b2dd4b30a0234259efade
>>> taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>>>
>>>
>>> Build the release candidate in the above order, using:
>>>
>>> mvn clean install
>>>
>>> The release candidates correspond to the following git commits:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-maven-parent.git;a=commit;h=3ba669c78782d3fc3b548e2a512d201ee922b34a
>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-language.git;a=commit;h=3340e2090e604b40ac0b88675f57c1d12032d060
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Release candidates are signed with a GPG key available at:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/taverna/KEYS
>>>
>>> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetaverna-1003/
>>>
>>> The changelog for this release is available from JIRA:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332247
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332246
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please vote on releasing these packages as:
>>>
>>> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
>>> Apache Taverna Language 0.1.0-incubating
>>>
>>>
>>> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a
>>> majority of at least three +1 Apache Taverna PPMC votes are cast.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package
>>> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>
>>> Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just
>>> committers, please feel free to try out the release candidate
>>> and provide your votes.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> (Before anyone asks, RC1 was a release candidate tag I dropped as it
>>> used an older Apache super-pom)
>>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
Well, this is my take on "release early, release often" (although it
is not early. Taverna Language is ready to be released, as we have
already discussed several times on this list. It's a foundation for
the rest of Taverna 3. There would probably be more releases of
Taverna Language later in summer/autumn, particularly to include the
Command Line tool from GSOC.
Going through, and as far as I can tell, none of the notices listed
require their license text to be implicitly bundled or mentioned in
such LICENSE. The individual 'foreign' files have corresponding
copyright headers - see rat excludes in pom.xml
The W3C license have:
> The materials contained in the Site may be downloaded or copied provided that ALL copies retain the copyright and any other proprietary notices contained on the materials. No material may be modified, edited or taken out of context such that its use creates a false or misleading statement or impression as to the positions, statements or actions of W3C.
The only modifications to W3C files have been to *add* their copyright
headers where it was just implicit from their parent specification,
e.g. compare http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd (in the http tar-pit) and
https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/blob/master/taverna-scufl2-schemas/src/main/resources/org/apache/taverna/scufl2/rdfxml/xsd/xml.xsd
The CC licensed stuff basically says:
> Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
which an entry in NOTICE should suffice, but additionally here as well
I added copyright headers if it was missing.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode says:
> You must keep intact all notices that refer to this License and to the disclaimer of warranties with every copy of the Work You Distribute or Publicly Perform. When You Distribute or Publicly Perform the Work, You may not impose any effective technological measures on the Work that restrict the ability of a recipient of the Work from You to exercise the rights granted to that recipient under the terms of the License. This Section 4(a) applies to the Work as incorporated in a Collection, but this does not require the Collection apart from the Work itself to be made subject to the terms of this License.
Here the Collection is the taverna-language source zip.
The DISCLAIMER is auto-generated by
<resourceBundle>org.apache:apache-incubator-disclaimer-resource-bundle:1.1</resourceBundle>
the template picks up the <name> from pom.xml
https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-maven-parent/blob/master/pom.xml#L278
Presumably the problem here is that we have multiple top-level
projects. So should all the projects have the same DISCLAIMER with
just "Apache Taverna is an effort .." instead?
DEPENDENCIES is also auto-generated by apache-jar-resource-bundle.
There is one per submodule.. the top level project does not have any
directly <dependencies> and hence it is empty.
See for instance
taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating/taverna-robundle/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES
after building.
On 12 June 2015 at 11:08, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Some first reactions to start discussions:
>
> How does this fit with the release email from Shoaib? I can guess, maybe
> wrongly - I think others might find it hard to piece the picture together.
>
> The NOTICE for language seems very large yet the LICENSE is just the AL.
> It would speed up reviewing by mentors (and IPMC later) if there were some
> notes as to what each inclusion is and where it is included. Is it modified?
> Are any from upstream NOTICE files (i.e. necessary by other products
> usage?).
>
> Isn't the bulk of the code (C) University of Manchester? That should be at
> the top.
>
> NOTICE and LICENCE should be ASCII (theer are UTF-8 copyright symbols).
>
> DEPENDENCIES is somewhat minimal. The <dependencies> not so.
>
> The disclaimer is wrong:
> [[
> Apache Taverna Language APIs (Scufl2, Databundle) is an effort undergoing
> incubation at the Apache Software
> Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Incubator PMC.
> ]]
>
> Taverna is undergoing incubation, not the sofware item.
>
> Andy
>
>
> On 11/06/15 15:48, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>
>> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>>
>> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
>> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
>>
>> Apache Taverna Language is a set of APIs for workflow definitions (SCUFL2)
>> and workflow inputs/outputs/run (DataBundle), as consumed and produced by
>> the
>> Apache Taverna workflow system. The API includes support for working with
>> Research Object Bundles, and loading/saving Taverna workflows in different
>> formats.
>>
>>
>> The release candidates to be voted over are available at:
>>
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-parent-1-incubating-RC2/
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-RC2/
>>
>> SHA-1 checksums:
>> 8199880048a59cde622e0caa24c3bc3d83bc5d5a
>> taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
>> 7032e9d2be834f7c029aae562b62613481bf6939
>> taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>>
>> MD5 checksums:
>> 7f9b107b9f1dc0407783ac0ad484d6ea
>> taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
>> 35d3085b596b2dd4b30a0234259efade
>> taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>>
>>
>> Build the release candidate in the above order, using:
>>
>> mvn clean install
>>
>> The release candidates correspond to the following git commits:
>>
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-maven-parent.git;a=commit;h=3ba669c78782d3fc3b548e2a512d201ee922b34a
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-language.git;a=commit;h=3340e2090e604b40ac0b88675f57c1d12032d060
>>
>>
>>
>> Release candidates are signed with a GPG key available at:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/taverna/KEYS
>>
>> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>>
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetaverna-1003/
>>
>> The changelog for this release is available from JIRA:
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332247
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332246
>>
>>
>>
>> Please vote on releasing these packages as:
>>
>> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
>> Apache Taverna Language 0.1.0-incubating
>>
>>
>> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a
>> majority of at least three +1 Apache Taverna PPMC votes are cast.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package
>> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>
>> Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just
>> committers, please feel free to try out the release candidate
>> and provide your votes.
>>
>>
>>
>> (Before anyone asks, RC1 was a release candidate tag I dropped as it
>> used an older Apache super-pom)
>>
>
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Some first reactions to start discussions:
How does this fit with the release email from Shoaib? I can guess, maybe
wrongly - I think others might find it hard to piece the picture together.
The NOTICE for language seems very large yet the LICENSE is just the AL.
It would speed up reviewing by mentors (and IPMC later) if there were
some notes as to what each inclusion is and where it is included. Is it
modified? Are any from upstream NOTICE files (i.e. necessary by other
products usage?).
Isn't the bulk of the code (C) University of Manchester? That should be
at the top.
NOTICE and LICENCE should be ASCII (theer are UTF-8 copyright symbols).
DEPENDENCIES is somewhat minimal. The <dependencies> not so.
The disclaimer is wrong:
[[
Apache Taverna Language APIs (Scufl2, Databundle) is an effort
undergoing incubation at the Apache Software
Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Incubator PMC.
]]
Taverna is undergoing incubation, not the sofware item.
Andy
On 11/06/15 15:48, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>
> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
>
> Apache Taverna Language is a set of APIs for workflow definitions (SCUFL2)
> and workflow inputs/outputs/run (DataBundle), as consumed and produced by the
> Apache Taverna workflow system. The API includes support for working with
> Research Object Bundles, and loading/saving Taverna workflows in different
> formats.
>
>
> The release candidates to be voted over are available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-parent-1-incubating-RC2/
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-RC2/
>
> SHA-1 checksums:
> 8199880048a59cde622e0caa24c3bc3d83bc5d5a
> taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
> 7032e9d2be834f7c029aae562b62613481bf6939
> taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> MD5 checksums:
> 7f9b107b9f1dc0407783ac0ad484d6ea
> taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
> 35d3085b596b2dd4b30a0234259efade
> taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>
>
> Build the release candidate in the above order, using:
>
> mvn clean install
>
> The release candidates correspond to the following git commits:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-maven-parent.git;a=commit;h=3ba669c78782d3fc3b548e2a512d201ee922b34a
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-language.git;a=commit;h=3340e2090e604b40ac0b88675f57c1d12032d060
>
>
>
> Release candidates are signed with a GPG key available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/taverna/KEYS
>
> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetaverna-1003/
>
> The changelog for this release is available from JIRA:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332247
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332246
>
>
>
> Please vote on releasing these packages as:
>
> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
> Apache Taverna Language 0.1.0-incubating
>
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a
> majority of at least three +1 Apache Taverna PPMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just
> committers, please feel free to try out the release candidate
> and provide your votes.
>
>
>
> (Before anyone asks, RC1 was a release candidate tag I dropped as it
> used an older Apache super-pom)
>
Re: [] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 25/06/15 14:38, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> I'm sorry, I have not yet had time to do your suggested changes to
> NOTICE and LICENSE and the other comments. I agree that to reduce
> NOTICE and grow LICENSE is good.
Sympathies - finding time is hard! (especially when it's sunny which is
is here ATM). There is always the option of a quick message to say "ack
(PS I am time-poor at the moment)"
> Considering also the other comments from Alan and Christian, would it
> be best to pull this RC and try again?
It is a hard decision between early/often and not incurring more work
overall. It's always been a case-by-case decision for me.
There is a community decision as to quality/timeliness/work items done
vs postponed.
My personal advice (which you can ignore!) at this stage is do much of
it properly this first time - taking time now to get the release tidy
saves time overall. Maybe identify the next RM, document the process,
split the workload.
Andy
>
>
>
> On 22 June 2015 at 13:16, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 11/06/15 15:48, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>>
>>> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>>>
>>> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
>>> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
>>
>>
>> This seems to have stalled - I'm not sure as to why that is.
>>
>> What are people's (especially the PPMC) expectations of what happens when a
>> release is called?
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: [] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
I'm sorry, I have not yet had time to do your suggested changes to
NOTICE and LICENSE and the other comments. I agree that to reduce
NOTICE and grow LICENSE is good.
Considering also the other comments from Alan and Christian, would it
be best to pull this RC and try again?
On 22 June 2015 at 13:16, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 11/06/15 15:48, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>
>> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>>
>> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
>> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
>
>
> This seems to have stalled - I'm not sure as to why that is.
>
> What are people's (especially the PPMC) expectations of what happens when a
> release is called?
>
> Andy
>
>
>
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Re: [] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Some response on licensing but there were other points e.g. the
DISCLAIMER isn't right - relying on automatic determination isn't enough
- and NOTICE is required at the top of a git repo. DEPENDENCIES would be
nice as well.
More to the process point - there are now 2 +1 from the PPMC; that's not
very many out of 11.
PPMC - this is a step on the journey. I hope you can find the time to
look at the release and vote. This is not a step for the mentors to vet
one persons work.
(Mentors - what say you to my comments? Other comments?)
Andy
On 22/06/15 13:50, Pierce, Marlon wrote:
> Andy, were your comments addressed from your +0 vote.
>
> Typically also there should be a [DISCUSS] thread separately from the
> [VOTE] thread.
>
> Marlon
>
>
> On 6/22/15, 8:16 AM, "Andy Seaborne" <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 11/06/15 15:48, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>>>
>>> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
>>> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
>>
>> This seems to have stalled - I'm not sure as to why that is.
>>
>> What are people's (especially the PPMC) expectations of what happens
>> when a release is called?
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by "Pierce, Marlon" <ma...@iu.edu>.
Andy, were your comments addressed from your +0 vote.
Typically also there should be a [DISCUSS] thread separately from the
[VOTE] thread.
Marlon
On 6/22/15, 8:16 AM, "Andy Seaborne" <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>On 11/06/15 15:48, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>>
>> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
>> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
>
>This seems to have stalled - I'm not sure as to why that is.
>
>What are people's (especially the PPMC) expectations of what happens
>when a release is called?
>
> Andy
>
>
>
Re: [] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 11/06/15 15:48, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>
> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
This seems to have stalled - I'm not sure as to why that is.
What are people's (especially the PPMC) expectations of what happens
when a release is called?
Andy
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
I struggled to remove DEPENDENCIES as it is injected in by the Apache
Commons parent assembly that builds source-release.zip
There seems to be some Maven bug in that the DEPENDENCIES of the first
non-pom module (scufl2-api) is used in the root project - thus the
source-release gets a non-sensical DEPENDENCIES.
Trying to modify the assembly, e.g. to exclude taverna-wfdesc turned
tricky - basically reconstructing the whole assembly from scratch. I
don't think we want to be maintaining that in our builds across all
our projects, so I have rather added a generic DEPENDENCIES to
override it:
stain@biggie-utopic:~/src/taverna/incubator-taverna-language$ cat DEPENDENCIES
Dependencies are declared within each Maven submodule.
See */target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES
after running: mvn process-resources
On 13 June 2015 at 18:03, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Please vote on releasing these packages as:
>>
>> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
>
>
> +0 with comments.
> I'd like to see (1) fixed.
>
> Checks done:
> .asc : good
> .md5 : good
> .sha1 : good
> maven build and verify ; good.
>
> Needs correcting:
>
> 1/ The text in DISCLAIMER and NOTICE says:
> "Apache Taverna (incubating) Maven parent"
>
> Other points: (should be noted and fixed sometime):
>
> 2/ There should be a NOTICE file in git.
> LICENSE and NOTICE go around in pairs.
>
> 3/ LICENSE removed the text "END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS"
> That is part of the license, to match text at the start so should be
> included IMO.
>
> 4/ DEPENDENCES
> If there is going to be a DEPENDENCES, it would be good to include junit
> which is EPL.
>
> Noted in passing:
>
> 5/ Can't checkout from URL in the email:
> Better to use
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-taverna-maven-parent
>
> 6/ README.md is a github README.
> e.g.Build status
> so not focused on source-release. Slightly confusing.
>
> 7/ pom.xml seems to have suffered reformatting.
>
> 8/ It build java tests!
>
> Possibly because there is a maven-compiler-plugin etc in the build, not just
> in the <pluginManagement> section, I get:
>
> """
> [WARNING] JAR will be empty - no content was marked for inclusion!
> """
> and there is a -tests jar even thouhg it's packaged as pom.
>
> Andy
>
>
>> Apache Taverna Language 0.1.0-incubating
>>
>>
>> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a
>> majority of at least three +1 Apache Taverna PPMC votes are cast.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package
>> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
>
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
Hello,
+1
Release candidates downloaded from the supplied zip url and built using -
windows 7 x64
oracle jdk 1.8.0_45
apache maven 3.3.3
checks done -
sha1: good
md5: good
maven clean install: good
Cheers,
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:andy@apache.org]
Sent: 13 June 2015 18:04
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
> Please vote on releasing these packages as:
>
> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
+0 with comments.
I'd like to see (1) fixed.
Checks done:
.asc : good
.md5 : good
.sha1 : good
maven build and verify ; good.
Needs correcting:
1/ The text in DISCLAIMER and NOTICE says:
"Apache Taverna (incubating) Maven parent"
Other points: (should be noted and fixed sometime):
2/ There should be a NOTICE file in git.
LICENSE and NOTICE go around in pairs.
3/ LICENSE removed the text "END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS"
That is part of the license, to match text at the start so should be included IMO.
4/ DEPENDENCES
If there is going to be a DEPENDENCES, it would be good to include junit which is EPL.
Noted in passing:
5/ Can't checkout from URL in the email:
Better to use
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-taverna-maven-parent
6/ README.md is a github README.
e.g.Build status
so not focused on source-release. Slightly confusing.
7/ pom.xml seems to have suffered reformatting.
8/ It build java tests!
Possibly because there is a maven-compiler-plugin etc in the build, not just in the <pluginManagement> section, I get:
"""
[WARNING] JAR will be empty - no content was marked for inclusion!
"""
and there is a -tests jar even thouhg it's packaged as pom.
Andy
> Apache Taverna Language 0.1.0-incubating
>
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 Apache Taverna PPMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object [ ] -1 Do not
> release this package because...
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
> Please vote on releasing these packages as:
>
> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
+0 with comments.
I'd like to see (1) fixed.
Checks done:
.asc : good
.md5 : good
.sha1 : good
maven build and verify ; good.
Needs correcting:
1/ The text in DISCLAIMER and NOTICE says:
"Apache Taverna (incubating) Maven parent"
Other points: (should be noted and fixed sometime):
2/ There should be a NOTICE file in git.
LICENSE and NOTICE go around in pairs.
3/ LICENSE removed the text "END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS"
That is part of the license, to match text at the start so should be
included IMO.
4/ DEPENDENCES
If there is going to be a DEPENDENCES, it would be good to include junit
which is EPL.
Noted in passing:
5/ Can't checkout from URL in the email:
Better to use
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-taverna-maven-parent
6/ README.md is a github README.
e.g.Build status
so not focused on source-release. Slightly confusing.
7/ pom.xml seems to have suffered reformatting.
8/ It build java tests!
Possibly because there is a maven-compiler-plugin etc in the build, not
just in the <pluginManagement> section, I get:
"""
[WARNING] JAR will be empty - no content was marked for inclusion!
"""
and there is a -tests jar even thouhg it's packaged as pom.
Andy
> Apache Taverna Language 0.1.0-incubating
>
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a
> majority of at least three +1 Apache Taverna PPMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
Hello,
Re (2). There is probably too much low level information about maven in it. The first line pretty much covers it "Common Maven Parent for all the other Apache Taverna repositories.". Then it should say why you need to build this. Do I need to build this before other taverna things? Can I build the 'language' before this (answer: probably not but it's not obvious from the README)?
Cheers,
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: alaninmcr [mailto:alaninmcr@googlemail.com]
Sent: 22 June 2015 13:51
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
On 11/06/2015 15:48, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>
> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
>
> Apache Taverna Language is a set of APIs for workflow definitions
> (SCUFL2) and workflow inputs/outputs/run (DataBundle), as consumed and
> produced by the Apache Taverna workflow system. The API includes
> support for working with Research Object Bundles, and loading/saving
> Taverna workflows in different formats.
I checked the check sums and also compiled and installed both without problems. I have some minor issues:
(1) Is it normal that the NOTICE file should just be a listing? I'd have expected some context.
(2) I found the README.md of parent to be unhelpful.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object [ ] -1 Do not
> release this package because...
>
> Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers,
> please feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your
> votes.
+1 Non binding
> (Before anyone asks, RC1 was a release candidate tag I dropped as it
> used an older Apache super-pom)
Alan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by alaninmcr <al...@googlemail.com>.
On 11/06/2015 15:48, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>
> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
>
> Apache Taverna Language is a set of APIs for workflow definitions (SCUFL2)
> and workflow inputs/outputs/run (DataBundle), as consumed and produced by the
> Apache Taverna workflow system. The API includes support for working with
> Research Object Bundles, and loading/saving Taverna workflows in different
> formats.
I checked the check sums and also compiled and installed both without
problems. I have some minor issues:
(1) Is it normal that the NOTICE file should just be a listing? I'd have
expected some context.
(2) I found the README.md of parent to be unhelpful.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just
> committers, please feel free to try out the release candidate
> and provide your votes.
+1 Non binding
> (Before anyone asks, RC1 was a release candidate tag I dropped as it
> used an older Apache super-pom)
Alan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
Christian,
Thanks for the review. Which hard-coded dependency numbers did you
find? Are the below all?
I think it is good (even recommended) to hard-code versions of plugins
in <build> - otherwise you might find that a future build will use a
later plugin that breaks something. I have added the plugin versions
to <pluginManagement> of taverna-maven-parent.
I fixed the jaxb inconsitency in taverna-scufl2-examples, and used
jena-arq instead of jena-osgi.jar (the OSGi bundle is not needed for
this command line tool). Menaka might want to check this as well.
The taverna-baclava-language is a new module Alan made for parsing
them (but not yet convert to RO Bundle).
On 23 June 2015 at 14:25, Christian Brenninkmeijer
<ch...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> I regret but I have to vote:
> -1 non binding
>
> My main reason for this is the existence of hard code depency numbers.
> As we are using taverna parent to provided version numbers this should be done completely consistant.
> Some place hard coded numbers where found are
> taverna-scufl2-examples
>
> Also several poms have hard coded number in the <build> section.
> This is less critical but why not be consistant.
>
> I also read comments regarding Licence, notice disclaimer ect which should be address in this the first release.
>
> On the plus side the code did build and test.
>
> I noticed that Baclava support was still included and wondered why?
> Should this package and the classes at the very least not be marked Depricated?
>
> Christian
> ________________________________________
> From: Stian Soiland-Reyes [stain@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 3:48 PM
> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>
> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
>
> Apache Taverna Language is a set of APIs for workflow definitions (SCUFL2)
> and workflow inputs/outputs/run (DataBundle), as consumed and produced by the
> Apache Taverna workflow system. The API includes support for working with
> Research Object Bundles, and loading/saving Taverna workflows in different
> formats.
>
>
> The release candidates to be voted over are available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-parent-1-incubating-RC2/
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-RC2/
>
> SHA-1 checksums:
> 8199880048a59cde622e0caa24c3bc3d83bc5d5a
> taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
> 7032e9d2be834f7c029aae562b62613481bf6939
> taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> MD5 checksums:
> 7f9b107b9f1dc0407783ac0ad484d6ea
> taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
> 35d3085b596b2dd4b30a0234259efade
> taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>
>
> Build the release candidate in the above order, using:
>
> mvn clean install
>
> The release candidates correspond to the following git commits:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-maven-parent.git;a=commit;h=3ba669c78782d3fc3b548e2a512d201ee922b34a
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-language.git;a=commit;h=3340e2090e604b40ac0b88675f57c1d12032d060
>
>
>
> Release candidates are signed with a GPG key available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/taverna/KEYS
>
> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetaverna-1003/
>
> The changelog for this release is available from JIRA:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332247
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332246
>
>
>
> Please vote on releasing these packages as:
>
> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
> Apache Taverna Language 0.1.0-incubating
>
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a
> majority of at least three +1 Apache Taverna PPMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just
> committers, please feel free to try out the release candidate
> and provide your votes.
>
>
>
> (Before anyone asks, RC1 was a release candidate tag I dropped as it
> used an older Apache super-pom)
>
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes
> Apache Taverna (incubating)
> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
Hello,
I'll probably use VIM :)
Cheers,
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: alaninmcr [mailto:alaninmcr@googlemail.com]
Sent: 23 June 2015 16:05
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
If you are fixing the version numbers, it is worth checking that they are the only strange ones. Last time I messed in this area, I had to use Perl :(
Alan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by alaninmcr <al...@googlemail.com>.
If you are fixing the version numbers, it is worth checking that they
are the only strange ones. Last time I messed in this area, I had to use
Perl :(
Alan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
I don't see why Ian as a committer would need to do a pull request,
unless he is proposing a large change.
On 23 June 2015 at 16:17, alaninmcr <al...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 23/06/2015 15:57, Ian Dunlop wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Should I push any changes straight into master on the apache repos,
>> go via github or some other mechanism? What is the Apache way?
>
>
> You could commit to github and generate a pull request to the Apache repo.
>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Ian
>
>
> Alan
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by alaninmcr <al...@googlemail.com>.
On 23/06/2015 15:57, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Should I push any changes straight into master on the apache repos,
> go via github or some other mechanism? What is the Apache way?
You could commit to github and generate a pull request to the Apache repo.
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
Alan
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
Hello,
Should I push any changes straight into master on the apache repos, go via github or some other mechanism? What is the Apache way?
Cheers,
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: alaninmcr [mailto:alaninmcr@googlemail.com]
Sent: 23 June 2015 15:55
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
On 23/06/2015 15:33, alaninmcr wrote:
> On 23/06/2015 15:24, Ian Dunlop wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> So based on Christians comment I had a quick look. In
>> taverna-scufl2-examples junit is 4.4, commons-io is 2.1 and jaxm-imp
>> is 2.2.4-1. In taverna parent they are 4.11 and 2.4 and 2.2.11. There
>> is also io.airlift 0.7 in taverna-language-commandline with no
>> mention in the parent. Taverna-scufl2-wfdesc has a few dependencies
>> with version numbers. Is there a reason for all this or just an
>> oversight. I'm actually impressed that there are not more.
>
> It should just be an oversight. If they do not run with the more
> recent values then we may be in trouble. It should certainly be
> explicit that they are not using the later versions.
Using jaxb 2.2.11 instead of 2.2.4-1 causes problems.
2.2.6 is fine but 2.2.7 generates warnings about conflicts with Jena.
2.2.10 and 2.2.11 fail with errors for missing com.sun.xml.bind classes.
So I'd suggest fixing junit and commons-io versions, but leave jaxb impl as it needs more debugging.
Alan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by alaninmcr <al...@googlemail.com>.
On 23/06/2015 15:33, alaninmcr wrote:
> On 23/06/2015 15:24, Ian Dunlop wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> So based on Christians comment I had a quick look. In
>> taverna-scufl2-examples junit is 4.4, commons-io is 2.1 and jaxm-imp
>> is 2.2.4-1. In taverna parent they are 4.11 and 2.4 and 2.2.11. There
>> is also io.airlift 0.7 in taverna-language-commandline with no
>> mention in the parent. Taverna-scufl2-wfdesc has a few dependencies
>> with version numbers. Is there a reason for all this or just an
>> oversight. I'm actually impressed that there are not more.
>
> It should just be an oversight. If they do not run with the more recent
> values then we may be in trouble. It should certainly be explicit that
> they are not using the later versions.
Using jaxb 2.2.11 instead of 2.2.4-1 causes problems.
2.2.6 is fine but 2.2.7 generates warnings about conflicts with Jena.
2.2.10 and 2.2.11 fail with errors for missing com.sun.xml.bind classes.
So I'd suggest fixing junit and commons-io versions, but leave jaxb impl
as it needs more debugging.
Alan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by alaninmcr <al...@googlemail.com>.
On 23/06/2015 15:24, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So based on Christians comment I had a quick look. In
> taverna-scufl2-examples junit is 4.4, commons-io is 2.1 and jaxm-imp
> is 2.2.4-1. In taverna parent they are 4.11 and 2.4 and 2.2.11. There
> is also io.airlift 0.7 in taverna-language-commandline with no
> mention in the parent. Taverna-scufl2-wfdesc has a few dependencies
> with version numbers. Is there a reason for all this or just an
> oversight. I'm actually impressed that there are not more.
It should just be an oversight. If they do not run with the more recent
values then we may be in trouble. It should certainly be explicit that
they are not using the later versions.
For airlift, it looks like there is a 0.110 which is part of airbase 38
-see https://github.com/airlift/airlift/blob/0.110/pom.xml
> Is this a good enough reason to delay an incubator release?
I think they should be fixed.
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
Alan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
the hard-coded versions in wfdesc are for sesame, right? They need to
be that particular version for Elmo compatibility - but sadly this
ancient Sesame is no longer officially available and needs to come
from the mirror in the myGrid Maven repository. This is one reason
why I left wfdesc out of the normal build - so I would propose to not
review wfdesc.
Is there an easy way to exclude taverna-scufl2-wfdesc from this
release build at all? The release zip is build by the assembly plugin.
On 23 June 2015 at 15:24, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So based on Christians comment I had a quick look. In taverna-scufl2-examples junit is 4.4, commons-io is 2.1 and jaxm-imp is 2.2.4-1. In taverna parent they are 4.11 and 2.4 and 2.2.11.
> There is also io.airlift 0.7 in taverna-language-commandline with no mention in the parent.
> Taverna-scufl2-wfdesc has a few dependencies with version numbers.
> Is there a reason for all this or just an oversight. I'm actually impressed that there are not more.
>
> Is this a good enough reason to delay an incubator release?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Brenninkmeijer [mailto:christian.brenninkmeijer@manchester.ac.uk]
> Sent: 23 June 2015 14:26
> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>
> I regret but I have to vote:
> -1 non binding
>
> My main reason for this is the existence of hard code depency numbers.
> As we are using taverna parent to provided version numbers this should be done completely consistant.
> Some place hard coded numbers where found are taverna-scufl2-examples
>
> Also several poms have hard coded number in the <build> section.
> This is less critical but why not be consistant.
>
> I also read comments regarding Licence, notice disclaimer ect which should be address in this the first release.
>
> On the plus side the code did build and test.
>
> I noticed that Baclava support was still included and wondered why?
> Should this package and the classes at the very least not be marked Depricated?
>
> Christian
> ________________________________________
> From: Stian Soiland-Reyes [stain@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 3:48 PM
> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
>
> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
>
> Apache Taverna Language is a set of APIs for workflow definitions (SCUFL2) and workflow inputs/outputs/run (DataBundle), as consumed and produced by the Apache Taverna workflow system. The API includes support for working with Research Object Bundles, and loading/saving Taverna workflows in different formats.
>
>
> The release candidates to be voted over are available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-parent-1-incubating-RC2/
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-RC2/
>
> SHA-1 checksums:
> 8199880048a59cde622e0caa24c3bc3d83bc5d5a
> taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
> 7032e9d2be834f7c029aae562b62613481bf6939
> taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> MD5 checksums:
> 7f9b107b9f1dc0407783ac0ad484d6ea
> taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
> 35d3085b596b2dd4b30a0234259efade
> taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>
>
> Build the release candidate in the above order, using:
>
> mvn clean install
>
> The release candidates correspond to the following git commits:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-maven-parent.git;a=commit;h=3ba669c78782d3fc3b548e2a512d201ee922b34a
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-language.git;a=commit;h=3340e2090e604b40ac0b88675f57c1d12032d060
>
>
>
> Release candidates are signed with a GPG key available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/taverna/KEYS
>
> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetaverna-1003/
>
> The changelog for this release is available from JIRA:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332247
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332246
>
>
>
> Please vote on releasing these packages as:
>
> Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
> Apache Taverna Language 0.1.0-incubating
>
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three +1 Apache Taverna PPMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers, please feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your votes.
>
>
>
> (Before anyone asks, RC1 was a release candidate tag I dropped as it used an older Apache super-pom)
>
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes
> Apache Taverna (incubating)
> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
Hello,
We cancelled the vote due to some build and documentation issues. They have been fixed and we will try a new deploy and vote soon.
Cheers,
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: Pierce, Marlon [mailto:marpierc@iu.edu]
Sent: 13 July 2015 18:29
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Was the vote canceled? Are you getting ready to try again? I’m catching up after extended time away. When you do hold the vote, it useful to have separate [VOTE] and [DISCUSS] threads, with [VOTE] responses just +/-1 or +/- 0 and discussion in the [DISCUSS] thread.
Marlon
From: Menaka Madushanka <me...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org<ma...@taverna.incubator.apache.org>" <de...@taverna.incubator.apache.org>>
Date: Friday, July 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM
To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>>, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>>, "dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org<ma...@taverna.incubator.apache.org>" <de...@taverna.incubator.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Hello,
It is building fine....
No problem.
All the functions are working fine. :-)
Cheers
Menaka
On 10 July 2015 at 22:26, Menaka Madushanka <me...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Stian,
Thank you very much for the greetings. Hope you are spending happy time in the conference....!!! :-) Before the version change it worked perfectly.
After changing the version back to 0.15.0, the project was just like as in the screenshot.[cid:ii_ibxv79pg0_14e78e48d8ba6833]
But doesn't show where the problem is.
I'm trying to build it again and continue working.
Cheers
Menaka
On 10 July 2015 at 20:38, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>> wrote:
Menaka, did you get it building..?
Greetings from Dublin. :)
On 10 July 2015 at 12:05, Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk>> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> I've just tried with a fresh git clone of
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language.git
> Then I deleted the maven repository and mvn clean install the
> taverna-language-commandline only.
> It all worked OK with a build success.
> What is the maven error when you try mvn clean install?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> On 10/07/15 07:28, Menaka Madushanka wrote:
>> Hello, I deleted my local maven repository and updated the project.
>> But it still downloads the 0.15.1 snapshot version. In my pom files
>> its 0.15.0 version.
>>
>> Cheers. Menaka.
>>
>> On 8 July 2015 at 16:21, Ian Dunlop
>> <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have changed the comandline pom back to 0.15.0 and the
>>> taverna-language back to depending on 1-incubating-SNAPSHOT. I have
>>> no idea what happened to the version numbers, I think it was due to
>>> the failed release attempt. Hopefully the tavern-language and
>>> commandline should build ok now.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Menaka Madushanka
>>> [mailto:menaka12350@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>] Sent: 03 July 2015 17:11 To:
>>> dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org<mailto:dev@taverna.incubator.apache
>>> .org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language
>>> 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>>>
>>> Hello Ian,
>>>
>>> why does it depend on taverna-language-0.15.1
>>>
>>>
>>> I will change it and send a pull request.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Taverna-language-commandline still seems to have build issues on
>>>> its own, this time with scufl2-iwir.
>>>
>>>
>>> Are there build errors with this module?
>>>
>>> Cheers Menaka
>>>
>>> On 3 July 2015 at 20:15, Ian Dunlop
>>> <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Taverna-language-commandline still seems to have build issues on
>>>> its own, this time with scufl2-iwir. Builds fine from parent. I
>>>> thought the build issues had been fixed. I'm not going to continue
>>>> the taverna-language deploy until someone can convince me that the
>>>> dependencies are sorted.....why does it depend on
>>>> taverna-language-0.15.1, is this something to with the failed mvn
>>> release:deploy that I mentioned earlier?
>>>>
>>>> Java 8 is also a lot stricter with Javadoc tags which means you
>>>> need to tell the maven Javadoc-plugin not to be so strict, see
>>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15886209/maven-is-not-working-in
>>>> -
> ja
>>>>
>>>>
> va-8-when-javadoc-tags-are-incomplete
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Ian Dunlop
>>>> [mailto:Ian.Dunlop@manchester.ac.uk<mailto:Ian.Dunlop@manchester.ac
>>>> .uk>] Sent: 03 July 2015 15:15
>>>> To:
>>>> dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org<mailto:dev@taverna.incubator.apach
>>>> e.org> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language
>>>> 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Can't say I'm having a wonderfully fun time. The taverna-language
>>>> deploy failed at the last second due to an upstream conflict and
>>>> rolling that back is just plain complex.
>>>> Now I find that the taverna-language-commandline is still depending
>>>> on taverna-language 0.15.1 ?? I'm going to stick at it and attempt
>>>> to deploy but someone will need to check if it makes sense and
>>>> possible pick up the pieces
>>> afterwards. Thank goodness for git revert.....
>>>> I'm tempted to slink back into the happy free for all of javascript
>>>> and remember all this as a bad dream.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Christian Brenninkmeijer
>>>> [mailto:
>>>> christian.brenninkmeijer@manchester.ac.uk<ma...@manchester.ac.uk>] Sent: 03 July 2015 11:21 To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org<ma...@taverna.incubator.apache.org> Subject:
>>>> RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
>>>> RC2
>>>>
>>>> I fully agree with Stian.
>>>>
>>>> Go for RC3 and critical to see someone else able to do the release
>>>> manager role
>>>>
>>>> Christian ________________________________________ From: Stian
>>>> Soiland-Reyes [stain@apache.org<ma...@apache.org>] Sent:
>>>> Thursday, July 02, 2015
>>>> 4:20 PM To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org<ma...@taverna.incubator.apache.org> Subject: Re:
>>>> [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>>>>
>>>> +1 to try an RC3 - the NOTICE and LICENSE should be in a better
>>>> shape
>>> now.
>>>>
>>>> Great that you'll have a go as release manager so we spread the
>>>> skills.. and improve the docs hopefully as I think I assumed many
>>>> things known about the Maven release plugin. :))
>>>>
>>>> On 1 July 2015 at 15:18, Ian Dunlop
>>>> <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm going to attempt to make a release based on the info at
>>>> http://taverna.staging.apache.org/community/releasing.
>>>>> I'm waiting for/figuring out how to get
>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/taverna.asc to update itself
>>>> with my OpenPGP key fingerprint.
>>>>> Wish me luck......
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Ian
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: alaninmcr
>>>>> [mailto:alaninmcr@googlemail.com<ma...@googlemail.com>]
>>>>> Sent: 01 July 2015 14:17
>>>>> To:
>>>>> dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org<mailto:dev@taverna.incubator.apac
>>>>> he.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language
>>>>> 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/07/2015 14:13, Ian Dunlop wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A release with the build issues fixed but with the documentation
>>>>>> issues
>>>> added to JIRA.
>>>>>
>>>>> So a RC3. Sounds OK to me.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ian
>>>>>
>>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- Stian Soiland-Reyes Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons
>>>> RDF (incubating) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena Faculty of Engineering,
>>> <http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng> University of Peradeniyaya. LinkedIn
>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVn6brAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5gOwIALHwWREYgWeyoi2apf32jzua
> bs0yNMSmwosxSIP43qb/67Y/jq0FXz1gSbEVwrJ+dO+h+B6ZnxGFaEiWWiIZTNu3
> QhH++ycACGeG7UyVrCtCWFsLH4fco/YxWOdj6ADwhdCl8y41bKQkmUvdldhK87+q
> qQLBxX6YiIs2j0qnqmOlxVxsSnXUfSd2uUaL44+egwnB1hWTKxxnOGnKSbos7lkj
> 0KDoV+etIuTlgego2KqoVP2zisCcxlaVdxO9BSF09IpraJ3Z187k0PMo3zqAAio7
> oswClwjV7k0H99IBNw4WEDs3uY3dn1woPVHUIOY59+q4EjiXWGvGdAAoaVgnIn4=
> =0LZ4
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
--
Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena
Faculty of Engineering,<http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng>
University of Peradeniyaya.
LinkedIn<http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
--
Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena
Faculty of Engineering,<http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng>
University of Peradeniyaya.
LinkedIn<http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by "Pierce, Marlon" <ma...@iu.edu>.
Was the vote canceled? Are you getting ready to try again? I’m catching up after extended time away. When you do hold the vote, it useful to have separate [VOTE] and [DISCUSS] threads, with [VOTE] responses just +/-1 or +/- 0 and discussion in the [DISCUSS] thread.
Marlon
From: Menaka Madushanka <me...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org<ma...@taverna.incubator.apache.org>" <de...@taverna.incubator.apache.org>>
Date: Friday, July 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM
To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>>, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>>, "dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org<ma...@taverna.incubator.apache.org>" <de...@taverna.incubator.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Hello,
It is building fine....
No problem.
All the functions are working fine. :-)
Cheers
Menaka
On 10 July 2015 at 22:26, Menaka Madushanka <me...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello Stian,
Thank you very much for the greetings. Hope you are spending happy time in the conference....!!! :-)
Before the version change it worked perfectly.
After changing the version back to 0.15.0, the project was just like as in the screenshot.[cid:ii_ibxv79pg0_14e78e48d8ba6833]
But doesn't show where the problem is.
I'm trying to build it again and continue working.
Cheers
Menaka
On 10 July 2015 at 20:38, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>> wrote:
Menaka, did you get it building..?
Greetings from Dublin. :)
On 10 July 2015 at 12:05, Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk>> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> I've just tried with a fresh git clone of
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language.git
> Then I deleted the maven repository and mvn clean install the
> taverna-language-commandline only.
> It all worked OK with a build success.
> What is the maven error when you try mvn clean install?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> On 10/07/15 07:28, Menaka Madushanka wrote:
>> Hello, I deleted my local maven repository and updated the project.
>> But it still downloads the 0.15.1 snapshot version. In my pom files
>> its 0.15.0 version.
>>
>> Cheers. Menaka.
>>
>> On 8 July 2015 at 16:21, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have changed the comandline pom back to 0.15.0 and the
>>> taverna-language back to depending on 1-incubating-SNAPSHOT. I
>>> have no idea what happened to the version numbers, I think it was
>>> due to the failed release attempt. Hopefully the tavern-language
>>> and commandline should build ok now.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Menaka Madushanka
>>> [mailto:menaka12350@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>] Sent: 03 July 2015 17:11 To:
>>> dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org<ma...@taverna.incubator.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release
>>> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>>>
>>> Hello Ian,
>>>
>>> why does it depend on taverna-language-0.15.1
>>>
>>>
>>> I will change it and send a pull request.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Taverna-language-commandline still seems to have build issues
>>>> on its own, this time with scufl2-iwir.
>>>
>>>
>>> Are there build errors with this module?
>>>
>>> Cheers Menaka
>>>
>>> On 3 July 2015 at 20:15, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Taverna-language-commandline still seems to have build issues
>>>> on its own, this time with scufl2-iwir. Builds fine from
>>>> parent. I thought the build issues had been fixed. I'm not
>>>> going to continue the taverna-language deploy until someone can
>>>> convince me that the dependencies are sorted.....why does it
>>>> depend on taverna-language-0.15.1, is this something to with
>>>> the failed mvn
>>> release:deploy that I mentioned earlier?
>>>>
>>>> Java 8 is also a lot stricter with Javadoc tags which means you
>>>> need to tell the maven Javadoc-plugin not to be so strict, see
>>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15886209/maven-is-not-working-in-
> ja
>>>>
>>>>
> va-8-when-javadoc-tags-are-incomplete
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Ian Dunlop
>>>> [mailto:Ian.Dunlop@manchester.ac.uk<ma...@manchester.ac.uk>] Sent: 03 July 2015 15:15
>>>> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org<ma...@taverna.incubator.apache.org> Subject: RE: [VOTE]
>>>> Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Can't say I'm having a wonderfully fun time. The
>>>> taverna-language deploy failed at the last second due to an
>>>> upstream conflict and rolling that back is just plain complex.
>>>> Now I find that the taverna-language-commandline is still
>>>> depending on taverna-language 0.15.1 ?? I'm going to stick at
>>>> it and attempt to deploy but someone will need to check if it
>>>> makes sense and possible pick up the pieces
>>> afterwards. Thank goodness for git revert.....
>>>> I'm tempted to slink back into the happy free for all of
>>>> javascript and remember all this as a bad dream.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Christian Brenninkmeijer
>>>> [mailto: christian.brenninkmeijer@manchester.ac.uk<ma...@manchester.ac.uk>] Sent: 03
>>>> July 2015 11:21 To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org<ma...@taverna.incubator.apache.org> Subject:
>>>> RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
>>>> RC2
>>>>
>>>> I fully agree with Stian.
>>>>
>>>> Go for RC3 and critical to see someone else able to do the
>>>> release manager role
>>>>
>>>> Christian ________________________________________ From: Stian
>>>> Soiland-Reyes [stain@apache.org<ma...@apache.org>] Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015
>>>> 4:20 PM To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org<ma...@taverna.incubator.apache.org> Subject: Re:
>>>> [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>>>>
>>>> +1 to try an RC3 - the NOTICE and LICENSE should be in a better
>>>> shape
>>> now.
>>>>
>>>> Great that you'll have a go as release manager so we spread the
>>>> skills.. and improve the docs hopefully as I think I assumed
>>>> many things known about the Maven release plugin. :))
>>>>
>>>> On 1 July 2015 at 15:18, Ian Dunlop
>>>> <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm going to attempt to make a release based on the info at
>>>> http://taverna.staging.apache.org/community/releasing.
>>>>> I'm waiting for/figuring out how to get
>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/taverna.asc to update
>>>> itself with my OpenPGP key fingerprint.
>>>>> Wish me luck......
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Ian
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: alaninmcr
>>>>> [mailto:alaninmcr@googlemail.com<ma...@googlemail.com>] Sent: 01 July 2015 14:17
>>>>> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org<ma...@taverna.incubator.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE]
>>>>> Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/07/2015 14:13, Ian Dunlop wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A release with the build issues fixed but with the
>>>>>> documentation issues
>>>> added to JIRA.
>>>>>
>>>>> So a RC3. Sounds OK to me.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ian
>>>>>
>>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- Stian Soiland-Reyes Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache
>>>> Commons RDF (incubating) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena Faculty of Engineering,
>>> <http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng> University of Peradeniyaya. LinkedIn
>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVn6brAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5gOwIALHwWREYgWeyoi2apf32jzua
> bs0yNMSmwosxSIP43qb/67Y/jq0FXz1gSbEVwrJ+dO+h+B6ZnxGFaEiWWiIZTNu3
> QhH++ycACGeG7UyVrCtCWFsLH4fco/YxWOdj6ADwhdCl8y41bKQkmUvdldhK87+q
> qQLBxX6YiIs2j0qnqmOlxVxsSnXUfSd2uUaL44+egwnB1hWTKxxnOGnKSbos7lkj
> 0KDoV+etIuTlgego2KqoVP2zisCcxlaVdxO9BSF09IpraJ3Z187k0PMo3zqAAio7
> oswClwjV7k0H99IBNw4WEDs3uY3dn1woPVHUIOY59+q4EjiXWGvGdAAoaVgnIn4=
> =0LZ4
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
--
Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena
Faculty of Engineering,<http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng>
University of Peradeniyaya.
LinkedIn<http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
--
Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena
Faculty of Engineering,<http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng>
University of Peradeniyaya.
LinkedIn<http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Menaka Madushanka <me...@gmail.com>.
[INFO] Replacing original artifact with shaded artifact.
[INFO] Replacing
/home/menaka/git/incubator-taverna-language/taverna-language-commandline/target/taverna-language-commandline-0.15.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
with
/home/menaka/git/incubator-taverna-language/taverna-language-commandline/target/taverna-language-commandline-0.15.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT-shaded.jar
[INFO] Dependency-reduced POM written at:
/home/menaka/git/incubator-taverna-language/taverna-language-commandline/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
[INFO] Dependency-reduced POM written at:
/home/menaka/git/incubator-taverna-language/taverna-language-commandline/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
[INFO]
[INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.5.1:install (default-install) @
taverna-language-commandline ---
[INFO] Downloading:
http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/shared/maven-shared-utils/0.4/maven-shared-utils-0.4.pom
[INFO] Downloaded:
http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/shared/maven-shared-utils/0.4/maven-shared-utils-0.4.pom
(4 KB at 1.3 KB/sec)
[INFO] Downloading:
http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/shared/maven-shared-utils/0.4/maven-shared-utils-0.4.jar
[INFO] Downloaded:
http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/shared/maven-shared-utils/0.4/maven-shared-utils-0.4.jar
(152 KB at 37.3 KB/sec)
[INFO] Installing
/home/menaka/git/incubator-taverna-language/taverna-language-commandline/target/taverna-language-commandline-0.15.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
to
/home/menaka/.m2/repository/org/apache/taverna/language/taverna-language-commandline/0.15.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/taverna-language-commandline-0.15.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] Installing
/home/menaka/git/incubator-taverna-language/taverna-language-commandline/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
to
/home/menaka/.m2/repository/org/apache/taverna/language/taverna-language-commandline/0.15.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/taverna-language-commandline-0.15.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.pom
[INFO] Installing
/home/menaka/git/incubator-taverna-language/taverna-language-commandline/target/taverna-language-commandline-0.15.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar
to
/home/menaka/.m2/repository/org/apache/taverna/language/taverna-language-commandline/0.15.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/taverna-language-commandline-0.15.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar
[INFO] Installing
/home/menaka/git/incubator-taverna-language/taverna-language-commandline/target/taverna-language-commandline-0.15.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT-test-sources.jar
to
/home/menaka/.m2/repository/org/apache/taverna/language/taverna-language-commandline/0.15.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/taverna-language-commandline-0.15.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT-test-sources.jar
[INFO] Installing
/home/menaka/git/incubator-taverna-language/taverna-language-commandline/target/taverna-language-commandline-0.15.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar
to
/home/menaka/.m2/repository/org/apache/taverna/language/taverna-language-commandline/0.15.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/taverna-language-commandline-0.15.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT-tests.jar
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 11:39 min
[INFO] Finished at: 2015-07-10T22:30:50+05:30
[INFO] Final Memory: 89M/290M
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 10 July 2015 at 22:37, Menaka Madushanka <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It is building fine....
> No problem.
> All the functions are working fine. :-)
>
> Cheers
> Menaka
>
> On 10 July 2015 at 22:26, Menaka Madushanka <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Stian,
>> Thank you very much for the greetings. Hope you are spending happy time
>> in the conference....!!! :-)
>> Before the version change it worked perfectly.
>> After changing the version back to 0.15.0, the project was just like as
>> in the screenshot.
>>
>> But doesn't show where the problem is.
>>
>> I'm trying to build it again and continue working.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Menaka
>>
>>
>> On 10 July 2015 at 20:38, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Menaka, did you get it building..?
>>>
>>> Greetings from Dublin. :)
>>>
>>> On 10 July 2015 at 12:05, Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> > Hash: SHA1
>>> >
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> > I've just tried with a fresh git clone of
>>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language.git
>>> > Then I deleted the maven repository and mvn clean install the
>>> > taverna-language-commandline only.
>>> > It all worked OK with a build success.
>>> > What is the maven error when you try mvn clean install?
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> >
>>> > Ian
>>> >
>>> > On 10/07/15 07:28, Menaka Madushanka wrote:
>>> >> Hello, I deleted my local maven repository and updated the project.
>>> >> But it still downloads the 0.15.1 snapshot version. In my pom files
>>> >> its 0.15.0 version.
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers. Menaka.
>>> >>
>>> >> On 8 July 2015 at 16:21, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Hello,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I have changed the comandline pom back to 0.15.0 and the
>>> >>> taverna-language back to depending on 1-incubating-SNAPSHOT. I
>>> >>> have no idea what happened to the version numbers, I think it was
>>> >>> due to the failed release attempt. Hopefully the tavern-language
>>> >>> and commandline should build ok now.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Cheers,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Ian
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Menaka Madushanka
>>> >>> [mailto:menaka12350@gmail.com] Sent: 03 July 2015 17:11 To:
>>> >>> dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release
>>> >>> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hello Ian,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> why does it depend on taverna-language-0.15.1
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I will change it and send a pull request.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Taverna-language-commandline still seems to have build issues
>>> >>>> on its own, this time with scufl2-iwir.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Are there build errors with this module?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Cheers Menaka
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 3 July 2015 at 20:15, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Hello,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Taverna-language-commandline still seems to have build issues
>>> >>>> on its own, this time with scufl2-iwir. Builds fine from
>>> >>>> parent. I thought the build issues had been fixed. I'm not
>>> >>>> going to continue the taverna-language deploy until someone can
>>> >>>> convince me that the dependencies are sorted.....why does it
>>> >>>> depend on taverna-language-0.15.1, is this something to with
>>> >>>> the failed mvn
>>> >>> release:deploy that I mentioned earlier?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Java 8 is also a lot stricter with Javadoc tags which means you
>>> >>>> need to tell the maven Javadoc-plugin not to be so strict, see
>>> >>>>
>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15886209/maven-is-not-working-in-
>>> > ja
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> > va-8-when-javadoc-tags-are-incomplete
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Cheers,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Ian
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: Ian Dunlop
>>> >>>> [mailto:Ian.Dunlop@manchester.ac.uk] Sent: 03 July 2015 15:15
>>> >>>> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE]
>>> >>>> Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Hello,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Can't say I'm having a wonderfully fun time. The
>>> >>>> taverna-language deploy failed at the last second due to an
>>> >>>> upstream conflict and rolling that back is just plain complex.
>>> >>>> Now I find that the taverna-language-commandline is still
>>> >>>> depending on taverna-language 0.15.1 ?? I'm going to stick at
>>> >>>> it and attempt to deploy but someone will need to check if it
>>> >>>> makes sense and possible pick up the pieces
>>> >>> afterwards. Thank goodness for git revert.....
>>> >>>> I'm tempted to slink back into the happy free for all of
>>> >>>> javascript and remember all this as a bad dream.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Cheers,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Ian
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: Christian Brenninkmeijer
>>> >>>> [mailto: christian.brenninkmeijer@manchester.ac.uk] Sent: 03
>>> >>>> July 2015 11:21 To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org Subject:
>>> >>>> RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
>>> >>>> RC2
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I fully agree with Stian.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Go for RC3 and critical to see someone else able to do the
>>> >>>> release manager role
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Christian ________________________________________ From: Stian
>>> >>>> Soiland-Reyes [stain@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015
>>> >>>> 4:20 PM To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re:
>>> >>>> [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> +1 to try an RC3 - the NOTICE and LICENSE should be in a better
>>> >>>> shape
>>> >>> now.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Great that you'll have a go as release manager so we spread the
>>> >>>> skills.. and improve the docs hopefully as I think I assumed
>>> >>>> many things known about the Maven release plugin. :))
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On 1 July 2015 at 15:18, Ian Dunlop
>>> >>>> <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>>> >>>>> Hello,
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I'm going to attempt to make a release based on the info at
>>> >>>> http://taverna.staging.apache.org/community/releasing.
>>> >>>>> I'm waiting for/figuring out how to get
>>> >>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/taverna.asc to update
>>> >>>> itself with my OpenPGP key fingerprint.
>>> >>>>> Wish me luck......
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Cheers,
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Ian
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- From: alaninmcr
>>> >>>>> [mailto:alaninmcr@googlemail.com] Sent: 01 July 2015 14:17
>>> >>>>> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE]
>>> >>>>> Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> On 01/07/2015 14:13, Ian Dunlop wrote:
>>> >>>>>> Hello,
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> A release with the build issues fixed but with the
>>> >>>>>> documentation issues
>>> >>>> added to JIRA.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> So a RC3. Sounds OK to me.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Cheers,
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Ian
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Alan
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> -- Stian Soiland-Reyes Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache
>>> >>>> Commons RDF (incubating) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -- Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena Faculty of Engineering,
>>> >>> <http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng> University of Peradeniyaya. LinkedIn
>>> >>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> > Version: GnuPG v1
>>> >
>>> > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVn6brAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5gOwIALHwWREYgWeyoi2apf32jzua
>>> > bs0yNMSmwosxSIP43qb/67Y/jq0FXz1gSbEVwrJ+dO+h+B6ZnxGFaEiWWiIZTNu3
>>> > QhH++ycACGeG7UyVrCtCWFsLH4fco/YxWOdj6ADwhdCl8y41bKQkmUvdldhK87+q
>>> > qQLBxX6YiIs2j0qnqmOlxVxsSnXUfSd2uUaL44+egwnB1hWTKxxnOGnKSbos7lkj
>>> > 0KDoV+etIuTlgego2KqoVP2zisCcxlaVdxO9BSF09IpraJ3Z187k0PMo3zqAAio7
>>> > oswClwjV7k0H99IBNw4WEDs3uY3dn1woPVHUIOY59+q4EjiXWGvGdAAoaVgnIn4=
>>> > =0LZ4
>>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Stian Soiland-Reyes
>>> Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
>>> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena
>> Faculty of Engineering, <http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng>
>> University of Peradeniyaya.
>> LinkedIn <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena
> Faculty of Engineering, <http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng>
> University of Peradeniyaya.
> LinkedIn <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
>
--
Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena
Faculty of Engineering, <http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng>
University of Peradeniyaya.
LinkedIn <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Menaka Madushanka <me...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
It is building fine....
No problem.
All the functions are working fine. :-)
Cheers
Menaka
On 10 July 2015 at 22:26, Menaka Madushanka <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Stian,
> Thank you very much for the greetings. Hope you are spending happy time in
> the conference....!!! :-)
> Before the version change it worked perfectly.
> After changing the version back to 0.15.0, the project was just like as in
> the screenshot.
>
> But doesn't show where the problem is.
>
> I'm trying to build it again and continue working.
>
> Cheers
> Menaka
>
>
> On 10 July 2015 at 20:38, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Menaka, did you get it building..?
>>
>> Greetings from Dublin. :)
>>
>> On 10 July 2015 at 12:05, Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I've just tried with a fresh git clone of
>> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language.git
>> > Then I deleted the maven repository and mvn clean install the
>> > taverna-language-commandline only.
>> > It all worked OK with a build success.
>> > What is the maven error when you try mvn clean install?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Ian
>> >
>> > On 10/07/15 07:28, Menaka Madushanka wrote:
>> >> Hello, I deleted my local maven repository and updated the project.
>> >> But it still downloads the 0.15.1 snapshot version. In my pom files
>> >> its 0.15.0 version.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers. Menaka.
>> >>
>> >> On 8 July 2015 at 16:21, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hello,
>> >>>
>> >>> I have changed the comandline pom back to 0.15.0 and the
>> >>> taverna-language back to depending on 1-incubating-SNAPSHOT. I
>> >>> have no idea what happened to the version numbers, I think it was
>> >>> due to the failed release attempt. Hopefully the tavern-language
>> >>> and commandline should build ok now.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>>
>> >>> Ian
>> >>>
>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Menaka Madushanka
>> >>> [mailto:menaka12350@gmail.com] Sent: 03 July 2015 17:11 To:
>> >>> dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release
>> >>> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>> >>>
>> >>> Hello Ian,
>> >>>
>> >>> why does it depend on taverna-language-0.15.1
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I will change it and send a pull request.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> Taverna-language-commandline still seems to have build issues
>> >>>> on its own, this time with scufl2-iwir.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Are there build errors with this module?
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers Menaka
>> >>>
>> >>> On 3 July 2015 at 20:15, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hello,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Taverna-language-commandline still seems to have build issues
>> >>>> on its own, this time with scufl2-iwir. Builds fine from
>> >>>> parent. I thought the build issues had been fixed. I'm not
>> >>>> going to continue the taverna-language deploy until someone can
>> >>>> convince me that the dependencies are sorted.....why does it
>> >>>> depend on taverna-language-0.15.1, is this something to with
>> >>>> the failed mvn
>> >>> release:deploy that I mentioned earlier?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Java 8 is also a lot stricter with Javadoc tags which means you
>> >>>> need to tell the maven Javadoc-plugin not to be so strict, see
>> >>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15886209/maven-is-not-working-in-
>> > ja
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> > va-8-when-javadoc-tags-are-incomplete
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ian
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: Ian Dunlop
>> >>>> [mailto:Ian.Dunlop@manchester.ac.uk] Sent: 03 July 2015 15:15
>> >>>> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE]
>> >>>> Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hello,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Can't say I'm having a wonderfully fun time. The
>> >>>> taverna-language deploy failed at the last second due to an
>> >>>> upstream conflict and rolling that back is just plain complex.
>> >>>> Now I find that the taverna-language-commandline is still
>> >>>> depending on taverna-language 0.15.1 ?? I'm going to stick at
>> >>>> it and attempt to deploy but someone will need to check if it
>> >>>> makes sense and possible pick up the pieces
>> >>> afterwards. Thank goodness for git revert.....
>> >>>> I'm tempted to slink back into the happy free for all of
>> >>>> javascript and remember all this as a bad dream.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ian
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: Christian Brenninkmeijer
>> >>>> [mailto: christian.brenninkmeijer@manchester.ac.uk] Sent: 03
>> >>>> July 2015 11:21 To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org Subject:
>> >>>> RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
>> >>>> RC2
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I fully agree with Stian.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Go for RC3 and critical to see someone else able to do the
>> >>>> release manager role
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Christian ________________________________________ From: Stian
>> >>>> Soiland-Reyes [stain@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015
>> >>>> 4:20 PM To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re:
>> >>>> [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>> >>>>
>> >>>> +1 to try an RC3 - the NOTICE and LICENSE should be in a better
>> >>>> shape
>> >>> now.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Great that you'll have a go as release manager so we spread the
>> >>>> skills.. and improve the docs hopefully as I think I assumed
>> >>>> many things known about the Maven release plugin. :))
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 1 July 2015 at 15:18, Ian Dunlop
>> >>>> <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>> >>>>> Hello,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I'm going to attempt to make a release based on the info at
>> >>>> http://taverna.staging.apache.org/community/releasing.
>> >>>>> I'm waiting for/figuring out how to get
>> >>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/taverna.asc to update
>> >>>> itself with my OpenPGP key fingerprint.
>> >>>>> Wish me luck......
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Ian
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- From: alaninmcr
>> >>>>> [mailto:alaninmcr@googlemail.com] Sent: 01 July 2015 14:17
>> >>>>> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE]
>> >>>>> Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 01/07/2015 14:13, Ian Dunlop wrote:
>> >>>>>> Hello,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> A release with the build issues fixed but with the
>> >>>>>> documentation issues
>> >>>> added to JIRA.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> So a RC3. Sounds OK to me.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Ian
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Alan
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -- Stian Soiland-Reyes Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache
>> >>>> Commons RDF (incubating) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> -- Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena Faculty of Engineering,
>> >>> <http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng> University of Peradeniyaya. LinkedIn
>> >>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > Version: GnuPG v1
>> >
>> > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVn6brAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5gOwIALHwWREYgWeyoi2apf32jzua
>> > bs0yNMSmwosxSIP43qb/67Y/jq0FXz1gSbEVwrJ+dO+h+B6ZnxGFaEiWWiIZTNu3
>> > QhH++ycACGeG7UyVrCtCWFsLH4fco/YxWOdj6ADwhdCl8y41bKQkmUvdldhK87+q
>> > qQLBxX6YiIs2j0qnqmOlxVxsSnXUfSd2uUaL44+egwnB1hWTKxxnOGnKSbos7lkj
>> > 0KDoV+etIuTlgego2KqoVP2zisCcxlaVdxO9BSF09IpraJ3Z187k0PMo3zqAAio7
>> > oswClwjV7k0H99IBNw4WEDs3uY3dn1woPVHUIOY59+q4EjiXWGvGdAAoaVgnIn4=
>> > =0LZ4
>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Stian Soiland-Reyes
>> Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
>> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena
> Faculty of Engineering, <http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng>
> University of Peradeniyaya.
> LinkedIn <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
>
--
Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena
Faculty of Engineering, <http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng>
University of Peradeniyaya.
LinkedIn <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I've just tried with a fresh git clone of
https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language.git
Then I deleted the maven repository and mvn clean install the
taverna-language-commandline only.
It all worked OK with a build success.
What is the maven error when you try mvn clean install?
Cheers,
Ian
On 10/07/15 07:28, Menaka Madushanka wrote:
> Hello, I deleted my local maven repository and updated the project.
> But it still downloads the 0.15.1 snapshot version. In my pom files
> its 0.15.0 version.
>
> Cheers. Menaka.
>
> On 8 July 2015 at 16:21, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have changed the comandline pom back to 0.15.0 and the
>> taverna-language back to depending on 1-incubating-SNAPSHOT. I
>> have no idea what happened to the version numbers, I think it was
>> due to the failed release attempt. Hopefully the tavern-language
>> and commandline should build ok now.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Ian
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Menaka Madushanka
>> [mailto:menaka12350@gmail.com] Sent: 03 July 2015 17:11 To:
>> dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release
>> Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>>
>> Hello Ian,
>>
>> why does it depend on taverna-language-0.15.1
>>
>>
>> I will change it and send a pull request.
>>
>>
>>> Taverna-language-commandline still seems to have build issues
>>> on its own, this time with scufl2-iwir.
>>
>>
>> Are there build errors with this module?
>>
>> Cheers Menaka
>>
>> On 3 July 2015 at 20:15, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Taverna-language-commandline still seems to have build issues
>>> on its own, this time with scufl2-iwir. Builds fine from
>>> parent. I thought the build issues had been fixed. I'm not
>>> going to continue the taverna-language deploy until someone can
>>> convince me that the dependencies are sorted.....why does it
>>> depend on taverna-language-0.15.1, is this something to with
>>> the failed mvn
>> release:deploy that I mentioned earlier?
>>>
>>> Java 8 is also a lot stricter with Javadoc tags which means you
>>> need to tell the maven Javadoc-plugin not to be so strict, see
>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15886209/maven-is-not-working-in-
ja
>>>
>>>
va-8-when-javadoc-tags-are-incomplete
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Ian Dunlop
>>> [mailto:Ian.Dunlop@manchester.ac.uk] Sent: 03 July 2015 15:15
>>> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE]
>>> Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Can't say I'm having a wonderfully fun time. The
>>> taverna-language deploy failed at the last second due to an
>>> upstream conflict and rolling that back is just plain complex.
>>> Now I find that the taverna-language-commandline is still
>>> depending on taverna-language 0.15.1 ?? I'm going to stick at
>>> it and attempt to deploy but someone will need to check if it
>>> makes sense and possible pick up the pieces
>> afterwards. Thank goodness for git revert.....
>>> I'm tempted to slink back into the happy free for all of
>>> javascript and remember all this as a bad dream.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Christian Brenninkmeijer
>>> [mailto: christian.brenninkmeijer@manchester.ac.uk] Sent: 03
>>> July 2015 11:21 To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org Subject:
>>> RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
>>> RC2
>>>
>>> I fully agree with Stian.
>>>
>>> Go for RC3 and critical to see someone else able to do the
>>> release manager role
>>>
>>> Christian ________________________________________ From: Stian
>>> Soiland-Reyes [stain@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015
>>> 4:20 PM To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re:
>>> [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>>>
>>> +1 to try an RC3 - the NOTICE and LICENSE should be in a better
>>> shape
>> now.
>>>
>>> Great that you'll have a go as release manager so we spread the
>>> skills.. and improve the docs hopefully as I think I assumed
>>> many things known about the Maven release plugin. :))
>>>
>>> On 1 July 2015 at 15:18, Ian Dunlop
>>> <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I'm going to attempt to make a release based on the info at
>>> http://taverna.staging.apache.org/community/releasing.
>>>> I'm waiting for/figuring out how to get
>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/taverna.asc to update
>>> itself with my OpenPGP key fingerprint.
>>>> Wish me luck......
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message----- From: alaninmcr
>>>> [mailto:alaninmcr@googlemail.com] Sent: 01 July 2015 14:17
>>>> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE]
>>>> Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>>>>
>>>> On 01/07/2015 14:13, Ian Dunlop wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> A release with the build issues fixed but with the
>>>>> documentation issues
>>> added to JIRA.
>>>>
>>>> So a RC3. Sounds OK to me.
>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>> Alan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Stian Soiland-Reyes Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache
>>> Commons RDF (incubating) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena Faculty of Engineering,
>> <http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng> University of Peradeniyaya. LinkedIn
>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
>>
>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVn6brAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5gOwIALHwWREYgWeyoi2apf32jzua
bs0yNMSmwosxSIP43qb/67Y/jq0FXz1gSbEVwrJ+dO+h+B6ZnxGFaEiWWiIZTNu3
QhH++ycACGeG7UyVrCtCWFsLH4fco/YxWOdj6ADwhdCl8y41bKQkmUvdldhK87+q
qQLBxX6YiIs2j0qnqmOlxVxsSnXUfSd2uUaL44+egwnB1hWTKxxnOGnKSbos7lkj
0KDoV+etIuTlgego2KqoVP2zisCcxlaVdxO9BSF09IpraJ3Z187k0PMo3zqAAio7
oswClwjV7k0H99IBNw4WEDs3uY3dn1woPVHUIOY59+q4EjiXWGvGdAAoaVgnIn4=
=0LZ4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Menaka Madushanka <me...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
I deleted my local maven repository and updated the project. But it still
downloads the 0.15.1 snapshot version.
In my pom files its 0.15.0 version.
Cheers.
Menaka.
On 8 July 2015 at 16:21, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have changed the comandline pom back to 0.15.0 and the taverna-language
> back to depending on 1-incubating-SNAPSHOT. I have no idea what happened to
> the version numbers, I think it was due to the failed release attempt.
> Hopefully the tavern-language and commandline should build ok now.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Menaka Madushanka [mailto:menaka12350@gmail.com]
> Sent: 03 July 2015 17:11
> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>
> Hello Ian,
>
> why does it depend on taverna-language-0.15.1
>
>
> I will change it and send a pull request.
>
>
> > Taverna-language-commandline still seems to have build issues on its
> > own, this time with scufl2-iwir.
>
>
> Are there build errors with this module?
>
> Cheers
> Menaka
>
> On 3 July 2015 at 20:15, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Taverna-language-commandline still seems to have build issues on its
> > own, this time with scufl2-iwir. Builds fine from parent. I thought
> > the build issues had been fixed. I'm not going to continue the
> > taverna-language deploy until someone can convince me that the
> > dependencies are sorted.....why does it depend on
> > taverna-language-0.15.1, is this something to with the failed mvn
> release:deploy that I mentioned earlier?
> >
> > Java 8 is also a lot stricter with Javadoc tags which means you need
> > to tell the maven Javadoc-plugin not to be so strict, see
> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15886209/maven-is-not-working-in-ja
> > va-8-when-javadoc-tags-are-incomplete
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ian Dunlop [mailto:Ian.Dunlop@manchester.ac.uk]
> > Sent: 03 July 2015 15:15
> > To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
> > RC2
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Can't say I'm having a wonderfully fun time. The taverna-language
> > deploy failed at the last second due to an upstream conflict and
> > rolling that back is just plain complex. Now I find that the
> > taverna-language-commandline is still depending on taverna-language
> > 0.15.1 ?? I'm going to stick at it and attempt to deploy but someone
> > will need to check if it makes sense and possible pick up the pieces
> afterwards. Thank goodness for git revert.....
> > I'm tempted to slink back into the happy free for all of javascript
> > and remember all this as a bad dream.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christian Brenninkmeijer [mailto:
> > christian.brenninkmeijer@manchester.ac.uk]
> > Sent: 03 July 2015 11:21
> > To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
> > RC2
> >
> > I fully agree with Stian.
> >
> > Go for RC3 and critical to see someone else able to do the release
> > manager role
> >
> > Christian
> > ________________________________________
> > From: Stian Soiland-Reyes [stain@apache.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 4:20 PM
> > To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
> > RC2
> >
> > +1 to try an RC3 - the NOTICE and LICENSE should be in a better shape
> now.
> >
> > Great that you'll have a go as release manager so we spread the skills..
> > and improve the docs hopefully as I think I assumed many things known
> > about the Maven release plugin. :))
> >
> > On 1 July 2015 at 15:18, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm going to attempt to make a release based on the info at
> > http://taverna.staging.apache.org/community/releasing.
> > > I'm waiting for/figuring out how to get
> > https://people.apache.org/keys/group/taverna.asc to update itself with
> > my OpenPGP key fingerprint.
> > > Wish me luck......
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Ian
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: alaninmcr [mailto:alaninmcr@googlemail.com]
> > > Sent: 01 July 2015 14:17
> > > To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language
> > > 0.15.0-incubating
> > > RC2
> > >
> > > On 01/07/2015 14:13, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> A release with the build issues fixed but with the documentation
> > >> issues
> > added to JIRA.
> > >
> > > So a RC3. Sounds OK to me.
> > >
> > >> Cheers,
> > >>
> > >> Ian
> > >
> > > Alan
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Stian Soiland-Reyes
> > Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
> > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena
> Faculty of Engineering, <http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng> University of
> Peradeniyaya.
> LinkedIn <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
>
--
Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena
Faculty of Engineering, <http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng>
University of Peradeniyaya.
LinkedIn <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
Hello,
I have changed the comandline pom back to 0.15.0 and the taverna-language back to depending on 1-incubating-SNAPSHOT. I have no idea what happened to the version numbers, I think it was due to the failed release attempt. Hopefully the tavern-language and commandline should build ok now.
Cheers,
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: Menaka Madushanka [mailto:menaka12350@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 July 2015 17:11
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Hello Ian,
why does it depend on taverna-language-0.15.1
I will change it and send a pull request.
> Taverna-language-commandline still seems to have build issues on its
> own, this time with scufl2-iwir.
Are there build errors with this module?
Cheers
Menaka
On 3 July 2015 at 20:15, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Taverna-language-commandline still seems to have build issues on its
> own, this time with scufl2-iwir. Builds fine from parent. I thought
> the build issues had been fixed. I'm not going to continue the
> taverna-language deploy until someone can convince me that the
> dependencies are sorted.....why does it depend on
> taverna-language-0.15.1, is this something to with the failed mvn release:deploy that I mentioned earlier?
>
> Java 8 is also a lot stricter with Javadoc tags which means you need
> to tell the maven Javadoc-plugin not to be so strict, see
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15886209/maven-is-not-working-in-ja
> va-8-when-javadoc-tags-are-incomplete
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Dunlop [mailto:Ian.Dunlop@manchester.ac.uk]
> Sent: 03 July 2015 15:15
> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
> RC2
>
> Hello,
>
> Can't say I'm having a wonderfully fun time. The taverna-language
> deploy failed at the last second due to an upstream conflict and
> rolling that back is just plain complex. Now I find that the
> taverna-language-commandline is still depending on taverna-language
> 0.15.1 ?? I'm going to stick at it and attempt to deploy but someone
> will need to check if it makes sense and possible pick up the pieces afterwards. Thank goodness for git revert.....
> I'm tempted to slink back into the happy free for all of javascript
> and remember all this as a bad dream.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Brenninkmeijer [mailto:
> christian.brenninkmeijer@manchester.ac.uk]
> Sent: 03 July 2015 11:21
> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
> RC2
>
> I fully agree with Stian.
>
> Go for RC3 and critical to see someone else able to do the release
> manager role
>
> Christian
> ________________________________________
> From: Stian Soiland-Reyes [stain@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 4:20 PM
> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
> RC2
>
> +1 to try an RC3 - the NOTICE and LICENSE should be in a better shape now.
>
> Great that you'll have a go as release manager so we spread the skills..
> and improve the docs hopefully as I think I assumed many things known
> about the Maven release plugin. :))
>
> On 1 July 2015 at 15:18, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm going to attempt to make a release based on the info at
> http://taverna.staging.apache.org/community/releasing.
> > I'm waiting for/figuring out how to get
> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/taverna.asc to update itself with
> my OpenPGP key fingerprint.
> > Wish me luck......
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: alaninmcr [mailto:alaninmcr@googlemail.com]
> > Sent: 01 July 2015 14:17
> > To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language
> > 0.15.0-incubating
> > RC2
> >
> > On 01/07/2015 14:13, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> A release with the build issues fixed but with the documentation
> >> issues
> added to JIRA.
> >
> > So a RC3. Sounds OK to me.
> >
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Ian
> >
> > Alan
>
>
>
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes
> Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>
--
Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena
Faculty of Engineering, <http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng> University of Peradeniyaya.
LinkedIn <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Menaka Madushanka <me...@gmail.com>.
Hello Ian,
why does it depend on taverna-language-0.15.1
I will change it and send a pull request.
> Taverna-language-commandline still seems to have build issues on its
> own, this time with scufl2-iwir.
Are there build errors with this module?
Cheers
Menaka
On 3 July 2015 at 20:15, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Taverna-language-commandline still seems to have build issues on its own,
> this time with scufl2-iwir. Builds fine from parent. I thought the build
> issues had been fixed. I'm not going to continue the taverna-language
> deploy until someone can convince me that the dependencies are
> sorted.....why does it depend on taverna-language-0.15.1, is this something
> to with the failed mvn release:deploy that I mentioned earlier?
>
> Java 8 is also a lot stricter with Javadoc tags which means you need to
> tell the maven Javadoc-plugin not to be so strict, see
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15886209/maven-is-not-working-in-java-8-when-javadoc-tags-are-incomplete
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Dunlop [mailto:Ian.Dunlop@manchester.ac.uk]
> Sent: 03 July 2015 15:15
> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>
> Hello,
>
> Can't say I'm having a wonderfully fun time. The taverna-language deploy
> failed at the last second due to an upstream conflict and rolling that back
> is just plain complex. Now I find that the taverna-language-commandline is
> still depending on taverna-language 0.15.1 ?? I'm going to stick at it and
> attempt to deploy but someone will need to check if it makes sense and
> possible pick up the pieces afterwards. Thank goodness for git revert.....
> I'm tempted to slink back into the happy free for all of javascript and
> remember all this as a bad dream.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Brenninkmeijer [mailto:
> christian.brenninkmeijer@manchester.ac.uk]
> Sent: 03 July 2015 11:21
> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>
> I fully agree with Stian.
>
> Go for RC3 and critical to see someone else able to do the release manager
> role
>
> Christian
> ________________________________________
> From: Stian Soiland-Reyes [stain@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 4:20 PM
> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>
> +1 to try an RC3 - the NOTICE and LICENSE should be in a better shape now.
>
> Great that you'll have a go as release manager so we spread the skills..
> and improve the docs hopefully as I think I assumed many things known about
> the Maven release plugin. :))
>
> On 1 July 2015 at 15:18, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm going to attempt to make a release based on the info at
> http://taverna.staging.apache.org/community/releasing.
> > I'm waiting for/figuring out how to get
> https://people.apache.org/keys/group/taverna.asc to update itself with my
> OpenPGP key fingerprint.
> > Wish me luck......
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: alaninmcr [mailto:alaninmcr@googlemail.com]
> > Sent: 01 July 2015 14:17
> > To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
> > RC2
> >
> > On 01/07/2015 14:13, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> A release with the build issues fixed but with the documentation issues
> added to JIRA.
> >
> > So a RC3. Sounds OK to me.
> >
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Ian
> >
> > Alan
>
>
>
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes
> Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>
--
Menaka Madushanka Jayawardena
Faculty of Engineering, <http://www.pdn.ac.lk/eng>
University of Peradeniyaya.
LinkedIn <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/menakajayawardena>
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
Hello,
Taverna-language-commandline still seems to have build issues on its own, this time with scufl2-iwir. Builds fine from parent. I thought the build issues had been fixed. I'm not going to continue the taverna-language deploy until someone can convince me that the dependencies are sorted.....why does it depend on taverna-language-0.15.1, is this something to with the failed mvn release:deploy that I mentioned earlier?
Java 8 is also a lot stricter with Javadoc tags which means you need to tell the maven Javadoc-plugin not to be so strict, see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15886209/maven-is-not-working-in-java-8-when-javadoc-tags-are-incomplete
Cheers,
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Dunlop [mailto:Ian.Dunlop@manchester.ac.uk]
Sent: 03 July 2015 15:15
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Hello,
Can't say I'm having a wonderfully fun time. The taverna-language deploy failed at the last second due to an upstream conflict and rolling that back is just plain complex. Now I find that the taverna-language-commandline is still depending on taverna-language 0.15.1 ?? I'm going to stick at it and attempt to deploy but someone will need to check if it makes sense and possible pick up the pieces afterwards. Thank goodness for git revert.....
I'm tempted to slink back into the happy free for all of javascript and remember all this as a bad dream.
Cheers,
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Brenninkmeijer [mailto:christian.brenninkmeijer@manchester.ac.uk]
Sent: 03 July 2015 11:21
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
I fully agree with Stian.
Go for RC3 and critical to see someone else able to do the release manager role
Christian
________________________________________
From: Stian Soiland-Reyes [stain@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 4:20 PM
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
+1 to try an RC3 - the NOTICE and LICENSE should be in a better shape now.
Great that you'll have a go as release manager so we spread the skills.. and improve the docs hopefully as I think I assumed many things known about the Maven release plugin. :))
On 1 July 2015 at 15:18, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm going to attempt to make a release based on the info at http://taverna.staging.apache.org/community/releasing.
> I'm waiting for/figuring out how to get https://people.apache.org/keys/group/taverna.asc to update itself with my OpenPGP key fingerprint.
> Wish me luck......
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alaninmcr [mailto:alaninmcr@googlemail.com]
> Sent: 01 July 2015 14:17
> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
> RC2
>
> On 01/07/2015 14:13, Ian Dunlop wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> A release with the build issues fixed but with the documentation issues added to JIRA.
>
> So a RC3. Sounds OK to me.
>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Ian
>
> Alan
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
Hello,
Can't say I'm having a wonderfully fun time. The taverna-language deploy failed at the last second due to an upstream conflict and rolling that back is just plain complex. Now I find that the taverna-language-commandline is still depending on taverna-language 0.15.1 ?? I'm going to stick at it and attempt to deploy but someone will need to check if it makes sense and possible pick up the pieces afterwards. Thank goodness for git revert.....
I'm tempted to slink back into the happy free for all of javascript and remember all this as a bad dream.
Cheers,
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Brenninkmeijer [mailto:christian.brenninkmeijer@manchester.ac.uk]
Sent: 03 July 2015 11:21
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
I fully agree with Stian.
Go for RC3 and critical to see someone else able to do the release manager role
Christian
________________________________________
From: Stian Soiland-Reyes [stain@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 4:20 PM
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
+1 to try an RC3 - the NOTICE and LICENSE should be in a better shape now.
Great that you'll have a go as release manager so we spread the skills.. and improve the docs hopefully as I think I assumed many things known about the Maven release plugin. :))
On 1 July 2015 at 15:18, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm going to attempt to make a release based on the info at http://taverna.staging.apache.org/community/releasing.
> I'm waiting for/figuring out how to get https://people.apache.org/keys/group/taverna.asc to update itself with my OpenPGP key fingerprint.
> Wish me luck......
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alaninmcr [mailto:alaninmcr@googlemail.com]
> Sent: 01 July 2015 14:17
> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
> RC2
>
> On 01/07/2015 14:13, Ian Dunlop wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> A release with the build issues fixed but with the documentation issues added to JIRA.
>
> So a RC3. Sounds OK to me.
>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Ian
>
> Alan
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Christian Brenninkmeijer <ch...@manchester.ac.uk>.
I fully agree with Stian.
Go for RC3 and critical to see someone else able to do the release manager role
Christian
________________________________________
From: Stian Soiland-Reyes [stain@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 4:20 PM
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
+1 to try an RC3 - the NOTICE and LICENSE should be in a better shape now.
Great that you'll have a go as release manager so we spread the
skills.. and improve the docs hopefully as I think I assumed many
things known about the Maven release plugin. :))
On 1 July 2015 at 15:18, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm going to attempt to make a release based on the info at http://taverna.staging.apache.org/community/releasing.
> I'm waiting for/figuring out how to get https://people.apache.org/keys/group/taverna.asc to update itself with my OpenPGP key fingerprint.
> Wish me luck......
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alaninmcr [mailto:alaninmcr@googlemail.com]
> Sent: 01 July 2015 14:17
> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>
> On 01/07/2015 14:13, Ian Dunlop wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> A release with the build issues fixed but with the documentation issues added to JIRA.
>
> So a RC3. Sounds OK to me.
>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Ian
>
> Alan
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
+1 to try an RC3 - the NOTICE and LICENSE should be in a better shape now.
Great that you'll have a go as release manager so we spread the
skills.. and improve the docs hopefully as I think I assumed many
things known about the Maven release plugin. :))
On 1 July 2015 at 15:18, Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm going to attempt to make a release based on the info at http://taverna.staging.apache.org/community/releasing.
> I'm waiting for/figuring out how to get https://people.apache.org/keys/group/taverna.asc to update itself with my OpenPGP key fingerprint.
> Wish me luck......
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alaninmcr [mailto:alaninmcr@googlemail.com]
> Sent: 01 July 2015 14:17
> To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
>
> On 01/07/2015 14:13, Ian Dunlop wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> A release with the build issues fixed but with the documentation issues added to JIRA.
>
> So a RC3. Sounds OK to me.
>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Ian
>
> Alan
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
Hello,
I'm going to attempt to make a release based on the info at http://taverna.staging.apache.org/community/releasing.
I'm waiting for/figuring out how to get https://people.apache.org/keys/group/taverna.asc to update itself with my OpenPGP key fingerprint.
Wish me luck......
Cheers,
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: alaninmcr [mailto:alaninmcr@googlemail.com]
Sent: 01 July 2015 14:17
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
On 01/07/2015 14:13, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A release with the build issues fixed but with the documentation issues added to JIRA.
So a RC3. Sounds OK to me.
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
Alan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by alaninmcr <al...@googlemail.com>.
On 01/07/2015 14:13, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A release with the build issues fixed but with the documentation issues added to JIRA.
So a RC3. Sounds OK to me.
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
Alan
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
Hello,
A release with the build issues fixed but with the documentation issues added to JIRA.
Cheers,
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: alaninmcr [mailto:alaninmcr@googlemail.com]
Sent: 01 July 2015 14:06
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
On 01/07/2015 13:24, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It's been a few days since we discussed the possible release of Apache
> Taverna Language incubator. Since then we have corrected many build
> issues and identified areas where documentation (NOTICE, LICENSE and
> README) can be improved. I don't think that any of the documentation
> issues are enough to stop us going ahead with the release and the fact
> that we identified build issues and corrected them shows that the
> release process is working. I believe that we should go ahead with the
> release while adding the documentation issues to JIRA so that we can
> fix them when we have time to do so.
I'm confused as to if you are suggesting going ahead with the 0.15.0-incubating RC2 with the known build issues (and documentation issues), or a release with the build issues fixed but still with the documentation issues.
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
Alan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by alaninmcr <al...@googlemail.com>.
On 01/07/2015 13:24, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It's been a few days since we discussed the possible release of
> Apache Taverna Language incubator. Since then we have corrected many
> build issues and identified areas where documentation (NOTICE,
> LICENSE and README) can be improved. I don't think that any of the
> documentation issues are enough to stop us going ahead with the
> release and the fact that we identified build issues and corrected
> them shows that the release process is working. I believe that we
> should go ahead with the release while adding the documentation
> issues to JIRA so that we can fix them when we have time to do so.
I'm confused as to if you are suggesting going ahead with the
0.15.0-incubating RC2 with the known build issues (and documentation
issues), or a release with the build issues fixed but still with the
documentation issues.
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
Alan
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
Hello,
It's been a few days since we discussed the possible release of Apache Taverna Language incubator. Since then we have corrected many build issues and identified areas where documentation (NOTICE, LICENSE and README) can be improved. I don't think that any of the documentation issues are enough to stop us going ahead with the release and the fact that we identified build issues and corrected them shows that the release process is working. I believe that we should go ahead with the release while adding the documentation issues to JIRA so that we can fix them when we have time to do so.
Cheers,
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:andy@apache.org]
Sent: 25 June 2015 22:46
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
On 24/06/15 13:45, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have removed the hardcoded junit, commons-io and airlift versions from the projects I mentioned yesterday and merged a pull request (which I generated!).
>
> This raises a question about what is best practice if you are already a committer. I don't really want to push straight to master since I would always like someone to give my changes a quick look. This is why I forked the github repos and raised the pull requests. Is this sensible or should I change master or create a new branch or........what is the 'apache' way to do things.
>
You, the Taverna community, get to decide.
Andy
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 24/06/15 13:45, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have removed the hardcoded junit, commons-io and airlift versions from the projects I mentioned yesterday and merged a pull request (which I generated!).
>
> This raises a question about what is best practice if you are already a committer. I don't really want to push straight to master since I would always like someone to give my changes a quick look. This is why I forked the github repos and raised the pull requests. Is this sensible or should I change master or create a new branch or........what is the 'apache' way to do things.
>
You, the Taverna community, get to decide.
Andy
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
Hello,
I have removed the hardcoded junit, commons-io and airlift versions from the projects I mentioned yesterday and merged a pull request (which I generated!).
This raises a question about what is best practice if you are already a committer. I don't really want to push straight to master since I would always like someone to give my changes a quick look. This is why I forked the github repos and raised the pull requests. Is this sensible or should I change master or create a new branch or........what is the 'apache' way to do things.
Cheers,
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:andy@apache.org]
Sent: 24 June 2015 09:35
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
On 23/06/15 15:32, Christian Brenninkmeijer wrote:
> By itself a few hardcoded version numbers are NOT reason to delay a release.
>
> But making sure the license ect are Apache consistent are.
> I leave it to others who know the Apache rules better than me to judge if these are incorrect.
> Which is why my vote is none binding
>
> Christian
The real decision for a release comes down to the release manager and community norms.
The requirements for a release vote are majority of PMC, be legally clean, and at least 3 +1 PMC but that's just the foundation minimum.
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
For example, many (most?) projects require the code to be buildable, code to be tagged, tests pass - whatever the community here decides.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice
It is the release managers decision.
Once over and above the minimum, they decide whether to respond to comments, whether to redo a release, what to fix, what to leave until next time.
Binding/non-binding:
"Binding" would mean PMC.
In the incubator, the release eventually needs a Incubator PMC release vote. That is best if it is more of a "please check our process".
The PPMC should act like a PMC even if it does not yet count as such.
It's part of showing a project is ready to graduate.
There is the -0 vote: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't do this.' Counting wise, it's a 0.
Fractions when determining majority are "unclear" and mainly for indicative points in discussions.
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Discuss.
Andy
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 23/06/15 15:32, Christian Brenninkmeijer wrote:
> By itself a few hardcoded version numbers are NOT reason to delay a release.
>
> But making sure the license ect are Apache consistent are.
> I leave it to others who know the Apache rules better than me to judge if these are incorrect.
> Which is why my vote is none binding
>
> Christian
The real decision for a release comes down to the release manager and
community norms.
The requirements for a release vote are majority of PMC, be legally
clean, and at least 3 +1 PMC but that's just the foundation minimum.
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
For example, many (most?) projects require the code to be buildable,
code to be tagged, tests pass - whatever the community here decides.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice
It is the release managers decision.
Once over and above the minimum, they decide whether to respond to
comments, whether to redo a release, what to fix, what to leave until
next time.
Binding/non-binding:
"Binding" would mean PMC.
In the incubator, the release eventually needs a Incubator PMC release
vote. That is best if it is more of a "please check our process".
The PPMC should act like a PMC even if it does not yet count as such.
It's part of showing a project is ready to graduate.
There is the -0 vote: 'I won't get in the way, but I'd rather we didn't
do this.' Counting wise, it's a 0.
Fractions when determining majority are "unclear" and mainly for
indicative points in discussions.
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Discuss.
Andy
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Christian Brenninkmeijer <ch...@manchester.ac.uk>.
By itself a few hardcoded version numbers are NOT reason to delay a release.
But making sure the license ect are Apache consistent are.
I leave it to others who know the Apache rules better than me to judge if these are incorrect.
Which is why my vote is none binding
Christian
________________________________________
From: Ian Dunlop [Ian.Dunlop@manchester.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 3:24 PM
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Hello,
So based on Christians comment I had a quick look. In taverna-scufl2-examples junit is 4.4, commons-io is 2.1 and jaxm-imp is 2.2.4-1. In taverna parent they are 4.11 and 2.4 and 2.2.11.
There is also io.airlift 0.7 in taverna-language-commandline with no mention in the parent.
Taverna-scufl2-wfdesc has a few dependencies with version numbers.
Is there a reason for all this or just an oversight. I'm actually impressed that there are not more.
Is this a good enough reason to delay an incubator release?
Cheers,
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Brenninkmeijer [mailto:christian.brenninkmeijer@manchester.ac.uk]
Sent: 23 June 2015 14:26
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
I regret but I have to vote:
-1 non binding
My main reason for this is the existence of hard code depency numbers.
As we are using taverna parent to provided version numbers this should be done completely consistant.
Some place hard coded numbers where found are taverna-scufl2-examples
Also several poms have hard coded number in the <build> section.
This is less critical but why not be consistant.
I also read comments regarding Licence, notice disclaimer ect which should be address in this the first release.
On the plus side the code did build and test.
I noticed that Baclava support was still included and wondered why?
Should this package and the classes at the very least not be marked Depricated?
Christian
________________________________________
From: Stian Soiland-Reyes [stain@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 3:48 PM
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
Apache Taverna Language is a set of APIs for workflow definitions (SCUFL2) and workflow inputs/outputs/run (DataBundle), as consumed and produced by the Apache Taverna workflow system. The API includes support for working with Research Object Bundles, and loading/saving Taverna workflows in different formats.
The release candidates to be voted over are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-parent-1-incubating-RC2/
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-RC2/
SHA-1 checksums:
8199880048a59cde622e0caa24c3bc3d83bc5d5a
taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
7032e9d2be834f7c029aae562b62613481bf6939
taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
MD5 checksums:
7f9b107b9f1dc0407783ac0ad484d6ea
taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
35d3085b596b2dd4b30a0234259efade
taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
Build the release candidate in the above order, using:
mvn clean install
The release candidates correspond to the following git commits:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-maven-parent.git;a=commit;h=3ba669c78782d3fc3b548e2a512d201ee922b34a
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-language.git;a=commit;h=3340e2090e604b40ac0b88675f57c1d12032d060
Release candidates are signed with a GPG key available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/taverna/KEYS
A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetaverna-1003/
The changelog for this release is available from JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332247
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332246
Please vote on releasing these packages as:
Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
Apache Taverna Language 0.1.0-incubating
The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three +1 Apache Taverna PPMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers, please feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your votes.
(Before anyone asks, RC1 was a release candidate tag I dropped as it used an older Apache super-pom)
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Ian Dunlop <Ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
Hello,
So based on Christians comment I had a quick look. In taverna-scufl2-examples junit is 4.4, commons-io is 2.1 and jaxm-imp is 2.2.4-1. In taverna parent they are 4.11 and 2.4 and 2.2.11.
There is also io.airlift 0.7 in taverna-language-commandline with no mention in the parent.
Taverna-scufl2-wfdesc has a few dependencies with version numbers.
Is there a reason for all this or just an oversight. I'm actually impressed that there are not more.
Is this a good enough reason to delay an incubator release?
Cheers,
Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Brenninkmeijer [mailto:christian.brenninkmeijer@manchester.ac.uk]
Sent: 23 June 2015 14:26
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
I regret but I have to vote:
-1 non binding
My main reason for this is the existence of hard code depency numbers.
As we are using taverna parent to provided version numbers this should be done completely consistant.
Some place hard coded numbers where found are taverna-scufl2-examples
Also several poms have hard coded number in the <build> section.
This is less critical but why not be consistant.
I also read comments regarding Licence, notice disclaimer ect which should be address in this the first release.
On the plus side the code did build and test.
I noticed that Baclava support was still included and wondered why?
Should this package and the classes at the very least not be marked Depricated?
Christian
________________________________________
From: Stian Soiland-Reyes [stain@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 3:48 PM
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
Apache Taverna Language is a set of APIs for workflow definitions (SCUFL2) and workflow inputs/outputs/run (DataBundle), as consumed and produced by the Apache Taverna workflow system. The API includes support for working with Research Object Bundles, and loading/saving Taverna workflows in different formats.
The release candidates to be voted over are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-parent-1-incubating-RC2/
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-RC2/
SHA-1 checksums:
8199880048a59cde622e0caa24c3bc3d83bc5d5a
taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
7032e9d2be834f7c029aae562b62613481bf6939
taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
MD5 checksums:
7f9b107b9f1dc0407783ac0ad484d6ea
taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
35d3085b596b2dd4b30a0234259efade
taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
Build the release candidate in the above order, using:
mvn clean install
The release candidates correspond to the following git commits:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-maven-parent.git;a=commit;h=3ba669c78782d3fc3b548e2a512d201ee922b34a
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-language.git;a=commit;h=3340e2090e604b40ac0b88675f57c1d12032d060
Release candidates are signed with a GPG key available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/taverna/KEYS
A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetaverna-1003/
The changelog for this release is available from JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332247
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332246
Please vote on releasing these packages as:
Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
Apache Taverna Language 0.1.0-incubating
The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three +1 Apache Taverna PPMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers, please feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your votes.
(Before anyone asks, RC1 was a release candidate tag I dropped as it used an older Apache super-pom)
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Christian Brenninkmeijer <ch...@manchester.ac.uk>.
I regret but I have to vote:
-1 non binding
My main reason for this is the existence of hard code depency numbers.
As we are using taverna parent to provided version numbers this should be done completely consistant.
Some place hard coded numbers where found are
taverna-scufl2-examples
Also several poms have hard coded number in the <build> section.
This is less critical but why not be consistant.
I also read comments regarding Licence, notice disclaimer ect which should be address in this the first release.
On the plus side the code did build and test.
I noticed that Baclava support was still included and wondered why?
Should this package and the classes at the very least not be marked Depricated?
Christian
________________________________________
From: Stian Soiland-Reyes [stain@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 3:48 PM
To: dev@taverna.incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating RC2
I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of
Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
Apache Taverna Language 0.15.0-incubating
Apache Taverna Language is a set of APIs for workflow definitions (SCUFL2)
and workflow inputs/outputs/run (DataBundle), as consumed and produced by the
Apache Taverna workflow system. The API includes support for working with
Research Object Bundles, and loading/saving Taverna workflows in different
formats.
The release candidates to be voted over are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-parent-1-incubating-RC2/
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/taverna/source/taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-RC2/
SHA-1 checksums:
8199880048a59cde622e0caa24c3bc3d83bc5d5a
taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
7032e9d2be834f7c029aae562b62613481bf6939
taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
MD5 checksums:
7f9b107b9f1dc0407783ac0ad484d6ea
taverna-parent-1-incubating-source-release.zip
35d3085b596b2dd4b30a0234259efade
taverna-language-0.15.0-incubating-source-release.zip
Build the release candidate in the above order, using:
mvn clean install
The release candidates correspond to the following git commits:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-maven-parent.git;a=commit;h=3ba669c78782d3fc3b548e2a512d201ee922b34a
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-taverna-language.git;a=commit;h=3340e2090e604b40ac0b88675f57c1d12032d060
Release candidates are signed with a GPG key available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/taverna/KEYS
A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetaverna-1003/
The changelog for this release is available from JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332247
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318322&version=12332246
Please vote on releasing these packages as:
Apache Taverna Maven Parent 1-incubating
Apache Taverna Language 0.1.0-incubating
The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a
majority of at least three +1 Apache Taverna PPMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just
committers, please feel free to try out the release candidate
and provide your votes.
(Before anyone asks, RC1 was a release candidate tag I dropped as it
used an older Apache super-pom)
--
Stian Soiland-Reyes
Apache Taverna (incubating)
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718