You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/07/31 12:38:49 UTC

[GitHub] [nifi] pvillard31 opened a new pull request #5266: NIFI-8966 - Confluent Schema Registry - get schema without subject/version

pvillard31 opened a new pull request #5266:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5266


   Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
   
   Please provide a short description of the PR here:
   
   #### Description of PR
   
   _Enables X functionality; fixes bug NIFI-YYYY._
   
   In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
   to ensure the following steps have been taken:
   
   ### For all changes:
   - [ ] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
        in the commit message?
   
   - [ ] Does your PR title start with **NIFI-XXXX** where XXXX is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
   
   - [ ] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically `main`)?
   
   - [ ] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit? _Additional commits in response to PR reviewer feedback should be made on this branch and pushed to allow change tracking. Do not `squash` or use `--force` when pushing to allow for clean monitoring of changes._
   
   ### For code changes:
   - [ ] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via `mvn -Pcontrib-check clean install` at the root `nifi` folder?
   - [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
   - [ ] Have you verified that the full build is successful on JDK 8?
   - [ ] Have you verified that the full build is successful on JDK 11?
   - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE` file, including the main `LICENSE` file under `nifi-assembly`?
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `NOTICE` file, including the main `NOTICE` file found under `nifi-assembly`?
   - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added `.displayName` in addition to .name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
   
   ### For documentation related changes:
   - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered?
   
   ### Note:
   Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check GitHub Actions CI for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@nifi.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [nifi] asfgit closed pull request #5266: NIFI-8966 - Confluent Schema Registry - get schema without subject/version

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
asfgit closed pull request #5266:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5266


   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@nifi.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [nifi] pvillard31 commented on pull request #5266: NIFI-8966 - Confluent Schema Registry - get schema without subject/version

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
pvillard31 commented on pull request #5266:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5266#issuecomment-922774368


   I never managed to reproduce the situation where this new method would be used when integrating NiFi with Confluent Cloud. However, when commenting the code for the other methods and forcing the use of this new method, I confirmed this was working as expected. I also worked directly with the reporters/commenters of the JIRA (NIFI-8785) and they confirmed this is solving what they observed on their side.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@nifi.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org