You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@jakarta.apache.org by Ellis Teer <e_...@yahoo.com> on 2001/04/14 05:36:04 UTC
mod_jk.so vs mod_jk.dll for Win32 and Apache 1.3.19
I currently use Apache1.3.14 + Tomcat 3.2.1 + mod_jk.dll on Win32.
I recently tried to upgrade to Apache 1.3.19. When I try the LoadModule
command in the server configuration file on mod_jk using the mod_jk.dll file
the server would not start. If I comment out that one LoadModule command the
server starts.
I noticed in the Win32 version ALL the modules now have .so endings. Is this a
change in the Win32 version. Do I need a mod_jk.so or different mod_jk.dll
file for Win32?
-Ellis Teer
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: mod_jk.so vs mod_jk.dll for Win32 and Apache 1.3.19
Posted by e_teer <e_...@yahoo.com>.
Thanks Jon,
I monitor this list. Even the entire CVS binaries conversation =).
I also heard that recording before when others have incorrectly
posted here. Then I do a fool thing like posting to the wrong one.
Since I screwed up and posted here I thought I would add something.
As an end user, if had to choose, I would much prefer to get each
needed .jar and put together an application rather than each
application bringing along its own .jars and its dependencies when I
already have them.
-Ellis Teer
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001 01:56:04 -0700, Jon Stevens wrote:
>on 4/13/01 8:36 PM, "Ellis Teer" <e_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> I currently use Apache1.3.14 + Tomcat 3.2.1 + mod_jk.dll on Win32.
>>
>> I recently tried to upgrade to Apache 1.3.19. When I try the
>>LoadModule
>> command in the server configuration file on mod_jk using the
>>mod_jk.dll file
>> the server would not start. If I comment out that one LoadModule
>>command the
>> server starts.
>>
>> I noticed in the Win32 version ALL the modules now have .so
>>endings. Is this
>> a
>> change in the Win32 version. Do I need a mod_jk.so or different
>>mod_jk.dll
>> file for Win32?
>>
>> -Ellis Teer
>
><robot tone>
>This is a recording. You must post user questions to the user list.
>This is
>not a user list. This is the general list. The user list you need is
>the
>Tomcat user list. The reason is because that is a Tomcat question
>and you
>should post to the user list. This message will self destruct in 5
>seconds.
>Beep.
></robot tone>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org
-- e_teer, e_teer@yahoo.com on 04/14/2001
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: mod_jk.so vs mod_jk.dll for Win32 and Apache 1.3.19
Posted by Jon Stevens <jo...@latchkey.com>.
on 4/13/01 8:36 PM, "Ellis Teer" <e_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I currently use Apache1.3.14 + Tomcat 3.2.1 + mod_jk.dll on Win32.
>
> I recently tried to upgrade to Apache 1.3.19. When I try the LoadModule
> command in the server configuration file on mod_jk using the mod_jk.dll file
> the server would not start. If I comment out that one LoadModule command the
> server starts.
>
> I noticed in the Win32 version ALL the modules now have .so endings. Is this
> a
> change in the Win32 version. Do I need a mod_jk.so or different mod_jk.dll
> file for Win32?
>
> -Ellis Teer
<robot tone>
This is a recording. You must post user questions to the user list. This is
not a user list. This is the general list. The user list you need is the
Tomcat user list. The reason is because that is a Tomcat question and you
should post to the user list. This message will self destruct in 5 seconds.
Beep.
</robot tone>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org