You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com> on 2006/02/14 08:35:33 UTC
Ode Proposal
Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
Please feel free to comment.
Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase developers that
wish to work on this project? Can you get the Software Grant paperwork
faxed in?
Any other ASF committers want to jump in?
We need some more mentors. Anyone?
This is not meant to stop discussions about this donation, just to start
the bureaucratic machinery while they take place.
Regards,
Alan
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 15 Feb 2006, at 16:31, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 15:56 +0000, James Strachan wrote:
>> Dims & Sanjiva
>>
>> Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
>> podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
>> join us in the ODE proposal then we can have a united Apache
>> community with folks from Agila, Geronimo, ServiceMix, & WS involved
>> to insure plenty of cross pollination.
>
> Wow I feel "special" to get asked liked this ;-).
>
> I was going to ask to join anyway .. so I'll be happy to.
Great! :)
> However, I
> would like to request some changes:
>
> - Under warning signs, in the "Homogenous developers" category it
> lists
> developers from Sybase, IBM & LogicBlaze. Is it the case that the
> *current* codebase has contribs from all these companies? If not I
> believe the spirit of the question is about the current codebase, not
> about the group that'll get it thru incubation. So please indicate who
> wrote the current codebase (which I believe is all Synbase).
Good point - fixed.
> - The initial committers list is very long. I'm on service-mix dev
> and I
> see only 2-3 people committing
Have you tried looking at the SVN logs? The codebase has only been in
the incubator for 2 months and 12 folks have been hacking the code
furiously (and we're still waiting for karma for a couple more
committers).
> (and little or no discussion; am I
> missing some stuff??).
Maybe you're email filters are hiding email? There's a fair amount of
discussion...
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-servicemix-dev/
200602.mbox/thread
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-servicemix-dev/
200601.mbox/thread
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-servicemix-dev/
200512.mbox/thread
There's plenty of background chatter on IRC too if you need more chat
(though important decisions and votes always take place via email)
> Can we try to list people who are really going to
> write code for this? It doesn't make sense to list *23* committers
> unless they will really write code.
They will.
> We can always bring people on board
> as they start contributing. If all these people are really so hot to
> mess with a BPEL impl, damn, I should feel really good about BPEL ;-).
You should as they are. The people listed who are servicemix
committers have committed substantial code already to ServiceMix and
are keen to work on the integration of BPEL + ServiceMix along with
enhancing the core BPEL engine (such as the management & persistence
piece). The Sybase folks wrote the original code and the Agila
committer is the guy who wrote all the BPEL code in Agila - so far
I'm happy with the committer list.
> - Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about
> this
> project, how about if we get the Incubator PMC to sponsor this
> poddling?
Why does the sponsor PMC make any difference to whether the BPEL
engine goes top level or not? e.g. Tuscany is sponsored by WS and is
gonna be a TLP?
Given the Geronimo PMC did vote to accept the patch into ServiceMix
(though given the general sentiment to use a separate podling we've
backed off), we'd rather stick to the same sponsor PMC for the moment.
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 15 Feb 2006, at 16:31, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 15:56 +0000, James Strachan wrote:
>> Dims & Sanjiva
>>
>> Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
>> podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
>> join us in the ODE proposal then we can have a united Apache
>> community with folks from Agila, Geronimo, ServiceMix, & WS involved
>> to insure plenty of cross pollination.
>
> Wow I feel "special" to get asked liked this ;-).
>
> I was going to ask to join anyway .. so I'll be happy to.
Great! :)
> However, I
> would like to request some changes:
>
> - Under warning signs, in the "Homogenous developers" category it
> lists
> developers from Sybase, IBM & LogicBlaze. Is it the case that the
> *current* codebase has contribs from all these companies? If not I
> believe the spirit of the question is about the current codebase, not
> about the group that'll get it thru incubation. So please indicate who
> wrote the current codebase (which I believe is all Synbase).
Good point - fixed.
> - The initial committers list is very long. I'm on service-mix dev
> and I
> see only 2-3 people committing
Have you tried looking at the SVN logs? The codebase has only been in
the incubator for 2 months and 12 folks have been hacking the code
furiously (and we're still waiting for karma for a couple more
committers).
> (and little or no discussion; am I
> missing some stuff??).
Maybe you're email filters are hiding email? There's a fair amount of
discussion...
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-servicemix-dev/
200602.mbox/thread
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-servicemix-dev/
200601.mbox/thread
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-servicemix-dev/
200512.mbox/thread
There's plenty of background chatter on IRC too if you need more chat
(though important decisions and votes always take place via email)
> Can we try to list people who are really going to
> write code for this? It doesn't make sense to list *23* committers
> unless they will really write code.
They will.
> We can always bring people on board
> as they start contributing. If all these people are really so hot to
> mess with a BPEL impl, damn, I should feel really good about BPEL ;-).
You should as they are. The people listed who are servicemix
committers have committed substantial code already to ServiceMix and
are keen to work on the integration of BPEL + ServiceMix along with
enhancing the core BPEL engine (such as the management & persistence
piece). The Sybase folks wrote the original code and the Agila
committer is the guy who wrote all the BPEL code in Agila - so far
I'm happy with the committer list.
> - Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about
> this
> project, how about if we get the Incubator PMC to sponsor this
> poddling?
Why does the sponsor PMC make any difference to whether the BPEL
engine goes top level or not? e.g. Tuscany is sponsored by WS and is
gonna be a TLP?
Given the Geronimo PMC did vote to accept the patch into ServiceMix
(though given the general sentiment to use a separate podling we've
backed off), we'd rather stick to the same sponsor PMC for the moment.
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 15 Feb 2006, at 16:31, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 15:56 +0000, James Strachan wrote:
>> Dims & Sanjiva
>>
>> Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
>> podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
>> join us in the ODE proposal then we can have a united Apache
>> community with folks from Agila, Geronimo, ServiceMix, & WS involved
>> to insure plenty of cross pollination.
>
> Wow I feel "special" to get asked liked this ;-).
>
> I was going to ask to join anyway .. so I'll be happy to.
Great! :)
> However, I
> would like to request some changes:
>
> - Under warning signs, in the "Homogenous developers" category it
> lists
> developers from Sybase, IBM & LogicBlaze. Is it the case that the
> *current* codebase has contribs from all these companies? If not I
> believe the spirit of the question is about the current codebase, not
> about the group that'll get it thru incubation. So please indicate who
> wrote the current codebase (which I believe is all Synbase).
Good point - fixed.
> - The initial committers list is very long. I'm on service-mix dev
> and I
> see only 2-3 people committing
Have you tried looking at the SVN logs? The codebase has only been in
the incubator for 2 months and 12 folks have been hacking the code
furiously (and we're still waiting for karma for a couple more
committers).
> (and little or no discussion; am I
> missing some stuff??).
Maybe you're email filters are hiding email? There's a fair amount of
discussion...
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-servicemix-dev/
200602.mbox/thread
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-servicemix-dev/
200601.mbox/thread
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-servicemix-dev/
200512.mbox/thread
There's plenty of background chatter on IRC too if you need more chat
(though important decisions and votes always take place via email)
> Can we try to list people who are really going to
> write code for this? It doesn't make sense to list *23* committers
> unless they will really write code.
They will.
> We can always bring people on board
> as they start contributing. If all these people are really so hot to
> mess with a BPEL impl, damn, I should feel really good about BPEL ;-).
You should as they are. The people listed who are servicemix
committers have committed substantial code already to ServiceMix and
are keen to work on the integration of BPEL + ServiceMix along with
enhancing the core BPEL engine (such as the management & persistence
piece). The Sybase folks wrote the original code and the Agila
committer is the guy who wrote all the BPEL code in Agila - so far
I'm happy with the committer list.
> - Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about
> this
> project, how about if we get the Incubator PMC to sponsor this
> poddling?
Why does the sponsor PMC make any difference to whether the BPEL
engine goes top level or not? e.g. Tuscany is sponsored by WS and is
gonna be a TLP?
Given the Geronimo PMC did vote to accept the patch into ServiceMix
(though given the general sentiment to use a separate podling we've
backed off), we'd rather stick to the same sponsor PMC for the moment.
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On 2/15/06, Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org> wrote:
> A number of folks here in the Incubator believe it is best to
> establish a community with no prior ties, and have repeated that on a
> number of occasions (including Sanjiva's and Noel's comments today).
> The general belief is that this will create a better community around
> the ASF's BPEL work.
Greg, I'm trying to understand the statements above. The more I read
them the more it seems that the Incubator PMC can decide what's best
for a proposal at any given time including making decisions about the
oversight. Are there documents about this topic on the Incubator site
that I've missed? I truly want to understand this and I'd appreciate
any further explanation or identification of any documents that
clarifies this issue.
> Part of the problem that I'm seeing is you use of "we" in your
> message. Who is "we"? And that leads to, who is "not we"? Why is there
> a partition? I believe this is one of the primary issues that is being
> dealt with right now, Dain. You are dividing BPEL workers into a "we"
> and "others" camp.
>
> Or, let's just say that was a random term to refer to the Geronimo
> project and you're not really seeing two groups. i.e. not fair of me
> to assign that way of thinking to you. Okay. So moving on: why is it
> important for this to be Geronimo sponsored? Why? Seriously. WTF does
> it matter?
>
> We've already said the IP clearance paperwork is the same no matter
> what. Great. Get that done and start working. When BPEL is ready to
> graduate, then we look at where it goes. Quite possibly Geronimo. But
> what does it matter that Geronimo is the sponsor? Why are you so keyed
> in on that?
>
> I can clearly see benefits with "absence of ties". I don't see the
> benefit of Geronimo sponsoring that you're seeing. And without that
> understanding, then I get to make up crazy reasons :-P
And the statements above aren't helping me understand this any
further. Can you help clarify this for me please?
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache Geronimo (http://geronimo.apache.org/)
Castor (http://castor.org/)
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
I guess I was just reacting to the complete dismissal by Noel. In
the middle of a vote on the Geronimo PMC, we get a message that
effectively the Incubator has stepped in and has take over this
proposal. Now, stop and wait before responding to that statement and
let me explain. The normal process, as I understand it, for a new
podling is a proposal is posted to a some dev list saying, "I'd like
to start a project in the incubator to create X, are you willing to
sponsor it?" The PMC evaluates it and votes. This normal process
was interrupted by Noel simply stating that the Incubator has decided
to sponsor it. There was no public discussion and this proposal was
never even presented to the Incubator PMC for sponsorship. I have
never seen this happen before and it came with a very dismissive note
(my reading).
I find it very frustrating that in my mind the policies and
procedures in the incubator keep changing. When I point this out I
get accused of various things such as "protecting turf". Greg, I can
understand why you see it that way, but I am simply trying to follow
policy, precedent and the Apache Way. Anyway, no need to respond,
I'm just frustrated.
I'm going to try to stay out of the rest of this discussion, but
before I go, I suggest that ALL of you go back to your open source
roots and reexamine this whole situation. There are a very few
people in this discussion that actually want to work on a BPEL engine
or integrate it into a project. If your not one of them, take a step
back and let the community decide how they want to handle the code.
If the want to work together, we should support them. If the don't
want to work together and decide to fork it into three competing
projects, we should support them. If they want to hard code in
dependencies on any technology, we should support them. If they want
to rewrite it in COBOL, we should support them. They are the
community and we should support them.
-dain
/me crawls back under his flame proof rock
On Feb 15, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> [trimmed individuals and pmc's from the cc: list]
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 03:22:23PM -0800, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>> On Feb 15, 2006, at 3:09 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>> Sanjiva,
>>>
>>>> - Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about
>>>> this project, how about if we get the Incubator PMC to sponsor this
>>>> poddling?
>>>
>>> Agreed. That is what I said to the Geronimo PMC, as well. The
>>> Incubator PMC will sponsor the project.
>> ...
>> I know it doesn't mean much, but I personally would like to see this
>> as a Geronimo sponsored project. We are the ones that have taken the
>> licks over this for the past 2 weeks and would really like to work to
>> carry this through the full process.
>>
>> So to flip things around on you...
>>
>> There is no need for the Incubator PMC to sponsor. The Geronimo
>> PMC will sponsor the project.
>>
>> Thanks for your understanding.
>
> A number of folks here in the Incubator believe it is best to
> establish a community with no prior ties, and have repeated that on a
> number of occasions (including Sanjiva's and Noel's comments today).
> The general belief is that this will create a better community around
> the ASF's BPEL work.
>
> Part of the problem that I'm seeing is you use of "we" in your
> message. Who is "we"? And that leads to, who is "not we"? Why is there
> a partition? I believe this is one of the primary issues that is being
> dealt with right now, Dain. You are dividing BPEL workers into a "we"
> and "others" camp.
>
> Or, let's just say that was a random term to refer to the Geronimo
> project and you're not really seeing two groups. i.e. not fair of me
> to assign that way of thinking to you. Okay. So moving on: why is it
> important for this to be Geronimo sponsored? Why? Seriously. WTF does
> it matter?
>
> We've already said the IP clearance paperwork is the same no matter
> what. Great. Get that done and start working. When BPEL is ready to
> graduate, then we look at where it goes. Quite possibly Geronimo. But
> what does it matter that Geronimo is the sponsor? Why are you so keyed
> in on that?
>
> I can clearly see benefits with "absence of ties". I don't see the
> benefit of Geronimo sponsoring that you're seeing. And without that
> understanding, then I get to make up crazy reasons :-P
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>
> --
> Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org>.
[trimmed individuals and pmc's from the cc: list]
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 03:22:23PM -0800, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2006, at 3:09 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> >Sanjiva,
> >
> >>- Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about
> >>this project, how about if we get the Incubator PMC to sponsor this
> >>poddling?
> >
> >Agreed. That is what I said to the Geronimo PMC, as well. The
> >Incubator PMC will sponsor the project.
>...
> I know it doesn't mean much, but I personally would like to see this
> as a Geronimo sponsored project. We are the ones that have taken the
> licks over this for the past 2 weeks and would really like to work to
> carry this through the full process.
>
> So to flip things around on you...
>
> There is no need for the Incubator PMC to sponsor. The Geronimo
> PMC will sponsor the project.
>
> Thanks for your understanding.
A number of folks here in the Incubator believe it is best to
establish a community with no prior ties, and have repeated that on a
number of occasions (including Sanjiva's and Noel's comments today).
The general belief is that this will create a better community around
the ASF's BPEL work.
Part of the problem that I'm seeing is you use of "we" in your
message. Who is "we"? And that leads to, who is "not we"? Why is there
a partition? I believe this is one of the primary issues that is being
dealt with right now, Dain. You are dividing BPEL workers into a "we"
and "others" camp.
Or, let's just say that was a random term to refer to the Geronimo
project and you're not really seeing two groups. i.e. not fair of me
to assign that way of thinking to you. Okay. So moving on: why is it
important for this to be Geronimo sponsored? Why? Seriously. WTF does
it matter?
We've already said the IP clearance paperwork is the same no matter
what. Great. Get that done and start working. When BPEL is ready to
graduate, then we look at where it goes. Quite possibly Geronimo. But
what does it matter that Geronimo is the sponsor? Why are you so keyed
in on that?
I can clearly see benefits with "absence of ties". I don't see the
benefit of Geronimo sponsoring that you're seeing. And without that
understanding, then I get to make up crazy reasons :-P
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org>.
[trimmed individuals and pmc's from the cc: list]
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 03:22:23PM -0800, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2006, at 3:09 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> >Sanjiva,
> >
> >>- Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about
> >>this project, how about if we get the Incubator PMC to sponsor this
> >>poddling?
> >
> >Agreed. That is what I said to the Geronimo PMC, as well. The
> >Incubator PMC will sponsor the project.
>...
> I know it doesn't mean much, but I personally would like to see this
> as a Geronimo sponsored project. We are the ones that have taken the
> licks over this for the past 2 weeks and would really like to work to
> carry this through the full process.
>
> So to flip things around on you...
>
> There is no need for the Incubator PMC to sponsor. The Geronimo
> PMC will sponsor the project.
>
> Thanks for your understanding.
A number of folks here in the Incubator believe it is best to
establish a community with no prior ties, and have repeated that on a
number of occasions (including Sanjiva's and Noel's comments today).
The general belief is that this will create a better community around
the ASF's BPEL work.
Part of the problem that I'm seeing is you use of "we" in your
message. Who is "we"? And that leads to, who is "not we"? Why is there
a partition? I believe this is one of the primary issues that is being
dealt with right now, Dain. You are dividing BPEL workers into a "we"
and "others" camp.
Or, let's just say that was a random term to refer to the Geronimo
project and you're not really seeing two groups. i.e. not fair of me
to assign that way of thinking to you. Okay. So moving on: why is it
important for this to be Geronimo sponsored? Why? Seriously. WTF does
it matter?
We've already said the IP clearance paperwork is the same no matter
what. Great. Get that done and start working. When BPEL is ready to
graduate, then we look at where it goes. Quite possibly Geronimo. But
what does it matter that Geronimo is the sponsor? Why are you so keyed
in on that?
I can clearly see benefits with "absence of ties". I don't see the
benefit of Geronimo sponsoring that you're seeing. And without that
understanding, then I get to make up crazy reasons :-P
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
Makes since. Thanks for spending the time to explain this to me.
This really helps.
Thanks,
-dain
On Feb 15, 2006, at 6:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Dain,
>
>> Since you brought this public, I'll post my response along with you
>> original email. I hope you don't mind...
>
> I don't, but you might have also included my reply. :-)
>
>> There is no need for the Incubator PMC to sponsor. The Geronimo
>> PMC will sponsor the project.
>
> As I had replied to you there, a need has been clearly indicated by
> sentiments expressed by people on the Incubator list. That has been
> reiterated today.
>
> The Incubator must foster collaborative development. In this case
> that
> means providing what will be perceived as a neutral playing ground,
> where no
> one feels disadvantaged. No one should ever feel disadvantaged in
> an ASF
> project. The fact that Geronimo's involvement is driving much of the
> contention is as disturbing to me as to you, and is important to
> resolve,
> but is also outside the scope of this discussion.
>
> It is entirely unfair to Sybase and the other contributors to pitch
> them
> into the middle of whatever ancillary issues need resolving, and so
> that's
> going to end now by the simple expedient of having the project
> sponsored by
> the Incubator.
>
> Although I would vastly prefer a single collaborating community, we
> could
> create seperate projects for Ode and PXE. However, Bill Flood just
> made it
> quite clear to me that he would prefer to have a single project
> combining
> the best of each contributions, and that appears to be Intalio's
> preference
> as well, so that's what we'll do, and see where it goes.
>
> --- Noel
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
Dain,
> Since you brought this public, I'll post my response along with you
> original email. I hope you don't mind...
I don't, but you might have also included my reply. :-)
> There is no need for the Incubator PMC to sponsor. The Geronimo
> PMC will sponsor the project.
As I had replied to you there, a need has been clearly indicated by
sentiments expressed by people on the Incubator list. That has been
reiterated today.
The Incubator must foster collaborative development. In this case that
means providing what will be perceived as a neutral playing ground, where no
one feels disadvantaged. No one should ever feel disadvantaged in an ASF
project. The fact that Geronimo's involvement is driving much of the
contention is as disturbing to me as to you, and is important to resolve,
but is also outside the scope of this discussion.
It is entirely unfair to Sybase and the other contributors to pitch them
into the middle of whatever ancillary issues need resolving, and so that's
going to end now by the simple expedient of having the project sponsored by
the Incubator.
Although I would vastly prefer a single collaborating community, we could
create seperate projects for Ode and PXE. However, Bill Flood just made it
quite clear to me that he would prefer to have a single project combining
the best of each contributions, and that appears to be Intalio's preference
as well, so that's what we'll do, and see where it goes.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
On Feb 15, 2006, at 3:09 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Sanjiva,
>
>> - Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about
>> this
>> project, how about if we get the Incubator PMC to sponsor this
>> poddling?
>
> Agreed. That is what I said to the Geronimo PMC, as well. The
> Incubator
> PMC will sponsor the project.
Since you brought this public, I'll post my response along with you
original email. I hope you don't mind...
On Feb 15, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> No need for this vote. The Incubator PMC will sponsor the project.
>
> --- Noel
I know it doesn't mean much, but I personally would like to see this
as a Geronimo sponsored project. We are the ones that have taken the
licks over this for the past 2 weeks and would really like to work to
carry this through the full process.
So to flip things around on you...
There is no need for the Incubator PMC to sponsor. The Geronimo
PMC will sponsor the project.
Thanks for your understanding.
-dain
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
On Feb 15, 2006, at 3:09 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Sanjiva,
>
>> - Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about
>> this
>> project, how about if we get the Incubator PMC to sponsor this
>> poddling?
>
> Agreed. That is what I said to the Geronimo PMC, as well. The
> Incubator
> PMC will sponsor the project.
Since you brought this public, I'll post my response along with you
original email. I hope you don't mind...
On Feb 15, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> No need for this vote. The Incubator PMC will sponsor the project.
>
> --- Noel
I know it doesn't mean much, but I personally would like to see this
as a Geronimo sponsored project. We are the ones that have taken the
licks over this for the past 2 weeks and would really like to work to
carry this through the full process.
So to flip things around on you...
There is no need for the Incubator PMC to sponsor. The Geronimo
PMC will sponsor the project.
Thanks for your understanding.
-dain
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
Sanjiva,
> - Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about this
> project, how about if we get the Incubator PMC to sponsor this poddling?
Agreed. That is what I said to the Geronimo PMC, as well. The Incubator
PMC will sponsor the project.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
Sanjiva,
> - Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about this
> project, how about if we get the Incubator PMC to sponsor this poddling?
Agreed. That is what I said to the Geronimo PMC, as well. The Incubator
PMC will sponsor the project.
--- Noel
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 15:56 +0000, James Strachan wrote:
> Dims & Sanjiva
>
> Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
> podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
> join us in the ODE proposal then we can have a united Apache
> community with folks from Agila, Geronimo, ServiceMix, & WS involved
> to insure plenty of cross pollination.
Wow I feel "special" to get asked liked this ;-).
I was going to ask to join anyway .. so I'll be happy to. However, I
would like to request some changes:
- Under warning signs, in the "Homogenous developers" category it lists
developers from Sybase, IBM & LogicBlaze. Is it the case that the
*current* codebase has contribs from all these companies? If not I
believe the spirit of the question is about the current codebase, not
about the group that'll get it thru incubation. So please indicate who
wrote the current codebase (which I believe is all Synbase).
- The initial committers list is very long. I'm on service-mix dev and I
see only 2-3 people committing (and little or no discussion; am I
missing some stuff??). Can we try to list people who are really going to
write code for this? It doesn't make sense to list *23* committers
unless they will really write code. We can always bring people on board
as they start contributing. If all these people are really so hot to
mess with a BPEL impl, damn, I should feel really good about BPEL ;-).
- Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about this
project, how about if we get the Incubator PMC to sponsor this poddling?
I'm a member of that PMC and I'll be happy to do it. That allows the
poddling to decide, upon graduation, its final resting place: Geronimo,
new TLP or elsewhere. (NO, I'm not even suggesting it go to WS .. as I
said earlier, WS is too damned crowded already.) I see *nothing* to be
gained by saying its going to be part of Geronimo at this point; so you
see my bias already: go for its own TLP. However, if that appears to be
the right thing upon graduation, then so be it.
Note that this does not preclude ServiceMix, or *anyone else* from
embracing and extending Apache Ode and living happily ever after. In
fact, its *much better* for Apache Ode to be on its own because then its
likely to be pluggable to more container frameworks and not just
Geronimo/ServiceMix.
Bye,
Sanjiva.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 15 Feb 2006, at 16:54, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> James,
>
> Thanks for taking the first step. Yes, please add me in as a mentor.
> Here's some feedback first about the proposal before we take the next
> step.
>
> - AFAIK, Geronimo PMC has not voted on this proposal.
We kinda voted already on G-PMC but the new proposal changes things
slightly (being a new podling) so to clear things up I've called
another vote.
> - Can we please put out a call to other Open source BPEL engines to
> join us with their contributions? (ala, Synapse).
Sure, we're open to other contributions and contributors from
wherever; they can arrive at any time - lets starting incubating
> - Can we please add people in a phased manner as committers? based on
> their patches/energy on the list? (ala, Harmony)
All the folks on the committer list are folks who've expressed
interest in working on the code. The only non-apache committers so
far are the Sybase folks who've written all the code being
contributed; the rest are already proven committers in Agila,
Geronimo or ServiceMix
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 15 Feb 2006, at 16:54, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> James,
>
> Thanks for taking the first step. Yes, please add me in as a mentor.
> Here's some feedback first about the proposal before we take the next
> step.
>
> - AFAIK, Geronimo PMC has not voted on this proposal.
We kinda voted already on G-PMC but the new proposal changes things
slightly (being a new podling) so to clear things up I've called
another vote.
> - Can we please put out a call to other Open source BPEL engines to
> join us with their contributions? (ala, Synapse).
Sure, we're open to other contributions and contributors from
wherever; they can arrive at any time - lets starting incubating
> - Can we please add people in a phased manner as committers? based on
> their patches/energy on the list? (ala, Harmony)
All the folks on the committer list are folks who've expressed
interest in working on the code. The only non-apache committers so
far are the Sybase folks who've written all the code being
contributed; the rest are already proven committers in Agila,
Geronimo or ServiceMix
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 15 Feb 2006, at 16:54, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> James,
>
> Thanks for taking the first step. Yes, please add me in as a mentor.
> Here's some feedback first about the proposal before we take the next
> step.
>
> - AFAIK, Geronimo PMC has not voted on this proposal.
We kinda voted already on G-PMC but the new proposal changes things
slightly (being a new podling) so to clear things up I've called
another vote.
> - Can we please put out a call to other Open source BPEL engines to
> join us with their contributions? (ala, Synapse).
Sure, we're open to other contributions and contributors from
wherever; they can arrive at any time - lets starting incubating
> - Can we please add people in a phased manner as committers? based on
> their patches/energy on the list? (ala, Harmony)
All the folks on the committer list are folks who've expressed
interest in working on the code. The only non-apache committers so
far are the Sybase folks who've written all the code being
contributed; the rest are already proven committers in Agila,
Geronimo or ServiceMix
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
James,
Thanks for taking the first step. Yes, please add me in as a mentor.
Here's some feedback first about the proposal before we take the next
step.
- AFAIK, Geronimo PMC has not voted on this proposal. So can we please
get Incubator PMC to sponsor this?
- Can we please put out a call to other Open source BPEL engines to
join us with their contributions? (ala, Synapse).
- Can we please add people in a phased manner as committers? based on
their patches/energy on the list? (ala, Harmony)
Thanks,
dims
On 2/15/06, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dims & Sanjiva
>
> Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
> podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
> join us in the ODE proposal then we can have a united Apache
> community with folks from Agila, Geronimo, ServiceMix, & WS involved
> to insure plenty of cross pollination.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposa
>
> James
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> > Date: 14 February 2006 07:35:33 GMT
> > To: dev@geronimo.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org,
> > servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> > Subject: Ode Proposal
> > Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
> >
> > Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
> > OdeProposal. Please feel free to comment.
> >
> > We need some more mentors. Anyone?
>
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 15:56 +0000, James Strachan wrote:
> Dims & Sanjiva
>
> Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
> podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
> join us in the ODE proposal then we can have a united Apache
> community with folks from Agila, Geronimo, ServiceMix, & WS involved
> to insure plenty of cross pollination.
Wow I feel "special" to get asked liked this ;-).
I was going to ask to join anyway .. so I'll be happy to. However, I
would like to request some changes:
- Under warning signs, in the "Homogenous developers" category it lists
developers from Sybase, IBM & LogicBlaze. Is it the case that the
*current* codebase has contribs from all these companies? If not I
believe the spirit of the question is about the current codebase, not
about the group that'll get it thru incubation. So please indicate who
wrote the current codebase (which I believe is all Synbase).
- The initial committers list is very long. I'm on service-mix dev and I
see only 2-3 people committing (and little or no discussion; am I
missing some stuff??). Can we try to list people who are really going to
write code for this? It doesn't make sense to list *23* committers
unless they will really write code. We can always bring people on board
as they start contributing. If all these people are really so hot to
mess with a BPEL impl, damn, I should feel really good about BPEL ;-).
- Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about this
project, how about if we get the Incubator PMC to sponsor this poddling?
I'm a member of that PMC and I'll be happy to do it. That allows the
poddling to decide, upon graduation, its final resting place: Geronimo,
new TLP or elsewhere. (NO, I'm not even suggesting it go to WS .. as I
said earlier, WS is too damned crowded already.) I see *nothing* to be
gained by saying its going to be part of Geronimo at this point; so you
see my bias already: go for its own TLP. However, if that appears to be
the right thing upon graduation, then so be it.
Note that this does not preclude ServiceMix, or *anyone else* from
embracing and extending Apache Ode and living happily ever after. In
fact, its *much better* for Apache Ode to be on its own because then its
likely to be pluggable to more container frameworks and not just
Geronimo/ServiceMix.
Bye,
Sanjiva.
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
James,
Thanks for taking the first step. Yes, please add me in as a mentor.
Here's some feedback first about the proposal before we take the next
step.
- AFAIK, Geronimo PMC has not voted on this proposal. So can we please
get Incubator PMC to sponsor this?
- Can we please put out a call to other Open source BPEL engines to
join us with their contributions? (ala, Synapse).
- Can we please add people in a phased manner as committers? based on
their patches/energy on the list? (ala, Harmony)
Thanks,
dims
On 2/15/06, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dims & Sanjiva
>
> Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
> podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
> join us in the ODE proposal then we can have a united Apache
> community with folks from Agila, Geronimo, ServiceMix, & WS involved
> to insure plenty of cross pollination.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposa
>
> James
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> > Date: 14 February 2006 07:35:33 GMT
> > To: dev@geronimo.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org,
> > servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> > Subject: Ode Proposal
> > Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
> >
> > Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
> > OdeProposal. Please feel free to comment.
> >
> > We need some more mentors. Anyone?
>
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 15:56 +0000, James Strachan wrote:
> Dims & Sanjiva
>
> Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
> podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
> join us in the ODE proposal then we can have a united Apache
> community with folks from Agila, Geronimo, ServiceMix, & WS involved
> to insure plenty of cross pollination.
Wow I feel "special" to get asked liked this ;-).
I was going to ask to join anyway .. so I'll be happy to. However, I
would like to request some changes:
- Under warning signs, in the "Homogenous developers" category it lists
developers from Sybase, IBM & LogicBlaze. Is it the case that the
*current* codebase has contribs from all these companies? If not I
believe the spirit of the question is about the current codebase, not
about the group that'll get it thru incubation. So please indicate who
wrote the current codebase (which I believe is all Synbase).
- The initial committers list is very long. I'm on service-mix dev and I
see only 2-3 people committing (and little or no discussion; am I
missing some stuff??). Can we try to list people who are really going to
write code for this? It doesn't make sense to list *23* committers
unless they will really write code. We can always bring people on board
as they start contributing. If all these people are really so hot to
mess with a BPEL impl, damn, I should feel really good about BPEL ;-).
- Given the, um, strong feelings expressed by so many people about this
project, how about if we get the Incubator PMC to sponsor this poddling?
I'm a member of that PMC and I'll be happy to do it. That allows the
poddling to decide, upon graduation, its final resting place: Geronimo,
new TLP or elsewhere. (NO, I'm not even suggesting it go to WS .. as I
said earlier, WS is too damned crowded already.) I see *nothing* to be
gained by saying its going to be part of Geronimo at this point; so you
see my bias already: go for its own TLP. However, if that appears to be
the right thing upon graduation, then so be it.
Note that this does not preclude ServiceMix, or *anyone else* from
embracing and extending Apache Ode and living happily ever after. In
fact, its *much better* for Apache Ode to be on its own because then its
likely to be pluggable to more container frameworks and not just
Geronimo/ServiceMix.
Bye,
Sanjiva.
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
Dims & Sanjiva
Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
join us in the ODE proposal then we can have a united Apache
community with folks from Agila, Geronimo, ServiceMix, & WS involved
to insure plenty of cross pollination.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposa
James
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> Date: 14 February 2006 07:35:33 GMT
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org,
> servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Ode Proposal
> Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
>
> Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
> OdeProposal. Please feel free to comment.
>
> We need some more mentors. Anyone?
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
Dims & Sanjiva
Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
join us in the ODE proposal then we can have a united Apache
community with folks from Agila, Geronimo, ServiceMix, & WS involved
to insure plenty of cross pollination.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposa
James
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> Date: 14 February 2006 07:35:33 GMT
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org,
> servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Ode Proposal
> Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
>
> Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
> OdeProposal. Please feel free to comment.
>
> We need some more mentors. Anyone?
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Incubator Marker [was Re: Ode Proposal]
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gu...@worldonline.fr>.
It seems that it has been the common practive for incubating subprojects
(not TLP)
until this vote
http://www.mail-archive.com/general%40incubator.apache.org/msg05956.html.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>On Tuesday 14 February 2006 15:35, Alan D. Cabrera wrote to
>dev@geronimo.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org,
>servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
>
>
>I thought ServiceMix was in the Incubator. How come the mailing list seems to
>indicate something else?? Is this common practice for Geronimo sponsored
>podlings?
>
>
>Cheers
>Niclas
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Incubator Marker [was Re: Ode Proposal]
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>.
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 15:35, Alan D. Cabrera wrote to
dev@geronimo.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org,
servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
I thought ServiceMix was in the Incubator. How come the mailing list seems to
indicate something else?? Is this common practice for Geronimo sponsored
podlings?
Cheers
Niclas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Bill Flood <bi...@gmail.com>.
Alan, the Sybase developers that will work on this project are
Lance Waterman lance_lw@yahoo.com
Cory Harper cory.harper@gmail.com
John Childs John.childs@sybase.com
Jan-Hua Chu jchu@sybase.com
Sandip Ghayal sghayal@sybase.com
Bill
On 2/14/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
> Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
> Please feel free to comment.
>
> Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase developers that
> wish to work on this project? Can you get the Software Grant paperwork
> faxed in?
>
> Any other ASF committers want to jump in?
>
> We need some more mentors. Anyone?
>
> This is not meant to stop discussions about this donation, just to start
> the bureaucratic machinery while they take place.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
>
RE: Mentors, PMC, and oversight.
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> IMHO, there should probably be a max number of concurrent
> projects that one can be a mentor for. This would lead to
> a whole set of derived effects
> * Projects that turns inactive/dormant will be 'terminated'
> by the mentors, as they may want to help out other
> projects instead.
Or could be prematurely terminated if the mentors preferred to work on some
other project.
> * Potential Mentors may be a bit more selective and do more
> evaluation of the situation before accepting Mentorship.
But is that notion of selective beneficial?
> * As the most "active Mentors" get filled up, the circle of
> willing Mentors need to be expanded, and people putting
> together proposals have to actively persuade "fresh blood"
> to help out.
We are always encouraging new people to sign up. The current number of
Incubator PMC members is 41, of which 7 have been added this year alone.
> I have no opinion of "how many" is a good [max number of projects]
I don't believe that there is any such good number. The question is whether
or not a Mentors has the time, energy, and ability to perform the job. It
seems to me that such would vary greatly both with the demands of any given
podling, and other demands placed upon each Mentor. But this is another
reason for why we want multiple Mentors. Alex Karasulu set a nice example
recently, when he indicated that he was having difficulty meeting his
Mentoring responsibilities, and asked for others to volunteer as Mentors to
help out. And he was mentoring just one podling, so no such numeric rule
would have helped.
Personally, I favor fewer rules, and empowering trusted people to make human
decisions, rather than taking decisions from their hands.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Mentors, PMC, and oversight.
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>.
On Sunday 19 February 2006 02:24, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Sure, the entire PMC has a
> binding over over the entire Incubator, but no one can watch every project.
> So we need the Mentors to be active in the community.
IMHO, there should probably be a max number of concurrent projects that one
can be a mentor for. This would lead to a whole set of derived effects;
* Projects that turns inactive/dormant will be 'terminated' by the mentors,
as they may want to help out other projects instead.
* Potential Mentors may be a bit more selective and do more evaluation of the
situation before accepting Mentorship.
* As the most "active Mentors" get filled up, the circle of willing Mentors
need to be expanded, and people putting together proposals have to actively
persuade "fresh blood" to help out.
I have no opinion of "how many" is a good number.
WDYT?
Cheers
Niclas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: Mentors, PMC, and oversight.
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > The role of Mentor is an Incubator specific notion, having no
> > existence in the ASF legal structure. Members, Officers and
> > PMC Members, on the other hand, do.
> >
> > The Incubator PMC needs to maintain legal oversight over all of
> > its constituent projects, and as the Incubator grows, it becomes
> > vital that we be able to scale that oversight. This is, in part,
> > why I have been pushing to have at least three Mentors per project.
> > Sure, the entire PMC has a binding over over the entire Incubator,
> > but no one can watch every project. So we need the Mentors to be
> > active in the community. Not only are they there to provide
> > guidance, but to provide oversight. Only PMC members have binding
> > votes, as per the ASF bylaws, so Mentors need to be on the PMC in
> > order to have that binding vote.
> >
> > So really. a Mentor is a PMC member who is choosing to be active
> > and help in guiding the community.
> Thanks for the clarification. Should I update
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html
Well, we've needed to do some updating, but I've just posted "Incubator
Roles revisited", so we'll see what discussion falls out of it.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Mentors, PMC, and oversight.
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On 2/18/2006 10:24 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>
>
>>Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>
>>
>>>[X] is on the Incubator PMC, so he's on the Ode PPMC, and has
>>>chosen to actively participate. ASF Members are automatically
>>>eligible for he PMC, others [can be] elected.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>Does this also specifically also apply to the role of Mentor?
>>
>>
>
>The role of Mentor is an Incubator specific notion, having no existence in
>the ASF legal structure. Members, Officers and PMC Members, on the other
>hand, do.
>
>The Incubator PMC needs to maintain legal oversight over all of its
>constituent projects, and as the Incubator grows, it becomes vital that we
>be able to scale that oversight. This is, in part, why I have been pushing
>to have at least three Mentors per project. Sure, the entire PMC has a
>binding over over the entire Incubator, but no one can watch every project.
>So we need the Mentors to be active in the community. Not only are they
>there to provide guidance, but to provide oversight. Only PMC members have
>binding votes, as per the ASF bylaws, so Mentors need to be on the PMC in
>order to have that binding vote.
>
>So really. a Mentor is a PMC member who is choosing to be active and help in
>guiding the community.
>
>
Thanks for the clarification. Should I update
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html
to reflect this change?
Regards,
Alan
Mentors, PMC, and oversight.
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > [X] is on the Incubator PMC, so he's on the Ode PPMC, and has
> > chosen to actively participate. ASF Members are automatically
> > eligible for he PMC, others [can be] elected.
> Does this also specifically also apply to the role of Mentor?
The role of Mentor is an Incubator specific notion, having no existence in
the ASF legal structure. Members, Officers and PMC Members, on the other
hand, do.
The Incubator PMC needs to maintain legal oversight over all of its
constituent projects, and as the Incubator grows, it becomes vital that we
be able to scale that oversight. This is, in part, why I have been pushing
to have at least three Mentors per project. Sure, the entire PMC has a
binding over over the entire Incubator, but no one can watch every project.
So we need the Mentors to be active in the community. Not only are they
there to provide guidance, but to provide oversight. Only PMC members have
binding votes, as per the ASF bylaws, so Mentors need to be on the PMC in
order to have that binding vote.
So really. a Mentor is a PMC member who is choosing to be active and help in
guiding the community.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On 2/17/2006 9:26 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>IIUC, you must be a made man to be a mentor.
>>
>>
>
>Actually, Paul is on the Incubator PMC, so he's on the Ode PPMC, and has
>chosen to actively participate. ASF Members are automatically eligible for
>the PMC, others, such as Paul, are elected.
>
>
Does this also specifically also apply to the role of Mentor?
Regards,
ALan
RE: Ode Proposal
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
> IIUC, you must be a made man to be a mentor.
Actually, Paul is on the Incubator PMC, so he's on the Ode PPMC, and has
chosen to actively participate. ASF Members are automatically eligible for
the PMC, others, such as Paul, are elected.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
IIUC, you must be a made man to be a mentor.
Regards,
Alan
Paul Fremantle wrote, On 2/17/2006 1:26 AM:
> Folks
>
> I have added myself in the wiki as a mentor and committer. I hope thats ok
> with everyone.
>
> Paul
>
> On 2/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>>really. I thought he was joking.... or some other Paul Brown...
>>
>>Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>
>>>You kidding me????? Please join us. "relatively familiar with BPEL and
>>>with the PXE codebase" is the understatment of the year.
>>>
>>>-- dims
>>>
>>>On 2/16/06, Paul Brown <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 2/16/06, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I'm also keen to join in. I'm very positive about ODE and I'm looking
>>>>>forward to it.
>>>>
>>>>How can a member of the community at large participate in the process?
>>>> (I'm relatively familiar with BPEL and with the PXE codebase...)
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>paulrbrown@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Paul Fremantle
> VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>
> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> paul@wso2.com
>
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>.
Folks
I have added myself in the wiki as a mentor and committer. I hope thats ok
with everyone.
Paul
On 2/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> really. I thought he was joking.... or some other Paul Brown...
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > You kidding me????? Please join us. "relatively familiar with BPEL and
> > with the PXE codebase" is the understatment of the year.
> >
> > -- dims
> >
> > On 2/16/06, Paul Brown <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 2/16/06, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> I'm also keen to join in. I'm very positive about ODE and I'm looking
> >>> forward to it.
> >> How can a member of the community at large participate in the process?
> >> (I'm relatively familiar with BPEL and with the PXE codebase...)
> >>
> >> --
> >> paulrbrown@gmail.com
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
paul@wso2.com
"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>.
really. I thought he was joking.... or some other Paul Brown...
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> You kidding me????? Please join us. "relatively familiar with BPEL and
> with the PXE codebase" is the understatment of the year.
>
> -- dims
>
> On 2/16/06, Paul Brown <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2/16/06, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm also keen to join in. I'm very positive about ODE and I'm looking
>>> forward to it.
>> How can a member of the community at large participate in the process?
>> (I'm relatively familiar with BPEL and with the PXE codebase...)
>>
>> --
>> paulrbrown@gmail.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
You kidding me????? Please join us. "relatively familiar with BPEL and
with the PXE codebase" is the understatment of the year.
-- dims
On 2/16/06, Paul Brown <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/16/06, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm also keen to join in. I'm very positive about ODE and I'm looking
> > forward to it.
>
> How can a member of the community at large participate in the process?
> (I'm relatively familiar with BPEL and with the PXE codebase...)
>
> --
> paulrbrown@gmail.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Paul Brown <pa...@gmail.com>.
On 2/16/06, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm also keen to join in. I'm very positive about ODE and I'm looking
> forward to it.
How can a member of the community at large participate in the process?
(I'm relatively familiar with BPEL and with the PXE codebase...)
--
paulrbrown@gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Welcome aboard!
Regards,
Alan
Paul Fremantle wrote, On 2/16/2006 9:28 AM:
> Alan
>
> I'm also keen to join in. I'm very positive about ODE and I'm looking
> forward to it.
>
> Paul
>
> On 2/14/06, Bill Flood <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Alan, I would like to throw my name in the hat and become actively
>>involved.
>>
>>Bill Flood Sybase bill.f.flood@gmail.com
>>
>>On 2/14/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
>>>Please feel free to comment.
>>>
>>>Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase developers that
>>>wish to work on this project? Can you get the Software Grant paperwork
>>>faxed in?
>>>
>>>Any other ASF committers want to jump in?
>>>
>>>We need some more mentors. Anyone?
>>>
>>>This is not meant to stop discussions about this donation, just to start
>>>the bureaucratic machinery while they take place.
>>>
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Alan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Paul Fremantle
> VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>
> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
> paul@wso2.com
>
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>.
Alan
I'm also keen to join in. I'm very positive about ODE and I'm looking
forward to it.
Paul
On 2/14/06, Bill Flood <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Alan, I would like to throw my name in the hat and become actively
> involved.
>
> Bill Flood Sybase bill.f.flood@gmail.com
>
> On 2/14/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
> > Please feel free to comment.
> >
> > Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase developers that
> > wish to work on this project? Can you get the Software Grant paperwork
> > faxed in?
> >
> > Any other ASF committers want to jump in?
> >
> > We need some more mentors. Anyone?
> >
> > This is not meant to stop discussions about this donation, just to start
> > the bureaucratic machinery while they take place.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
paul@wso2.com
"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Bill Flood <bi...@gmail.com>.
Alan, I would like to throw my name in the hat and become actively involved.
Bill Flood Sybase bill.f.flood@gmail.com
On 2/14/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
> Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
> Please feel free to comment.
>
> Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase developers that
> wish to work on this project? Can you get the Software Grant paperwork
> faxed in?
>
> Any other ASF committers want to jump in?
>
> We need some more mentors. Anyone?
>
> This is not meant to stop discussions about this donation, just to start
> the bureaucratic machinery while they take place.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
>
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Bill Flood <bi...@gmail.com>.
Alan, the Sybase developers that will work on this project are
Lance Waterman lance_lw@yahoo.com
Cory Harper cory.harper@gmail.com
John Childs John.childs@sybase.com
Jan-Hua Chu jchu@sybase.com
Sandip Ghayal sghayal@sybase.com
Bill
On 2/14/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
> Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
> Please feel free to comment.
>
> Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase developers that
> wish to work on this project? Can you get the Software Grant paperwork
> faxed in?
>
> Any other ASF committers want to jump in?
>
> We need some more mentors. Anyone?
>
> This is not meant to stop discussions about this donation, just to start
> the bureaucratic machinery while they take place.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
>
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Bill Flood <bi...@gmail.com>.
Alan, I would like to throw my name in the hat and become actively involved.
Bill Flood Sybase bill.f.flood@gmail.com
On 2/14/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
> Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
> Please feel free to comment.
>
> Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase developers that
> wish to work on this project? Can you get the Software Grant paperwork
> faxed in?
>
> Any other ASF committers want to jump in?
>
> We need some more mentors. Anyone?
>
> This is not meant to stop discussions about this donation, just to start
> the bureaucratic machinery while they take place.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
>
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Bill Flood <bi...@gmail.com>.
Alan, I would like to throw my name in the hat and become actively involved.
Bill Flood Sybase bill.f.flood@gmail.com
On 2/14/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
> Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
> Please feel free to comment.
>
> Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase developers that
> wish to work on this project? Can you get the Software Grant paperwork
> faxed in?
>
> Any other ASF committers want to jump in?
>
> We need some more mentors. Anyone?
>
> This is not meant to stop discussions about this donation, just to start
> the bureaucratic machinery while they take place.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
>
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Bill Flood <bi...@gmail.com>.
Alan, the Sybase developers that will work on this project are
Lance Waterman lance_lw@yahoo.com
Cory Harper cory.harper@gmail.com
John Childs John.childs@sybase.com
Jan-Hua Chu jchu@sybase.com
Sandip Ghayal sghayal@sybase.com
Bill
On 2/14/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
> Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
> Please feel free to comment.
>
> Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase developers that
> wish to work on this project? Can you get the Software Grant paperwork
> faxed in?
>
> Any other ASF committers want to jump in?
>
> We need some more mentors. Anyone?
>
> This is not meant to stop discussions about this donation, just to start
> the bureaucratic machinery while they take place.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
>
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>.
The Geronimo PMC needs to vote on sponsoring this.
Before you do that, just to start the discussion :
- Why would the Geronimo PMC sponsor this?
- Isn't BPEL a bit far afield from J2EE, which is our charter as a PMC?
- How about bringing it to Agila, which already has a good start on BPEL
and workflow, and take the best from the Sybase contribution and the
best from Twister and combine?
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
> Please feel free to comment.
>
> Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase developers that
> wish to work on this project? Can you get the Software Grant paperwork
> faxed in?
> Any other ASF committers want to jump in?
>
> We need some more mentors. Anyone?
>
> This is not meant to stop discussions about this donation, just to start
> the bureaucratic machinery while they take place.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>.
The Geronimo PMC needs to vote on sponsoring this.
Before you do that, just to start the discussion :
- Why would the Geronimo PMC sponsor this?
- Isn't BPEL a bit far afield from J2EE, which is our charter as a PMC?
- How about bringing it to Agila, which already has a good start on BPEL
and workflow, and take the best from the Sybase contribution and the
best from Twister and combine?
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
> Please feel free to comment.
>
> Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase developers that
> wish to work on this project? Can you get the Software Grant paperwork
> faxed in?
> Any other ASF committers want to jump in?
>
> We need some more mentors. Anyone?
>
> This is not meant to stop discussions about this donation, just to start
> the bureaucratic machinery while they take place.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
Dims & Sanjiva
Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new
podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to
join us in the ODE proposal then we can have a united Apache
community with folks from Agila, Geronimo, ServiceMix, & WS involved
to insure plenty of cross pollination.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposa
James
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> Date: 14 February 2006 07:35:33 GMT
> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org,
> servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Ode Proposal
> Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
>
> Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
> OdeProposal. Please feel free to comment.
>
> We need some more mentors. Anyone?
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>.
There is a chicken-egg problem here - I'm afraid that would make some
people unable to look at it.
I can understand not wanting to go through the pain of changing
namespace until needed, but can it be made available under the Apache
License (or another open source license of your choosing) for evaluation
purposes?
While you ponder that, can the evaluation license under which the
software is currently being offered be placed somewhere so we at least
know the terms before downloading?
geir
Bill Flood wrote:
> The source can be found here: ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/
>
> If the community goes forward with the project, in one form or another, we
> are prepared to immediately change the license to the Apache form and modify
> the package names spaces as appropriate.
>
> thanks
>
>
> On 2/14/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Wasn't it offered already to ServiceMix?
>>
>> I mean, people already voted on accepting the code, so I assume it's
>> available somewhere...
>>
>> geir
>>
>>
>> ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
>>> Great!
>>>
>>> I'm assuming the source won't be available for review unless/until Ode
>> is
>>> accepted as an incubator poddling?
>>>
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> It's better to be hated for who you are
>>> than loved for who you are not
>>>
>>> Ian D. Stewart
>>> Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
>>> JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
>>> Phone: (614) 244-2564
>>> Pager: (888) 260-0078
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> James Strachan
>>> <james.strachan@g To:
>> dev@geronimo.apache.org
>>> mail.com> cc:
>> general@incubator.apache.org, servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Ode
>> Proposal
>>> 02/14/2006 10:10
>>> AM
>>> Please respond to
>>> dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14 Feb 2006, at 15:03, ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
>>>> Allan,
>>>>
>>>> This proposal appears to be gear towards the web services/SOA
>>>> community.
>>>> Is support for orchestration of non-WS business processes
>>>> considered out of
>>>> scope for Ode?
>>> No - the code should be reusable for most orchestration needs; even
>>> in cases where there are no pointy brackets involved :).
>>>
>>> James
>>> -------
>>> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bill Flood wrote:
> The license is in the tarball and/or you can see it directly at
> ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/SourceCodeEvaluationAgreement.txt
> without dowloading the tarball.
Thanks, Bill, Cory!
- --
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBQ/IO4JrNPMCpn3XdAQKw6gQAwj6I0QdVPxhd4ymTlMa3ExqPI09LM+oo
+CJA10bLYwo9JJi2ErbWb+qeSUYEwdT0ElRBvG5vLMnOfrOTs1yuBTHbSrZb0/Lf
Dyl2UHBwzSTTPfMstH8aSkrNRqbymw19+X6cE3Yotbte3WZ+boE97dbp3R+jFX3T
NKYHgroDoI0=
=9Zuk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bill Flood wrote:
> The license is in the tarball and/or you can see it directly at
> ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/SourceCodeEvaluationAgreement.txt
> without dowloading the tarball.
Thanks, Bill, Cory!
- --
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBQ/IO4JrNPMCpn3XdAQKw6gQAwj6I0QdVPxhd4ymTlMa3ExqPI09LM+oo
+CJA10bLYwo9JJi2ErbWb+qeSUYEwdT0ElRBvG5vLMnOfrOTs1yuBTHbSrZb0/Lf
Dyl2UHBwzSTTPfMstH8aSkrNRqbymw19+X6cE3Yotbte3WZ+boE97dbp3R+jFX3T
NKYHgroDoI0=
=9Zuk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Bill Flood <bi...@gmail.com>.
The license is in the tarball and/or you can see it directly at
ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/SourceCodeEvaluationAgreement.txtwithout
dowloading the tarball.
On 2/14/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@golux.com> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bill Flood wrote:
> > The source can be found here:
> ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/
>
> - From one of the .java files:
>
> > * Confidential property of Sybase, Inc.
> > *
> > * Copyright 1987 - 2006.
> > *
> > * Sybase, Inc. All rights reserved.
> > * Unpublished rights reserved under U.S. copyright laws.
> > *
> > * This software contains confidential and trade secret information
> > * of Sybase, Inc.
>
> Hmm.
>
> - From the note James Strachan forwarded to servicemix-dev here:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/servicemix-dev%40geronimo.apache.org/msg00030.html
> it appears that the current tarball is 'currently licensed
> under a Sybase evaluation license.'
>
> Before proceeding, I'd like to know what the terms of
> that evaluation licence are. Can you provide a pointer
> to a copy? Is there one in the tarball?
> - --
> #ken P-)}
>
> Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
> Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
>
> "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iQCVAwUBQ/IHOZrNPMCpn3XdAQLLhAP/QC649wEE6miMVqZTedgkg8he8HxLp8zE
> jmQLbGg5IzK2O9M/xiNJ8lokpYVMvCjCsqq0JcdocM4aNufZWlsFEcKNwA38ggRP
> 2sKMRyvv+ZA0pDpuCuCf4pjxU90peira+L1YtD5DtM1CreMS63TvNQT69Lzm8RCn
> mS3qgvVblr8=
> =FPB6
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Bill Flood <bi...@gmail.com>.
The license is in the tarball and/or you can see it directly at
ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/SourceCodeEvaluationAgreement.txtwithout
dowloading the tarball.
On 2/14/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@golux.com> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bill Flood wrote:
> > The source can be found here:
> ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/
>
> - From one of the .java files:
>
> > * Confidential property of Sybase, Inc.
> > *
> > * Copyright 1987 - 2006.
> > *
> > * Sybase, Inc. All rights reserved.
> > * Unpublished rights reserved under U.S. copyright laws.
> > *
> > * This software contains confidential and trade secret information
> > * of Sybase, Inc.
>
> Hmm.
>
> - From the note James Strachan forwarded to servicemix-dev here:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/servicemix-dev%40geronimo.apache.org/msg00030.html
> it appears that the current tarball is 'currently licensed
> under a Sybase evaluation license.'
>
> Before proceeding, I'd like to know what the terms of
> that evaluation licence are. Can you provide a pointer
> to a copy? Is there one in the tarball?
> - --
> #ken P-)}
>
> Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
> Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
>
> "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iQCVAwUBQ/IHOZrNPMCpn3XdAQLLhAP/QC649wEE6miMVqZTedgkg8he8HxLp8zE
> jmQLbGg5IzK2O9M/xiNJ8lokpYVMvCjCsqq0JcdocM4aNufZWlsFEcKNwA38ggRP
> 2sKMRyvv+ZA0pDpuCuCf4pjxU90peira+L1YtD5DtM1CreMS63TvNQT69Lzm8RCn
> mS3qgvVblr8=
> =FPB6
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by cory <co...@gmail.com>.
The license is in the tarball. I've also put it at:
ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/
-cory
On 2/14/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@golux.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bill Flood wrote:
> > The source can be found here: ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/
>
> - From one of the .java files:
>
> > * Confidential property of Sybase, Inc.
> > *
> > * Copyright 1987 - 2006.
> > *
> > * Sybase, Inc. All rights reserved.
> > * Unpublished rights reserved under U.S. copyright laws.
> > *
> > * This software contains confidential and trade secret information
> > * of Sybase, Inc.
>
> Hmm.
>
> - From the note James Strachan forwarded to servicemix-dev here:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/servicemix-dev%40geronimo.apache.org/msg00030.html
> it appears that the current tarball is 'currently licensed
> under a Sybase evaluation license.'
>
> Before proceeding, I'd like to know what the terms of
> that evaluation licence are. Can you provide a pointer
> to a copy? Is there one in the tarball?
> - --
> #ken P-)}
>
> Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
> Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
>
> "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iQCVAwUBQ/IHOZrNPMCpn3XdAQLLhAP/QC649wEE6miMVqZTedgkg8he8HxLp8zE
> jmQLbGg5IzK2O9M/xiNJ8lokpYVMvCjCsqq0JcdocM4aNufZWlsFEcKNwA38ggRP
> 2sKMRyvv+ZA0pDpuCuCf4pjxU90peira+L1YtD5DtM1CreMS63TvNQT69Lzm8RCn
> mS3qgvVblr8=
> =FPB6
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by cory <co...@gmail.com>.
The license is in the tarball. I've also put it at:
ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/
-cory
On 2/14/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@golux.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bill Flood wrote:
> > The source can be found here: ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/
>
> - From one of the .java files:
>
> > * Confidential property of Sybase, Inc.
> > *
> > * Copyright 1987 - 2006.
> > *
> > * Sybase, Inc. All rights reserved.
> > * Unpublished rights reserved under U.S. copyright laws.
> > *
> > * This software contains confidential and trade secret information
> > * of Sybase, Inc.
>
> Hmm.
>
> - From the note James Strachan forwarded to servicemix-dev here:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/servicemix-dev%40geronimo.apache.org/msg00030.html
> it appears that the current tarball is 'currently licensed
> under a Sybase evaluation license.'
>
> Before proceeding, I'd like to know what the terms of
> that evaluation licence are. Can you provide a pointer
> to a copy? Is there one in the tarball?
> - --
> #ken P-)}
>
> Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
> Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
>
> "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iQCVAwUBQ/IHOZrNPMCpn3XdAQLLhAP/QC649wEE6miMVqZTedgkg8he8HxLp8zE
> jmQLbGg5IzK2O9M/xiNJ8lokpYVMvCjCsqq0JcdocM4aNufZWlsFEcKNwA38ggRP
> 2sKMRyvv+ZA0pDpuCuCf4pjxU90peira+L1YtD5DtM1CreMS63TvNQT69Lzm8RCn
> mS3qgvVblr8=
> =FPB6
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bill Flood wrote:
> The source can be found here: ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/
- From one of the .java files:
> * Confidential property of Sybase, Inc.
> *
> * Copyright 1987 - 2006.
> *
> * Sybase, Inc. All rights reserved.
> * Unpublished rights reserved under U.S. copyright laws.
> *
> * This software contains confidential and trade secret information
> * of Sybase, Inc.
Hmm.
- From the note James Strachan forwarded to servicemix-dev here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/servicemix-dev%40geronimo.apache.org/msg00030.html
it appears that the current tarball is 'currently licensed
under a Sybase evaluation license.'
Before proceeding, I'd like to know what the terms of
that evaluation licence are. Can you provide a pointer
to a copy? Is there one in the tarball?
- --
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBQ/IHOZrNPMCpn3XdAQLLhAP/QC649wEE6miMVqZTedgkg8he8HxLp8zE
jmQLbGg5IzK2O9M/xiNJ8lokpYVMvCjCsqq0JcdocM4aNufZWlsFEcKNwA38ggRP
2sKMRyvv+ZA0pDpuCuCf4pjxU90peira+L1YtD5DtM1CreMS63TvNQT69Lzm8RCn
mS3qgvVblr8=
=FPB6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by ia...@jpmchase.com.
Thanks Bill,
I've downloaded the tarball, though I probably won't have a chance to dig
into this until this evening.
Ian
It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not
Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078
Bill Flood
<bill.f.flood@gma To: dev@geronimo.apache.org, geir@pobox.com
il.com> cc:
Subject: Re: Ode Proposal
02/14/2006 11:10
AM
Please respond to
dev
The source can be found here: ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/
If the community goes forward with the project, in one form or another, we
are prepared to immediately change the license to the Apache form and
modify the package names spaces as appropriate.
thanks
On 2/14/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com> wrote:
Wasn't it offered already to ServiceMix?
I mean, people already voted on accepting the code, so I assume it's
available somewhere...
geir
ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
> Great!
>
> I'm assuming the source won't be available for review unless/until Ode
is
> accepted as an incubator poddling?
>
>
> Ian
>
> It's better to be hated for who you are
> than loved for who you are not
>
> Ian D. Stewart
> Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
> JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
> Phone: (614) 244-2564
> Pager: (888) 260-0078
>
>
>
> James Strachan
> <james.strachan@g To:
dev@geronimo.apache.org
> mail.com> cc:
general@incubator.apache.org, servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Ode
Proposal
> 02/14/2006 10:10
> AM
> Please respond to
> dev
>
>
>
>
>
> On 14 Feb 2006, at 15:03, ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
>> Allan,
>>
>> This proposal appears to be gear towards the web services/SOA
>> community.
>> Is support for orchestration of non-WS business processes
>> considered out of
>> scope for Ode?
>
> No - the code should be reusable for most orchestration needs; even
> in cases where there are no pointy brackets involved :).
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>
>
>
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Rodent of Unusual Size <Ke...@Golux.Com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bill Flood wrote:
> The source can be found here: ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/
- From one of the .java files:
> * Confidential property of Sybase, Inc.
> *
> * Copyright 1987 - 2006.
> *
> * Sybase, Inc. All rights reserved.
> * Unpublished rights reserved under U.S. copyright laws.
> *
> * This software contains confidential and trade secret information
> * of Sybase, Inc.
Hmm.
- From the note James Strachan forwarded to servicemix-dev here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/servicemix-dev%40geronimo.apache.org/msg00030.html
it appears that the current tarball is 'currently licensed
under a Sybase evaluation license.'
Before proceeding, I'd like to know what the terms of
that evaluation licence are. Can you provide a pointer
to a copy? Is there one in the tarball?
- --
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBQ/IHOZrNPMCpn3XdAQLLhAP/QC649wEE6miMVqZTedgkg8he8HxLp8zE
jmQLbGg5IzK2O9M/xiNJ8lokpYVMvCjCsqq0JcdocM4aNufZWlsFEcKNwA38ggRP
2sKMRyvv+ZA0pDpuCuCf4pjxU90peira+L1YtD5DtM1CreMS63TvNQT69Lzm8RCn
mS3qgvVblr8=
=FPB6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Bill Flood <bi...@gmail.com>.
The source can be found here: ftp://ftp.sybase.com/pub/incoming/wcss/bpe/
If the community goes forward with the project, in one form or another, we
are prepared to immediately change the license to the Apache form and modify
the package names spaces as appropriate.
thanks
On 2/14/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Wasn't it offered already to ServiceMix?
>
> I mean, people already voted on accepting the code, so I assume it's
> available somewhere...
>
> geir
>
>
> ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
> > Great!
> >
> > I'm assuming the source won't be available for review unless/until Ode
> is
> > accepted as an incubator poddling?
> >
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > It's better to be hated for who you are
> > than loved for who you are not
> >
> > Ian D. Stewart
> > Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
> > JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
> > Phone: (614) 244-2564
> > Pager: (888) 260-0078
> >
> >
> >
> > James Strachan
> > <james.strachan@g To:
> dev@geronimo.apache.org
> > mail.com> cc:
> general@incubator.apache.org, servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Ode
> Proposal
> > 02/14/2006 10:10
> > AM
> > Please respond to
> > dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 14 Feb 2006, at 15:03, ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
> >> Allan,
> >>
> >> This proposal appears to be gear towards the web services/SOA
> >> community.
> >> Is support for orchestration of non-WS business processes
> >> considered out of
> >> scope for Ode?
> >
> > No - the code should be reusable for most orchestration needs; even
> > in cases where there are no pointy brackets involved :).
> >
> > James
> > -------
> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>.
Wasn't it offered already to ServiceMix?
I mean, people already voted on accepting the code, so I assume it's
available somewhere...
geir
ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
> Great!
>
> I'm assuming the source won't be available for review unless/until Ode is
> accepted as an incubator poddling?
>
>
> Ian
>
> It's better to be hated for who you are
> than loved for who you are not
>
> Ian D. Stewart
> Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
> JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
> Phone: (614) 244-2564
> Pager: (888) 260-0078
>
>
>
> James Strachan
> <james.strachan@g To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> mail.com> cc: general@incubator.apache.org, servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Ode Proposal
> 02/14/2006 10:10
> AM
> Please respond to
> dev
>
>
>
>
>
> On 14 Feb 2006, at 15:03, ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
>> Allan,
>>
>> This proposal appears to be gear towards the web services/SOA
>> community.
>> Is support for orchestration of non-WS business processes
>> considered out of
>> scope for Ode?
>
> No - the code should be reusable for most orchestration needs; even
> in cases where there are no pointy brackets involved :).
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>
>
>
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gu...@worldonline.fr>.
See
http://www.mail-archive.com/servicemix-dev%40geronimo.apache.org/msg00030.html
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
>Great!
>
>I'm assuming the source won't be available for review unless/until Ode is
>accepted as an incubator poddling?
>
>
>Ian
>
>It's better to be hated for who you are
>than loved for who you are not
>
>Ian D. Stewart
>Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
>JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
>Phone: (614) 244-2564
>Pager: (888) 260-0078
>
>
>
> James Strachan
> <james.strachan@g To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
> mail.com> cc: general@incubator.apache.org, servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Ode Proposal
> 02/14/2006 10:10
> AM
> Please respond to
> dev
>
>
>
>
>
>On 14 Feb 2006, at 15:03, ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
>
>
>>Allan,
>>
>>This proposal appears to be gear towards the web services/SOA
>>community.
>>Is support for orchestration of non-WS business processes
>>considered out of
>>scope for Ode?
>>
>>
>
>No - the code should be reusable for most orchestration needs; even
>in cases where there are no pointy brackets involved :).
>
>James
>-------
>http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by ia...@jpmchase.com.
Great!
I'm assuming the source won't be available for review unless/until Ode is
accepted as an incubator poddling?
Ian
It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not
Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078
James Strachan
<james.strachan@g To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
mail.com> cc: general@incubator.apache.org, servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ode Proposal
02/14/2006 10:10
AM
Please respond to
dev
On 14 Feb 2006, at 15:03, ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
> Allan,
>
> This proposal appears to be gear towards the web services/SOA
> community.
> Is support for orchestration of non-WS business processes
> considered out of
> scope for Ode?
No - the code should be reusable for most orchestration needs; even
in cases where there are no pointy brackets involved :).
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by ia...@jpmchase.com.
Great!
I'm assuming the source won't be available for review unless/until Ode is
accepted as an incubator poddling?
Ian
It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not
Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078
James Strachan
<james.strachan@g To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
mail.com> cc: general@incubator.apache.org, servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ode Proposal
02/14/2006 10:10
AM
Please respond to
dev
On 14 Feb 2006, at 15:03, ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
> Allan,
>
> This proposal appears to be gear towards the web services/SOA
> community.
> Is support for orchestration of non-WS business processes
> considered out of
> scope for Ode?
No - the code should be reusable for most orchestration needs; even
in cases where there are no pointy brackets involved :).
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 14 Feb 2006, at 15:03, ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
> Allan,
>
> This proposal appears to be gear towards the web services/SOA
> community.
> Is support for orchestration of non-WS business processes
> considered out of
> scope for Ode?
No - the code should be reusable for most orchestration needs; even
in cases where there are no pointy brackets involved :).
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 14 Feb 2006, at 15:03, ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
> Allan,
>
> This proposal appears to be gear towards the web services/SOA
> community.
> Is support for orchestration of non-WS business processes
> considered out of
> scope for Ode?
No - the code should be reusable for most orchestration needs; even
in cases where there are no pointy brackets involved :).
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 14 Feb 2006, at 15:03, ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
> Allan,
>
> This proposal appears to be gear towards the web services/SOA
> community.
> Is support for orchestration of non-WS business processes
> considered out of
> scope for Ode?
No - the code should be reusable for most orchestration needs; even
in cases where there are no pointy brackets involved :).
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by ia...@jpmchase.com.
Allan,
This proposal appears to be gear towards the web services/SOA community.
Is support for orchestration of non-WS business processes considered out of
scope for Ode?
Thanks,
Ian
It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not
Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078
"Alan D. Cabrera"
<list@toolazydogs To: dev@geronimo.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org,
.com> servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
cc:
02/14/2006 02:35 Subject: Ode Proposal
AM
Please respond to
dev
Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
Please feel free to comment.
Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase developers that
wish to work on this project? Can you get the Software Grant paperwork
faxed in?
Any other ASF committers want to jump in?
We need some more mentors. Anyone?
This is not meant to stop discussions about this donation, just to start
the bureaucratic machinery while they take place.
Regards,
Alan
Re: Ode Proposal
Posted by ia...@jpmchase.com.
Allan,
This proposal appears to be gear towards the web services/SOA community.
Is support for orchestration of non-WS business processes considered out of
scope for Ode?
Thanks,
Ian
It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not
Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078
"Alan D. Cabrera"
<list@toolazydogs To: dev@geronimo.apache.org, general@incubator.apache.org,
.com> servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
cc:
02/14/2006 02:35 Subject: Ode Proposal
AM
Please respond to
dev
Ok. Here's the proposal http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OdeProposal.
Please feel free to comment.
Bill Flood, can you provide us with the list of Sybase developers that
wish to work on this project? Can you get the Software Grant paperwork
faxed in?
Any other ASF committers want to jump in?
We need some more mentors. Anyone?
This is not meant to stop discussions about this donation, just to start
the bureaucratic machinery while they take place.
Regards,
Alan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org