You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/04/26 10:23:31 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-4401) Document USING clause in joins

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Knut Anders Hatlen resolved DERBY-4401.
---------------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 10.6.0.0
       Resolution: Fixed

Committed revision 937958.

> Document USING clause in joins
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-4401
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4401
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 10.6.0.0
>            Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
>            Assignee: Knut Anders Hatlen
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 10.6.0.0
>
>         Attachments: using.diff, using.zip
>
>
> DERBY-4370 made some of the join operations accept a USING clause. This should be documented in the reference manual.
> The JOIN operations section talks about "join clause", which should be fine since that could mean both ON clause and USING clause.
> The sections INNER JOIN operation, LEFT OUTER JOIN operation and RIGHT OUTER JOIN operation need to be updated with the new syntax. We need to replace
> {
>     ON booleanExpression
> }
> with
> {
>     { ON booleanExpression } |
>     { USING ( Simple-column-Name [ , Simple-column-Name ]* ) }
> }
> Perhaps it would make sense to factor out this part of the syntax into a separate element JoinSpecification, and explain the meaning of USING there.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.