You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Peter Petersson <pe...@pmb.mine.nu> on 2007/09/04 09:42:08 UTC
Status of Geronimo 1.1.1 plugins not yet in 2.0.1 ?
Hi
There are few G v1.1.1 plugins not yet available in 2.0.1 which is
understandable as 2.0.1 has not been around very long. Would be great to
hear what the plans and status are for them in G v2.0.1.
We (me and my colleagues) and probably other users miss one in
particular and this is the very neat and useful geronimo-quartz plugin
and I am wondering what the plans are for it in G 2.0.1 Aaron?
thanks
Peter Petersson
Re: Status of Geronimo 1.1.1 plugins not yet in 2.0.1 ?
Posted by Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>.
OK, done.
Thanks,
Aaron
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On May 27, 2008, at 10:41 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
> What path should I put it in as?
>
> Something
> like: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/quartz-plugin
> or https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/aaron-plugins
> Thanks!
> --kevan
>
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Sep 5, 2007, at 3:05 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
>
> On Sep 5, 2007, at 2:14 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
> I can post the whole Quartz plugin to a Jira and tick the ASL granted
>
> box if that will make things easy.
>
> That sounds fine. IIUC we would then use the IP clearance process as
>
> described here:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance
>
> Or since you're a committer we could avoid that by committing directly to
>
> apache SVN if that's easier for you. I can provide you with a patch that
>
> would insert all the necessary copyright headers prior to committing if you
>
> like.
>
> Either way I'm available to help.
>
> Time to get quartz running again.
>
> Aaron,
>
> Would you be willing to check your plugin into geronimo sandbox? Not
>
> necessary, but makes things slightly simpler...
>
> --kevan
>
>
Re: Status of Geronimo 1.1.1 plugins not yet in 2.0.1 ?
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On May 27, 2008, at 10:41 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> What path should I put it in as?
Something like: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/quartz-plugin
or https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/aaron-plugins
Thanks!
--kevan
>
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Kevan Miller
> <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 5, 2007, at 3:05 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 5, 2007, at 2:14 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>>
>> I can post the whole Quartz plugin to a Jira and tick the ASL granted
>>
>> box if that will make things easy.
>>
>> That sounds fine. IIUC we would then use the IP clearance process as
>> described here:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance
>>
>> Or since you're a committer we could avoid that by committing
>> directly to
>> apache SVN if that's easier for you. I can provide you with a
>> patch that
>> would insert all the necessary copyright headers prior to
>> committing if you
>> like.
>>
>> Either way I'm available to help.
>>
>> Time to get quartz running again.
>> Aaron,
>> Would you be willing to check your plugin into geronimo sandbox? Not
>> necessary, but makes things slightly simpler...
>> --kevan
Re: Status of Geronimo 1.1.1 plugins not yet in 2.0.1 ?
Posted by Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>.
What path should I put it in as?
Thanks,
Aaron
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 5, 2007, at 3:05 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
>
> On Sep 5, 2007, at 2:14 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
> I can post the whole Quartz plugin to a Jira and tick the ASL granted
>
> box if that will make things easy.
>
> That sounds fine. IIUC we would then use the IP clearance process as
> described here:
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance
>
> Or since you're a committer we could avoid that by committing directly to
> apache SVN if that's easier for you. I can provide you with a patch that
> would insert all the necessary copyright headers prior to committing if you
> like.
>
> Either way I'm available to help.
>
> Time to get quartz running again.
> Aaron,
> Would you be willing to check your plugin into geronimo sandbox? Not
> necessary, but makes things slightly simpler...
> --kevan
Re: Status of Geronimo 1.1.1 plugins not yet in 2.0.1 ?
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Sep 5, 2007, at 3:05 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
> On Sep 5, 2007, at 2:14 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
>> I can post the whole Quartz plugin to a Jira and tick the ASL granted
>> box if that will make things easy.
>
> That sounds fine. IIUC we would then use the IP clearance process
> as described here:
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance
>
> Or since you're a committer we could avoid that by committing
> directly to apache SVN if that's easier for you. I can provide you
> with a patch that would insert all the necessary copyright headers
> prior to committing if you like.
>
> Either way I'm available to help.
Time to get quartz running again.
Aaron,
Would you be willing to check your plugin into geronimo sandbox? Not
necessary, but makes things slightly simpler...
--kevan
Re: Status of Geronimo 1.1.1 plugins not yet in 2.0.1 ?
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Sep 5, 2007, at 2:14 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> I can post the whole Quartz plugin to a Jira and tick the ASL granted
> box if that will make things easy.
That sounds fine. IIUC we would then use the IP clearance process as
described here:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance
Or since you're a committer we could avoid that by committing
directly to apache SVN if that's easier for you. I can provide you
with a patch that would insert all the necessary copyright headers
prior to committing if you like.
Either way I'm available to help.
> It may also require the plugin support module for the deployment
> integration. My recollection is that we already added that to Apache,
> but we ought to confirm. It would surely require some updates for
> 2.0, but perhaps we can avoid things like the console integration code
> and the deploy-as-part-of-WAR code if that's not something that's
> needed right away.
I'm not sure if the support module is at Apache yet. If not then
right now is a good time to look into merging those enhancements into
the server since we are making several enhancements to the plugin
framework right now. Like David Jencks just added the ability to
automatically create geronimo-plugin.xml using the car-maven-
plugin. And for the admin console we're using a newer version of
pluto so that plugins can dynamically add/remove portlets.
Best wishes,
Paul
Re: Status of Geronimo 1.1.1 plugins not yet in 2.0.1 ?
Posted by Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>.
I can post the whole Quartz plugin to a Jira and tick the ASL granted
box if that will make things easy.
It may also require the plugin support module for the deployment
integration. My recollection is that we already added that to Apache,
but we ought to confirm. It would surely require some updates for
2.0, but perhaps we can avoid things like the console integration code
and the deploy-as-part-of-WAR code if that's not something that's
needed right away.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 9/5/07, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Peter, I agree that quartz would be an excellent plugin for Geronimo
> 2.0. If creating a new area at geronimo/plugins/quartz would help us
> collaborate on that effort then that sounds fine to me. Taking a
> quick glance through the quartz plugin sources at :
> http://gplugins.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gplugins/quartz/trunk/
> it looks like most of the java files have the apache software license
> header but many of the XML, JSP, pom, etc. files do not. If Aaron
> likes the idea of donating the plugin sources to ASF then I'm ready
> to help with whatever approach works best for him.
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
>
> On Sep 5, 2007, at 3:42 AM, Peter Petersson wrote:
>
> > Aaron Mulder wrote:
> >> I'm pretty tight for time right now, though I could certainly advise
> >> someone if they were interested in doing the porting to 2.x. I don't
> >> care if it's done at SF or if the code is sucked over to Apache.
> >>
> > Hi Aaron
> > Thank you for your reply. I checked out the code yesterday and took
> > a quick look at it.
> > If I get it somewhat running I send you a patch but I would also
> > prefer to "check in" the code at geronimo/plugins.
> >
> > If the rest of you agree on moving the code? and if the following
> > is advisable I could supply a untouched patch In a Jira for someone
> > to set up in geronimo/plugins.
> > In my opinion this plugin is quite useful and if not anyone else
> > have time to work on it I will certainly try to get it ported as it
> > is the only thing holding us back from migrating to G2.0.1.
> >
> > regards
> > Peter Petersson
> >> Thanks,
> >> Aaron
> >>
> >> On 9/4/07, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I agree that it would be really great to have updated versions of
> >>> all
> >>> the 1.x plugins. I don't know if there are any plans to update the
> >>> plugins at http://gplugins.sourceforge.net/ for Geronimo 2.x. If
> >>> that's not likely to happen then we should be able to use Geronimo's
> >>> svn and plugin repository at least for the Quartz plugin since it's
> >>> ASL 2.0. Or Aaron may have a better idea in mind.
> >>>
> >>> Best wishes,
> >>> Paul
> >>>
> >>> On Sep 4, 2007, at 3:42 AM, Peter Petersson wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Hi
> >>>>
> >>>> There are few G v1.1.1 plugins not yet available in 2.0.1 which is
> >>>> understandable as 2.0.1 has not been around very long. Would be
> >>>> great to hear what the plans and status are for them in G v2.0.1.
> >>>> We (me and my colleagues) and probably other users miss one in
> >>>> particular and this is the very neat and useful geronimo-quartz
> >>>> plugin and I am wondering what the plans are for it in G 2.0.1
> >>>> Aaron?
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks
> >>>> Peter Petersson
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
>
>
Re: Status of Geronimo 1.1.1 plugins not yet in 2.0.1 ?
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
Peter, I agree that quartz would be an excellent plugin for Geronimo
2.0. If creating a new area at geronimo/plugins/quartz would help us
collaborate on that effort then that sounds fine to me. Taking a
quick glance through the quartz plugin sources at :
http://gplugins.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gplugins/quartz/trunk/
it looks like most of the java files have the apache software license
header but many of the XML, JSP, pom, etc. files do not. If Aaron
likes the idea of donating the plugin sources to ASF then I'm ready
to help with whatever approach works best for him.
Best wishes,
Paul
On Sep 5, 2007, at 3:42 AM, Peter Petersson wrote:
> Aaron Mulder wrote:
>> I'm pretty tight for time right now, though I could certainly advise
>> someone if they were interested in doing the porting to 2.x. I don't
>> care if it's done at SF or if the code is sucked over to Apache.
>>
> Hi Aaron
> Thank you for your reply. I checked out the code yesterday and took
> a quick look at it.
> If I get it somewhat running I send you a patch but I would also
> prefer to "check in" the code at geronimo/plugins.
>
> If the rest of you agree on moving the code? and if the following
> is advisable I could supply a untouched patch In a Jira for someone
> to set up in geronimo/plugins.
> In my opinion this plugin is quite useful and if not anyone else
> have time to work on it I will certainly try to get it ported as it
> is the only thing holding us back from migrating to G2.0.1.
>
> regards
> Peter Petersson
>> Thanks,
>> Aaron
>>
>> On 9/4/07, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I agree that it would be really great to have updated versions of
>>> all
>>> the 1.x plugins. I don't know if there are any plans to update the
>>> plugins at http://gplugins.sourceforge.net/ for Geronimo 2.x. If
>>> that's not likely to happen then we should be able to use Geronimo's
>>> svn and plugin repository at least for the Quartz plugin since it's
>>> ASL 2.0. Or Aaron may have a better idea in mind.
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> On Sep 4, 2007, at 3:42 AM, Peter Petersson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> There are few G v1.1.1 plugins not yet available in 2.0.1 which is
>>>> understandable as 2.0.1 has not been around very long. Would be
>>>> great to hear what the plans and status are for them in G v2.0.1.
>>>> We (me and my colleagues) and probably other users miss one in
>>>> particular and this is the very neat and useful geronimo-quartz
>>>> plugin and I am wondering what the plans are for it in G 2.0.1
>>>> Aaron?
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> Peter Petersson
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: Status of Geronimo 1.1.1 plugins not yet in 2.0.1 ?
Posted by Peter Petersson <pe...@pmb.mine.nu>.
Aaron Mulder wrote:
> I'm pretty tight for time right now, though I could certainly advise
> someone if they were interested in doing the porting to 2.x. I don't
> care if it's done at SF or if the code is sucked over to Apache.
>
Hi Aaron
Thank you for your reply. I checked out the code yesterday and took a
quick look at it.
If I get it somewhat running I send you a patch but I would also prefer
to "check in" the code at geronimo/plugins.
If the rest of you agree on moving the code? and if the following is
advisable I could supply a untouched patch In a Jira for someone to set
up in geronimo/plugins.
In my opinion this plugin is quite useful and if not anyone else have
time to work on it I will certainly try to get it ported as it is the
only thing holding us back from migrating to G2.0.1.
regards
Peter Petersson
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
> On 9/4/07, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree that it would be really great to have updated versions of all
>> the 1.x plugins. I don't know if there are any plans to update the
>> plugins at http://gplugins.sourceforge.net/ for Geronimo 2.x. If
>> that's not likely to happen then we should be able to use Geronimo's
>> svn and plugin repository at least for the Quartz plugin since it's
>> ASL 2.0. Or Aaron may have a better idea in mind.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Paul
>>
>> On Sep 4, 2007, at 3:42 AM, Peter Petersson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> There are few G v1.1.1 plugins not yet available in 2.0.1 which is
>>> understandable as 2.0.1 has not been around very long. Would be
>>> great to hear what the plans and status are for them in G v2.0.1.
>>> We (me and my colleagues) and probably other users miss one in
>>> particular and this is the very neat and useful geronimo-quartz
>>> plugin and I am wondering what the plans are for it in G 2.0.1 Aaron?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> Peter Petersson
>>>
>>
>>
Re: Status of Geronimo 1.1.1 plugins not yet in 2.0.1 ?
Posted by Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>.
I'm pretty tight for time right now, though I could certainly advise
someone if they were interested in doing the porting to 2.x. I don't
care if it's done at SF or if the code is sucked over to Apache.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 9/4/07, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree that it would be really great to have updated versions of all
> the 1.x plugins. I don't know if there are any plans to update the
> plugins at http://gplugins.sourceforge.net/ for Geronimo 2.x. If
> that's not likely to happen then we should be able to use Geronimo's
> svn and plugin repository at least for the Quartz plugin since it's
> ASL 2.0. Or Aaron may have a better idea in mind.
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
> On Sep 4, 2007, at 3:42 AM, Peter Petersson wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > There are few G v1.1.1 plugins not yet available in 2.0.1 which is
> > understandable as 2.0.1 has not been around very long. Would be
> > great to hear what the plans and status are for them in G v2.0.1.
> > We (me and my colleagues) and probably other users miss one in
> > particular and this is the very neat and useful geronimo-quartz
> > plugin and I am wondering what the plans are for it in G 2.0.1 Aaron?
> >
> > thanks
> > Peter Petersson
>
>
>
Re: Status of Geronimo 1.1.1 plugins not yet in 2.0.1 ?
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
I agree that it would be really great to have updated versions of all
the 1.x plugins. I don't know if there are any plans to update the
plugins at http://gplugins.sourceforge.net/ for Geronimo 2.x. If
that's not likely to happen then we should be able to use Geronimo's
svn and plugin repository at least for the Quartz plugin since it's
ASL 2.0. Or Aaron may have a better idea in mind.
Best wishes,
Paul
On Sep 4, 2007, at 3:42 AM, Peter Petersson wrote:
> Hi
>
> There are few G v1.1.1 plugins not yet available in 2.0.1 which is
> understandable as 2.0.1 has not been around very long. Would be
> great to hear what the plans and status are for them in G v2.0.1.
> We (me and my colleagues) and probably other users miss one in
> particular and this is the very neat and useful geronimo-quartz
> plugin and I am wondering what the plans are for it in G 2.0.1 Aaron?
>
> thanks
> Peter Petersson