SVG Font Issue between FOP-0.94 and FOP-1.0

["karsten.klein" <ka...@icw.de>]

Hi all,

I'm new to the list so please be kind ;)

I'm currently investigating an issue in our documentation tool chain based
on DITA OT and FOP. The current FOP version used is FOP-0.94 in combination
with batik-all-1.7 and xmlgraphics-commons-1.4. With this combination of
versions everything is rendered correctly. In particular my SVGs and the
fonts in the SVG file are displayed as expected (as rendered in the SVG
Editor we use).

I'm currently trying to upgrade the toolkit to use the latest FOP version
(1.0) and everything is fine except for one thing. The fonts that are used
in the SVG files are not displayed correctly. I attached two snapshots to
illustrate what happens.

I found out that already version 0.95 of FOP shows this problem. So in
between 0.94 and 0.95 something must have changed that causes the issue.

I'm very grateful for any hints that help solving this issue. For the time
being we "can survive" with the older FOP version, but we I not very
confident staying on this old version.

For questions regarding the content/font types I have attached a sample SVG
file as well.

Thanks in advance...

Best regards,
Karsten

PS: there is also a second issue with rendering the sample SVG file with
regards to indentation of texts (some texts are rendered with an offset).
This problem however exists with all used FOP version so far. But this not
the main subject of this post.

LICENSE NOTE: no license is granted to use any attachment of this post other
than to help reproducing and solving the issues reported. Ownership and
copyright stays with the original author of this post and or the original
authors/providers of the files.
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SVG-Font-Issue-between-FOP-0.94-and-FOP-1.0-tp33763437p33763437.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org

Re: SVG Font Issue between FOP-0.94 and FOP-1.0

[Alexios Giotis <al...@gmail.com>]

Hi Karsten,

Since you waited so long this is not a pressing issue, I suggest to download a nightly build snapshot of the current trunk [1] and check if this is fixed. In the next few months, there will be a new FOP release. If this is not already fixed, then a minimal input XSL:FO (in addition to the SVG) would help looking further into this.

[1] http://ci.apache.org/projects/xmlgraphics/fop/snapshots/

Alexios Giotis



On May 4, 2012, at 10:42 AM, karsten.klein wrote:

> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm new to the list so please be kind ;)
> 
> I'm currently investigating an issue in our documentation tool chain based
> on DITA OT and FOP. The current FOP version used is FOP-0.94 in combination
> with batik-all-1.7 and xmlgraphics-commons-1.4. With this combination of
> versions everything is rendered correctly. In particular my SVGs and the
> fonts in the SVG file are displayed as expected (as rendered in the SVG
> Editor we use).
> 
> I'm currently trying to upgrade the toolkit to use the latest FOP version
> (1.0) and everything is fine except for one thing. The fonts that are used
> in the SVG files are not displayed correctly. I attached two snapshots to
> illustrate what happens.
> 
> I found out that already version 0.95 of FOP shows this problem. So in
> between 0.94 and 0.95 something must have changed that causes the issue.
> 
> I'm very grateful for any hints that help solving this issue. For the time
> being we "can survive" with the older FOP version, but we I not very
> confident staying on this old version.
> 
> For questions regarding the content/font types I have attached a sample SVG
> file as well.
> 
> Thanks in advance...
> 
> Best regards,
> Karsten
> 
> PS: there is also a second issue with rendering the sample SVG file with
> regards to indentation of texts (some texts are rendered with an offset).
> This problem however exists with all used FOP version so far. But this not
> the main subject of this post.
> 
> LICENSE NOTE: no license is granted to use any attachment of this post other
> than to help reproducing and solving the issues reported. Ownership and
> copyright stays with the original author of this post and or the original
> authors/providers of the files.
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SVG-Font-Issue-between-FOP-0.94-and-FOP-1.0-tp33763437p33763437.html
> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org