You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by "Hudson (Commented) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/10/19 11:38:10 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (TAP5-1702) T5 to log where it thinks the Application Module should be if not found

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13130470#comment-13130470 ] 

Hudson commented on TAP5-1702:
------------------------------

Integrated in tapestry-trunk-freestyle #587 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/tapestry-trunk-freestyle/587/])
    TAP5-1702 Warn the user if the application Module class could not be found

mlusetti : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1186048
Files : 
* /tapestry/tapestry5/trunk/tapestry-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tapestry5/internal/TapestryAppInitializer.java

                
> T5 to log where it thinks the Application Module should be if not found
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAP5-1702
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1702
>             Project: Tapestry 5
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: tapestry-core
>    Affects Versions: 5.3
>            Reporter: Steve Eynon
>            Assignee: Massimo Lusetti
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 5.3
>
>
> One Small Thing...
> ...could we please have a warning message logged when the default
> application module is not found on startup? Something like,
> "Could not find the application module 'com.mycompany.project.WoteverModule'"
> Because everytime (and it does seem to be *everytime*!) I start a new
> project I miss-type, miss-spell, deploy the wrong web-override.xml or
> do something that causes T5 to look in the wrong place for my Module.
> It would be really, really useful on these occasions if T5 told me
> where it was trying to look as oppose to silently moving on.
> I agree with the code comment that it's valid not to have a Module
> class, but if not found, if T5 was a bit more verbose in telling where
> it was attempting to look, that would be awesome!

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira