You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> on 2008/05/22 22:06:33 UTC

Re: svn commit: r658755 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.1/plugins/cxf/cxf/pom.xml

The top-level server pom specifies XmlSchema 1.3.1, so should we be 
overriding it here?  Wouldn't this cause 2 versions to be included in 
the final jee5 assemblies?


-Donald

gawor@apache.org wrote:
> Author: gawor
> Date: Wed May 21 09:49:15 2008
> New Revision: 658755
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=658755&view=rev
> Log:
> cxf 2.0.6 depends on XmlSchema 1.4.2
> 
> Modified:
>     geronimo/server/branches/2.1/plugins/cxf/cxf/pom.xml
> 
> Modified: geronimo/server/branches/2.1/plugins/cxf/cxf/pom.xml
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/branches/2.1/plugins/cxf/cxf/pom.xml?rev=658755&r1=658754&r2=658755&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- geronimo/server/branches/2.1/plugins/cxf/cxf/pom.xml (original)
> +++ geronimo/server/branches/2.1/plugins/cxf/cxf/pom.xml Wed May 21 09:49:15 2008
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
>          <dependency>
>              <groupId>org.apache.ws.commons.schema</groupId>
>              <artifactId>XmlSchema</artifactId>
> -            <version>1.2</version>
> +            <version>1.4.2</version>
>          </dependency>
>          <dependency>
>              <groupId>xml-resolver</groupId>
> 
> 
> 

Re: svn commit: r658755 - /geronimo/server/branches/2.1/plugins/cxf/cxf/pom.xml

Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
On May 22, 2008, at 4:06 PM, Donald Woods wrote:

> The top-level server pom specifies XmlSchema 1.3.1, so should we be  
> overriding it here?  Wouldn't this cause 2 versions to be included  
> in the final jee5 assemblies?

yes, and we need to be able to support situations like that.  In this  
case axis2 and cxf require different versions of the jar, which is  
just fine.

I have to admit that situations like this make me look a little more  
favorably on investigating osgi classloading, although it may not  
actually solve any problems compared with what we are doing now.

thanks
david jencks

>
>
>
> -Donald
>
> gawor@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: gawor
>> Date: Wed May 21 09:49:15 2008
>> New Revision: 658755
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=658755&view=rev
>> Log:
>> cxf 2.0.6 depends on XmlSchema 1.4.2
>> Modified:
>>   geronimo/server/branches/2.1/plugins/cxf/cxf/pom.xml
>> Modified: geronimo/server/branches/2.1/plugins/cxf/cxf/pom.xml
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/branches/2.1/plugins/cxf/cxf/pom.xml?rev=658755&r1=658754&r2=658755&view=diff
>> = 
>> = 
>> = 
>> = 
>> = 
>> = 
>> = 
>> = 
>> = 
>> =====================================================================
>> --- geronimo/server/branches/2.1/plugins/cxf/cxf/pom.xml (original)
>> +++ geronimo/server/branches/2.1/plugins/cxf/cxf/pom.xml Wed May 21  
>> 09:49:15 2008
>> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
>>        <dependency>
>>            <groupId>org.apache.ws.commons.schema</groupId>
>>            <artifactId>XmlSchema</artifactId>
>> -            <version>1.2</version>
>> +            <version>1.4.2</version>
>>        </dependency>
>>        <dependency>
>>            <groupId>xml-resolver</groupId>