You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@age.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/08/19 09:01:56 UTC
[GitHub] [age-website] shinhanbyeol opened a new issue, #52: [Discussion] Please give us your opinion on the reform of the age website
shinhanbyeol opened a new issue, #52:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/issues/52
hello ~ @apache/age-committers
We are preparing to reorganize the age website to recruit commiter and encourage open source participation Please check the new-web branch and give us your opinion.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@age.apache.org.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [age-website] shinhanbyeol commented on issue #52: [Discussion] Please give us your opinion on the reform of the age website
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
shinhanbyeol commented on issue #52:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/issues/52#issuecomment-1237664539
https://age.apache.org/
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@age.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [age-website] shinhanbyeol commented on issue #52: [Discussion] Please give us your opinion on the reform of the age website
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
shinhanbyeol commented on issue #52:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/issues/52#issuecomment-1221656823
> Nice job! The new website looks a lot more inviting.
>
> General remarks / questions:
>
> * For issues, Jira is mentioned, while in practice, I think currently most new issues by new members of the community are created in Github. Should Github be mentioned instead of Jira? Should one of the 2 issue trackers be closed in favor of the other?
> * For the code review process, currently a review process using e-mail and patches is described (https://github.com/apache/age-website/blob/new-web/src/pages/contribution/guide.md#code-review-process). Wouldn't it be easier to use Github Pull Requests instead of patches in e-mails?
> * Will the documentation pages be generated using Gatsby as well? (currently, the documentation link links to a non-existing page). I think a link to the documentation in the footer could be practical as well.
> * Some icons / elements are quite big, but of course that is a personal preference.
>
> I've encountered some typos and missing links as well, but I think it's best to address those in a PR once the general discussion has concluded.
“Apache AGE Manual” items in the documentation menu will utilize the same resources as https://age.apache.org/docs/master/index.html
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@age.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [age-website] JoshInnis commented on issue #52: [Discussion] Please give us your opinion on the reform of the age website
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
JoshInnis commented on issue #52:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/issues/52#issuecomment-1224877430
The documentation on the old site has this feature where users can view a specific released version of the documentation. The new website only contains one version, from master. I would recommend we keep that feature.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@age.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [age-website] shinhanbyeol commented on issue #52: [Discussion] Please give us your opinion on the reform of the age website
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
shinhanbyeol commented on issue #52:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/issues/52#issuecomment-1223780772
Thanks to everyone's attention and help,
We have opened https://age.staged.apache.org
Future changes can be found here at https://age.staged.apache.org
I'd like to open a new website at age.apache.org when it's ready
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@age.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [age-website] pdpotter commented on issue #52: [Discussion] Please give us your opinion on the reform of the age website
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
pdpotter commented on issue #52:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/issues/52#issuecomment-1225434750
I just realized the documentation will be in another location on the new site (`age-manual` instead of `docs`). Do we want to change the location, potentially breaking links from external sites and issues?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@age.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [age-website] JoshInnis commented on issue #52: [Discussion] Please give us your opinion on the reform of the age website
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
JoshInnis commented on issue #52:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/issues/52#issuecomment-1220872538
Hello,
I agree with @pdpotter, on the general site and I agree with many of the point mentioned. i also noticed the age manual part of the site did not build with the instructions given
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@age.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [age-website] pdpotter commented on issue #52: [Discussion] Please give us your opinion on the reform of the age website
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
pdpotter commented on issue #52:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/issues/52#issuecomment-1225441810
Will the new website be build manually each time, or will a GitHub workflow be added to automate this process?
I'm going to have to make some changes to the documentation build config, as `new-web` and `documentation-staging` are incorrectly seen as documentation release branches.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@age.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [age-website] manjung49 commented on issue #52: [Discussion] Please give us your opinion on the reform of the age website
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
manjung49 commented on issue #52:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/issues/52#issuecomment-1221660399
> * For issues, Jira is mentioned, while in practice, I think currently most new issues by new members of the community are created in Github. Should Github be mentioned instead of Jira? Should one of the 2 issue trackers be closed in favor of the other? --- This section has been edited. We're going to encourage the users to use Github, Stackoverflow, and Reddit to share ideas, knowledge, and any issues. Thanks :)
> Nice job! The new website looks a lot more inviting.
>
> General remarks / questions:
>
> * For issues, Jira is mentioned, while in practice, I think currently most new issues by new members of the community are created in Github. Should Github be mentioned instead of Jira? Should one of the 2 issue trackers be closed in favor of the other?
> * For the code review process, currently a review process using e-mail and patches is described (https://github.com/apache/age-website/blob/new-web/src/pages/contribution/guide.md#code-review-process). Wouldn't it be easier to use Github Pull Requests instead of patches in e-mails?
> * Will the documentation pages be generated using Gatsby as well? (currently, the documentation link links to a non-existing page). I think a link to the documentation in the footer could be practical as well.
> * Some icons / elements are quite big, but of course that is a personal preference.
>
> I've encountered some typos and missing links as well, but I think it's best to address those in a PR once the general discussion has concluded.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@age.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [age-website] shinhanbyeol closed issue #52: [Discussion] Please give us your opinion on the reform of the age website
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
shinhanbyeol closed issue #52: [Discussion] Please give us your opinion on the reform of the age website
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/issues/52
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@age.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [age-website] pdpotter commented on issue #52: [Discussion] Please give us your opinion on the reform of the age website
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
pdpotter commented on issue #52:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/issues/52#issuecomment-1220518436
Nice job! The new website looks a lot more inviting.
General remarks / questions:
* For issues, Jira is mentioned, while in practice, I think currently most new issues by new members of the community are created in Github. Should Github be mentioned instead of Jira? Should one of the 2 issue trackers be closed in favor of the other?
* For the code review process, currently a review process using e-mail and patches is described (https://github.com/apache/age-website/blob/new-web/src/pages/contribution/guide.md#code-review-process). Wouldn't it be easier to use Github Pull Requests instead of patches in e-mails?
* Will the documentation pages be generated using Gatsby as well? (currently, the documentation link links to a non-existing page). I think a link to the documentation in the footer could be practical as well.
* Some icons / elements are quite big, but of course that is a personal preference.
I've encountered some typos and missing links as well, but I think it's best to address those in a PR once the general discussion has concluded.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@age.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org