You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jmeter-dev@jakarta.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/09/21 18:40:23 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23110] - JDBC Pool not completely cleaned up when in multiple thread groups

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23110>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23110

JDBC Pool not completely cleaned up when in multiple thread groups

jeremy_a@bigfoot.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED



------- Additional Comments From jeremy_a@bigfoot.com  2003-09-21 16:40 -------
Do both JDBC queries use the same JDBC URL?  My guess is that they do.  In this
case, I think the current JDBC sampler code will initialize both pools, but it
will only use one of them at runtime.  And, presumably, only clean up one of them.

I've been working on rewriting the JDBC connection pool, but I'm in the middle
of travelling and moving, so I won't be able to finish it until probably
mid-October.  You might want to try a recent nightly build -- the code I've
committed recently does fix a couple of issues with the connection pool.  But I
don't remember right now whether or not this particular problem is fixed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org