You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@jena.apache.org by Marco Neumann <ma...@gmail.com> on 2012/03/25 17:42:59 UTC
bind doesn't work in fuseki vs joseki
hi
the following query executes as expect in joseki (joseki-3.4.4)
http://www.lotico.com:2020/lotico?query=SELECT+%3FdayName+%3FdayIDCheck%0D%0AWHERE+%7B%0D%0ABIND+%28%3FdayIDCheck+AS+%3FDA%29%0D%0ABIND+%280+AS+%3FDB%29%0D%0AFILTER+%28%3FDB+%3D+%3FDA+%29%0D%0A%7D%0D%0A%0D%0ABINDINGS+%3FdayIDCheck+%3FdayName+%7B%0D%0A++++%280+%22Sunday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%281+%22Monday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%282+%22Tuesday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%283+%22Wednesday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%284+%22Thursday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%285+%22Friday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%286+%22Saturday%22%40en%29%0D%0A%7D&default-graph-uri=&output=xml&stylesheet=%2Fxml-to-html.xsl
but doesn't "bind" correctly in fuseki (Fuseki - version
0.2.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT (Build date: 2012-03-22T05:04:16+0000))
http://www.lotico.com:3030/lotico/query?query=SELECT+%3FdayName+%3FdayIDCheck%0D%0AWHERE+%7B%0D%0ABIND+%28%3FdayIDCheck+AS+%3FDA%29%0D%0ABIND+%280+AS+%3FDB%29%0D%0AFILTER+%28%3FDB+%3D+%3FDA+%29%0D%0A%7D%0D%0A%0D%0ABINDINGS+%3FdayIDCheck+%3FdayName+%7B%0D%0A++++%280+%22Sunday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%281+%22Monday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%282+%22Tuesday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%283+%22Wednesday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%284+%22Thursday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%285+%22Friday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%286+%22Saturday%22%40en%29%0D%0A%7D&output=text&stylesheet=%2Fxml-to-html.xsl
--
---
Marco Neumann
KONA
Join us at SemTech Biz in San Francisco June 3-7 2012 and save 15%
with the lotico community discount code 'STMN'
http://www.lotico.com/evt/SemTechSF2012/
Re: bind doesn't work in fuseki vs joseki
Posted by Marco Neumann <ma...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> because Joseki has an old version of ARQ with a bug (or pre-WG decision)
> semantic and Fuseki gets it right :-(
>
> See answer to: (and vote it up!)
Sorry, but you don't have enough points to upvote yet. :-)
>
> http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/15441/cases-in-sparql-11
>
> If you think this is a bad choice of semantics, comment to the SPARQL-WG.
> I'd support a change -- I wanted substitution semantics AKA a loop of each
> possible bindings. Current join semantics requires the variable to be used
> in a triple pattern to be useful.
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> On 25/03/12 16:42, Marco Neumann wrote:
>>
>> hi
>>
>> the following query executes as expect in joseki (joseki-3.4.4)
>>
>>
>> http://www.lotico.com:2020/lotico?query=SELECT+%3FdayName+%3FdayIDCheck%0D%0AWHERE+%7B%0D%0ABIND+%28%3FdayIDCheck+AS+%3FDA%29%0D%0ABIND+%280+AS+%3FDB%29%0D%0AFILTER+%28%3FDB+%3D+%3FDA+%29%0D%0A%7D%0D%0A%0D%0ABINDINGS+%3FdayIDCheck+%3FdayName+%7B%0D%0A++++%280+%22Sunday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%281+%22Monday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%282+%22Tuesday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%283+%22Wednesday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%284+%22Thursday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%285+%22Friday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%286+%22Saturday%22%40en%29%0D%0A%7D&default-graph-uri=&output=xml&stylesheet=%2Fxml-to-html.xsl
>>
>> but doesn't "bind" correctly in fuseki (Fuseki - version
>> 0.2.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT (Build date: 2012-03-22T05:04:16+0000))
>>
>>
>> http://www.lotico.com:3030/lotico/query?query=SELECT+%3FdayName+%3FdayIDCheck%0D%0AWHERE+%7B%0D%0ABIND+%28%3FdayIDCheck+AS+%3FDA%29%0D%0ABIND+%280+AS+%3FDB%29%0D%0AFILTER+%28%3FDB+%3D+%3FDA+%29%0D%0A%7D%0D%0A%0D%0ABINDINGS+%3FdayIDCheck+%3FdayName+%7B%0D%0A++++%280+%22Sunday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%281+%22Monday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%282+%22Tuesday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%283+%22Wednesday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%284+%22Thursday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%285+%22Friday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%286+%22Saturday%22%40en%29%0D%0A%7D&output=text&stylesheet=%2Fxml-to-html.xsl
>>
>
--
---
Marco Neumann
KONA
Join us at SemTech Biz in San Francisco June 3-7 2012 and save 15%
with the lotico community discount code 'STMN'
http://www.lotico.com/evt/SemTechSF2012/
Re: bind doesn't work in fuseki vs joseki
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
because Joseki has an old version of ARQ with a bug (or pre-WG decision)
semantic and Fuseki gets it right :-(
See answer to: (and vote it up!)
http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/15441/cases-in-sparql-11
If you think this is a bad choice of semantics, comment to the
SPARQL-WG. I'd support a change -- I wanted substitution semantics AKA
a loop of each possible bindings. Current join semantics requires the
variable to be used in a triple pattern to be useful.
Andy
On 25/03/12 16:42, Marco Neumann wrote:
> hi
>
> the following query executes as expect in joseki (joseki-3.4.4)
>
> http://www.lotico.com:2020/lotico?query=SELECT+%3FdayName+%3FdayIDCheck%0D%0AWHERE+%7B%0D%0ABIND+%28%3FdayIDCheck+AS+%3FDA%29%0D%0ABIND+%280+AS+%3FDB%29%0D%0AFILTER+%28%3FDB+%3D+%3FDA+%29%0D%0A%7D%0D%0A%0D%0ABINDINGS+%3FdayIDCheck+%3FdayName+%7B%0D%0A++++%280+%22Sunday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%281+%22Monday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%282+%22Tuesday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%283+%22Wednesday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%284+%22Thursday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%285+%22Friday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%286+%22Saturday%22%40en%29%0D%0A%7D&default-graph-uri=&output=xml&stylesheet=%2Fxml-to-html.xsl
>
> but doesn't "bind" correctly in fuseki (Fuseki - version
> 0.2.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT (Build date: 2012-03-22T05:04:16+0000))
>
> http://www.lotico.com:3030/lotico/query?query=SELECT+%3FdayName+%3FdayIDCheck%0D%0AWHERE+%7B%0D%0ABIND+%28%3FdayIDCheck+AS+%3FDA%29%0D%0ABIND+%280+AS+%3FDB%29%0D%0AFILTER+%28%3FDB+%3D+%3FDA+%29%0D%0A%7D%0D%0A%0D%0ABINDINGS+%3FdayIDCheck+%3FdayName+%7B%0D%0A++++%280+%22Sunday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%281+%22Monday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%282+%22Tuesday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%283+%22Wednesday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%284+%22Thursday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%285+%22Friday%22%40en%29%0D%0A++++%286+%22Saturday%22%40en%29%0D%0A%7D&output=text&stylesheet=%2Fxml-to-html.xsl
>