You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de> on 2008/06/20 08:53:37 UTC
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper has been received and recorded.
This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we create a new project in the
Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want to use concepts of both
dictionary annotator components and create one new component?
-- Michael
Marshall Schor wrote:
> All committers have voted +1 to accept this.
>
> Voting +1
> Joern Kottmann
> Marshall Schor
> Thilo Goetz
> Michael Baessler
> Eddie Epstein
> Adam Lally
>
> Voting 0 - none
> Voting -1 - none
>
> The vote passes.
>
> As soon as we get a software grant recorded by the secretary, we can put
> the code into SVN.
>
> -Marshall
>
> Marshall Schor wrote:
>> Michael Tanenblatt has offered to donate ConceptMapper to Apache
>> UIMA. There was some discussion on the uima-users list about this.
>> Thread: http://markmail.org/message/mfuubh5are7vs5ua
>>
>> Please vote on whether or not to accept this donation (conditional on
>> receiving a software grant for it, of course)
>>
>> [ ] +1 Accept the donation of ConceptMapper into the Apache UIMA
>> sandbox
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't accept this donation - because ...
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Michael Baessler wrote:
>> When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper
>> has been received and recorded.
>> This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we
>> create a new project in the
>> Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want
>> to use concepts of both
>> dictionary annotator components and create one new component?
>>
>> -- Michael
>
> Since Michael T and you are doing all the work, I would
> just follow along with whatever you two think is best.
In addition to that principle, I would encourage the community to move
in the direction of convergence to fewer, well-thought-out components,
over time. This has to be carefully balanced with the "let a 1000
flowers bloom" principle, which permits new things to have room to develop.
-Marshall
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Michael Baessler wrote:
> Initial project setup is done. See issue UIMA-1033 for details
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1033
>
> Michael T. please check the readme.txt and add updates about the Software Grant if necessary.
>
I think we need an IP Clearance Form done for this. Any volunteers?
The basic process is to read up on any incubator list discussion to see
if this process has changed recently ;-) and then follow the process
outlined in incubator.a.o (click the ip clearance link on the left).
For convenience, I put the previous IP clearance forms in SVN under the
"site" (uima-website) project. The forms for this use the same Anakia
process that we use to generate the web site - so put the new form
you're creating under uima-website/xdocs/ip-clearances/xxxxx.xml
Build it running ant using the build-ip-clearances.xml build file (this
has different macros that the incubator page for this uses) to check
that it builds OK.
After doing all this, you have to get an Apache officer to fill in the
parts only they can do (like verifying the software grant is recorded),
and updating the official ip-clearances list on the incubator site page.
-Marshall
>
> -- Michael
>
> Michael Baessler wrote:
>
>> OK, I will try to set up an initial project with a Maven build and with pointers
>> where the documentation should be added. Let you know when it's done.
>>
>> -- Michael B.
>>
>> Michael Tanenblatt wrote:
>>
>>> My personal preference is to put ConceptMapper out as a separate project
>>> for now, then merge the two over time. Realistically, I am not sure I
>>> have a huge amount of time to figure out how to merge these things right
>>> now (I am going to be on vacation starting Wednesday for 2 1/2 weeks,
>>> then I'll have to catch up with all the things that piled up over that
>>> time...). Ultimately, I agree that there should be one annotator that
>>> does this job, not two.
>>>
>>> On Jun 20, 2008, at 3:30 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Michael Baessler wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper
>>>>> has been received and recorded.
>>>>> This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we
>>>>> create a new project in the
>>>>> Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want
>>>>> to use concepts of both
>>>>> dictionary annotator components and create one new component?
>>>>> -- Michael
>>>>>
>>>> Since Michael T and you are doing all the work, I would
>>>> just follow along with whatever you two think is best.
>>>>
>>>> --Thilo
>>>>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
Initial project setup is done. See issue UIMA-1033 for details
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1033
Michael T. please check the readme.txt and add updates about the Software Grant if necessary.
-- Michael
Michael Baessler wrote:
> OK, I will try to set up an initial project with a Maven build and with pointers
> where the documentation should be added. Let you know when it's done.
>
> -- Michael B.
>
> Michael Tanenblatt wrote:
>> My personal preference is to put ConceptMapper out as a separate project
>> for now, then merge the two over time. Realistically, I am not sure I
>> have a huge amount of time to figure out how to merge these things right
>> now (I am going to be on vacation starting Wednesday for 2 1/2 weeks,
>> then I'll have to catch up with all the things that piled up over that
>> time...). Ultimately, I agree that there should be one annotator that
>> does this job, not two.
>>
>> On Jun 20, 2008, at 3:30 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
>>
>>> Michael Baessler wrote:
>>>> When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper
>>>> has been received and recorded.
>>>> This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we
>>>> create a new project in the
>>>> Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want
>>>> to use concepts of both
>>>> dictionary annotator components and create one new component?
>>>> -- Michael
>>> Since Michael T and you are doing all the work, I would
>>> just follow along with whatever you two think is best.
>>>
>>> --Thilo
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
Posted by Michael Baessler <mb...@michael-baessler.de>.
OK, I will try to set up an initial project with a Maven build and with pointers
where the documentation should be added. Let you know when it's done.
-- Michael B.
Michael Tanenblatt wrote:
> My personal preference is to put ConceptMapper out as a separate project
> for now, then merge the two over time. Realistically, I am not sure I
> have a huge amount of time to figure out how to merge these things right
> now (I am going to be on vacation starting Wednesday for 2 1/2 weeks,
> then I'll have to catch up with all the things that piled up over that
> time...). Ultimately, I agree that there should be one annotator that
> does this job, not two.
>
> On Jun 20, 2008, at 3:30 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
>
>> Michael Baessler wrote:
>>> When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper
>>> has been received and recorded.
>>> This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we
>>> create a new project in the
>>> Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want
>>> to use concepts of both
>>> dictionary annotator components and create one new component?
>>> -- Michael
>>
>> Since Michael T and you are doing all the work, I would
>> just follow along with whatever you two think is best.
>>
>> --Thilo
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
Posted by Michael Tanenblatt <sl...@park-slope.net>.
My personal preference is to put ConceptMapper out as a separate
project for now, then merge the two over time. Realistically, I am not
sure I have a huge amount of time to figure out how to merge these
things right now (I am going to be on vacation starting Wednesday for
2 1/2 weeks, then I'll have to catch up with all the things that piled
up over that time...). Ultimately, I agree that there should be one
annotator that does this job, not two.
On Jun 20, 2008, at 3:30 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Michael Baessler wrote:
>> When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for
>> ConceptMapper has been received and recorded.
>> This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do
>> we create a new project in the
>> Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we
>> want to use concepts of both
>> dictionary annotator components and create one new component?
>> -- Michael
>
> Since Michael T and you are doing all the work, I would
> just follow along with whatever you two think is best.
>
> --Thilo
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Accept ConceptMapper into the Sandbox
Posted by Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>.
Michael Baessler wrote:
> When looking at issue UIMA-1033 the software grant for ConceptMapper has been received and recorded.
> This means we can put the code to SVN. So what is our strategy, do we create a new project in the
> Sandbox for ConceptMapper and treat it as new annotator or do we want to use concepts of both
> dictionary annotator components and create one new component?
>
> -- Michael
Since Michael T and you are doing all the work, I would
just follow along with whatever you two think is best.
--Thilo