You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@karaf.apache.org by Ryan Moquin <fr...@gmail.com> on 2013/05/25 22:59:52 UTC
ConfigAdmin services
I noticed Karaf has a config admin service, but so does felix. What's the
difference? Is there are reason to use one over the other? Might be a
dumb question, but it seems a little confusing. :)
Re: ConfigAdmin services
Posted by rkmoquin <fr...@gmail.com>.
Thanks JB, it didn't actually look like there was a link and so it made me
wonder. Thanks for clearing up :)
--
View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/ConfigAdmin-services-tp4028830p4028834.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: ConfigAdmin services
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Karaf uses directly Felix ConfigAdmin.
No difference at all. The Karaf etc folder is scanned by Felix
FileInstall (like the deploy folder) and delegated to Felix ConfigAdmin.
We provide commands, MBeans, facilities on top of ConfigAdmin.
Regards
JB
On 05/25/2013 10:59 PM, Ryan Moquin wrote:
> I noticed Karaf has a config admin service, but so does felix. What's
> the difference? Is there are reason to use one over the other? Might
> be a dumb question, but it seems a little confusing. :)
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: ConfigAdmin services
Posted by Andreas Pieber <an...@gmail.com>.
Karaf uses the Felix configuration admn service :-)
On 25 May 2013 23:00, "Ryan Moquin" <fr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed Karaf has a config admin service, but so does felix. What's the
> difference? Is there are reason to use one over the other? Might be a
> dumb question, but it seems a little confusing. :)
>