You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@camel.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/03/11 15:30:09 UTC
[GitHub] [camel-k] squakez opened a new issue #2113: OLM installation may fail with default values
squakez opened a new issue #2113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/2113
Installing the default camel-k operator via `kamel install` may not work on minikube or other k8s distribution where OLM is installed outside openshift (ie https://olm.operatorframework.io/docs/getting-started/#install-released-olm). It produces the following error:
```
message: targeted catalogsource openshift-marketplace/community-operators missing
```
To workaround it you can override the default `catalogsource` with `kamel install --olm-source-namespace=olm --olm-source=operatorhubio-catalog`.
However I think it could be convenient to change the default values to the ones expected by the default OLM installation in order to be consistent.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [camel-k] squakez closed issue #2113: OLM installation may fail with default values
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
squakez closed issue #2113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/2113
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@camel.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [camel-k] github-actions[bot] commented on issue #2113: OLM installation may fail with default values
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #2113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/2113#issuecomment-962527642
This issue has been automatically marked as stale due to 90 days of inactivity.
It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 15 days.
If you think that’s incorrect or the issue should never stale, please simply write any comment.
Thanks for your contributions!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@camel.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [camel-k] astefanutti commented on issue #2113: OLM installation may fail with default values
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
astefanutti commented on issue #2113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/2113#issuecomment-813943198
Sounds good to me 👍🏼.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [camel-k] squakez commented on issue #2113: OLM installation may fail with default values
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
squakez commented on issue #2113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/2113#issuecomment-810897034
The fix for this issue would be the following one: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/compare/master...squakez:fix/2113_olm_default
However I am not sure if we introduce any problem when dealing with Openshift operators and the like. @astefanutti, @nicolaferraro should I proceed or do you think this may trigger other problems?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [camel-k] squakez commented on issue #2113: OLM installation may fail with default values
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
squakez commented on issue #2113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/2113#issuecomment-810238972
They seems to be also the values used from operatorHub.io procedure: https://operatorhub.io/install/camel-k.yaml
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [camel-k] squakez commented on issue #2113: OLM installation may fail with default values
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
squakez commented on issue #2113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/2113#issuecomment-813252873
I imagined that. I think the best experience would be to have dynamic values based on our capability to discover what kind of OLM is installed in the cluster. I will have a look and we can keep this open in the while.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [camel-k] astefanutti commented on issue #2113: OLM installation may fail with default values
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
astefanutti commented on issue #2113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/2113#issuecomment-811695328
@squakez yes the current default values match the community catalog that comes in OpenShift 4. Changing these would break people using the upstream CLI version with OpenShift 4.
Another option would be to have _dynamic_ default values, as the `kamel install` command is capable of detecting the environment it's installing onto.
If we were to keep _static_ default values, then we would have to assess what is the dominant usage to make a decision. I haven't seen any evidence that OLM on Kubernetes is taking off? Are there any major Kubernetes distribution, aside OpenShift, that comes with OLM OOTB? I'd be inclined to think the dominant OLM use case is on OpenShift, and that the upstream CLI install command should default to the community catalog, which is the case.
For the product catalog in OpenShift 4, these variables are set as Go build-time variables in downstream builds, whose CLI binaries can be downloaded from the OpenShift Web console, which is the dominant use case for product versions.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [camel-k] squakez commented on issue #2113: OLM installation may fail with default values
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
squakez commented on issue #2113:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/2113#issuecomment-796820518
cc @astefanutti
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org