Feature request for RdfViewable

[Adrian Gschwend <ml...@netlabs.org>]

Hi,

I raised a new issue:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-946

Currently RDF representations are quite static and I can't influence
much, this could be easily configured in RDF as well IMHO.

As an example if I have a foaf:Person I would like to be able to expand
on all foaf:knows of that foaf:Person.


cu

Adrian

Re: Feature request for RdfViewable

[Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>]

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Adrian Gschwend <ml...@netlabs.org> wrote:

> On 19.02.13 15:01, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote:
>
> Hi Reto,
>
> > Am I right that  http://vocab.netlabs.org/recipe#ingredient_domain
> > points to the property that should be expanded? In the simplest case
> > this would be an equilvalent to the query-param xPropObj. What we
> > would also need is the inverse, i.e. an equivalent to xProSubj. In
> > your example you might also want to expand the resource which has an
> > eg:employ property pointing to you.
>
> Good point, in the foaf:knows case this could be the people which
> foaf:know the foaf:Person I care about one could expand them too.
>
> I'm actually not supper happy with the terms I've choosen back then,
> maybe it's time to change that. What about ingredientProperty and
> ingredientInverseProperty?
>
> Sounds good to me.

I'll see that I can add a simple implementation. Any maybe add a usage
example to the archetype I'm working on.

Cheers,
Reto


> cu
>
> Adrian
>

Re: Feature request for RdfViewable

[Adrian Gschwend <ml...@netlabs.org>]

On 19.02.13 15:01, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote:

Hi Reto,

> Am I right that  http://vocab.netlabs.org/recipe#ingredient_domain
> points to the property that should be expanded? In the simplest case
> this would be an equilvalent to the query-param xPropObj. What we
> would also need is the inverse, i.e. an equivalent to xProSubj. In
> your example you might also want to expand the resource which has an
> eg:employ property pointing to you.

Good point, in the foaf:knows case this could be the people which
foaf:know the foaf:Person I care about one could expand them too.

I'm actually not supper happy with the terms I've choosen back then,
maybe it's time to change that. What about ingredientProperty and
ingredientInverseProperty?

cu

Adrian

Re: Feature request for RdfViewable

[Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>]

Hi Adrian!

I saw your issue. Indeed I think this would be a nice feature. The client
shouldn't be bothered with having to pass query parameters to get the
expansion they need.

I looked at your ontology. It looks like an interesting starting point.

Am I right that  http://vocab.netlabs.org/recipe#ingredient_domain points
to the property that should be expanded? In the simplest case this would be
an equilvalent to the query-param xPropObj. What we would also need is the
inverse, i.e. an equivalent to xProSubj. In your example you might also
want to expand the resource which has an eg:employ property pointing to
you.

Cheers,
Reto




On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Adrian Gschwend <ml...@netlabs.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I raised a new issue:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-946
>
> Currently RDF representations are quite static and I can't influence
> much, this could be easily configured in RDF as well IMHO.
>
> As an example if I have a foaf:Person I would like to be able to expand
> on all foaf:knows of that foaf:Person.
>
>
> cu
>
> Adrian
>