You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@opennlp.apache.org by Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com> on 2012/02/15 10:44:47 UTC
Custom format support
Hi all,
it would be nice to have a plugin mechanism to load a custom
format parser which is implemented in user code.
To add support for such a parser right now the parser must be registered
in the StreamFactoryRegistery class.
We could allow to pass in a class name in places where a format parser could
be passed in.
What do you think?
Jörn
Re: Custom format support
Posted by "william.colen@gmail.com" <wi...@gmail.com>.
Yes, I would use it.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Aliaksandr Autayeu
<al...@autayeu.com>wrote:
> Great idea, I like it.
>
> Aliaksandr
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > My idea was to just use the same argument and consider it to be
> > a class name in the case the lookup in the map fails.
> >
> > Jörn
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:30 PM, william.colen@gmail.com <
> > william.colen@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I think it would be possible to somehow pass in arguments to the parser
> > > factory.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > it would be nice to have a plugin mechanism to load a custom
> > > > format parser which is implemented in user code.
> > > >
> > > > To add support for such a parser right now the parser must be
> > registered
> > > > in the StreamFactoryRegistery class.
> > > >
> > > > We could allow to pass in a class name in places where a format
> parser
> > > > could
> > > > be passed in.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > > >
> > > > Jörn
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Custom format support
Posted by Aliaksandr Autayeu <al...@autayeu.com>.
Great idea, I like it.
Aliaksandr
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My idea was to just use the same argument and consider it to be
> a class name in the case the lookup in the map fails.
>
> Jörn
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:30 PM, william.colen@gmail.com <
> william.colen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I think it would be possible to somehow pass in arguments to the parser
> > factory.
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > it would be nice to have a plugin mechanism to load a custom
> > > format parser which is implemented in user code.
> > >
> > > To add support for such a parser right now the parser must be
> registered
> > > in the StreamFactoryRegistery class.
> > >
> > > We could allow to pass in a class name in places where a format parser
> > > could
> > > be passed in.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > Jörn
> > >
> >
>
Re: Custom format support
Posted by Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com>.
My idea was to just use the same argument and consider it to be
a class name in the case the lookup in the map fails.
Jörn
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:30 PM, william.colen@gmail.com <
william.colen@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> I think it would be possible to somehow pass in arguments to the parser
> factory.
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > it would be nice to have a plugin mechanism to load a custom
> > format parser which is implemented in user code.
> >
> > To add support for such a parser right now the parser must be registered
> > in the StreamFactoryRegistery class.
> >
> > We could allow to pass in a class name in places where a format parser
> > could
> > be passed in.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Jörn
> >
>
Re: Custom format support
Posted by "william.colen@gmail.com" <wi...@gmail.com>.
+1
I think it would be possible to somehow pass in arguments to the parser
factory.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Joern Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> it would be nice to have a plugin mechanism to load a custom
> format parser which is implemented in user code.
>
> To add support for such a parser right now the parser must be registered
> in the StreamFactoryRegistery class.
>
> We could allow to pass in a class name in places where a format parser
> could
> be passed in.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Jörn
>