You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openmeetings.apache.org by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com> on 2012/06/26 11:55:07 UTC
[VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Hi,
that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that far)
There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
Results:
PPMC:
aaf +1 (mentor)
solomax +1
eschwert +1
alvaro +1
Wider Community: 3 times +3
Result Vote Thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9MMjmZCbKKQ9ud64i4OPV2FJ9h6daqoS5q9%3DxOZVad_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
The Vote Thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9Xo7B13C14Uqq8VF%3DTCh3C7PNX6%2BQ4YJvO0cDej0e9vA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Main changes are covered in the Readme:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/README
Full Changelog:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/CHANGELOG
Release artefacts:
http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc2/
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/
PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Best regards.
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.openmeetings.de
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
I am closing the vote. Vote is not passed.
Two times requests to change the LICENSE and NOTICE file.
Source files should be provided as ZIP too.
No positive votes but also no further negative feedback.
Sebastian
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.openmeetings.de
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
@sebb About the duplicated JARs in our binary packages:
Those JARs are different from the JARs in WEB-INF/lib or Server's lib.
Those JARs are signed by a certificate and used by a Java Web-Start
application. This Web-Start application is the Screensharing/Recording
client during conference sessions in OpenMeetings.
That is why those JARs are duplicated in different folders.
I don't think we will change anything about that, the signed JARs for the
client and the Web-Applications JARs should stay in different folders.
There might be a way to virtually make the JARs from the server's lib
folder available for the Web-Start application but I don't think mixing
those JARs will have a good effect on how easy it is for 3th party to
understand which JARs are necessary for the Web-Start client.
End users might for example use their own certificate to sign those JARs to
get rid of WebStarts warning box. If we obfuscate the path to the JARs by
mixing them there will be no additional value for the end user.
Sebastian
2012/6/26 sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> On 26 June 2012 14:46, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 26, 2012, at 9:40 AM, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 26 June 2012 13:28, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> Thanks for the feedback and review so far!
> >>>
> >>> About correct attribution of ASF JARs
> >>> Do they need a reference in the LICENSE file at all ?
> >>
> >> The recipient of the package needs to be able to quickly find the
> >> license associated with all jars, so I would say yes.
> >>
> >>> Must the name of the JAR file be _exactly_ mentioned in the LICENSE
> file?
> >>> For example:
> >>>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/LICENSE?view=markup
> >>> Line: 206
> >>> "For GlassFish components / activation.jar"
> >>> => Do we need to write "activation-jar-1.1.jar" instead of
> "activation.jar"
> >>> ?
> >>
> >> Yes, because licenses may change between versions.
> >
> > I've seen 'activation-jar-x.x.jar' used to good effect. In either case,
> the key would be that the license must be validated when the version is
> changed and when the release is being generated/reviewed. As long as that
> occurs an explicit name or a suitably descriptive name would be sufficient…
>
> If the license is not tied to the specific jar version in the LICENSE
> file, then this info will have to be held elsewhere to ensure that
> version changes can be properly validated by the committers. Keeping
> the version in the LICENSE file is very simple, and is helpful both to
> the end-user and the reviewer.
>
> > --kevan
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.openmeetings.de
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 26 June 2012 14:46, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 26, 2012, at 9:40 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 26 June 2012 13:28, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks for the feedback and review so far!
>>>
>>> About correct attribution of ASF JARs
>>> Do they need a reference in the LICENSE file at all ?
>>
>> The recipient of the package needs to be able to quickly find the
>> license associated with all jars, so I would say yes.
>>
>>> Must the name of the JAR file be _exactly_ mentioned in the LICENSE file?
>>> For example:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/LICENSE?view=markup
>>> Line: 206
>>> "For GlassFish components / activation.jar"
>>> => Do we need to write "activation-jar-1.1.jar" instead of "activation.jar"
>>> ?
>>
>> Yes, because licenses may change between versions.
>
> I've seen 'activation-jar-x.x.jar' used to good effect. In either case, the key would be that the license must be validated when the version is changed and when the release is being generated/reviewed. As long as that occurs an explicit name or a suitably descriptive name would be sufficient…
If the license is not tied to the specific jar version in the LICENSE
file, then this info will have to be held elsewhere to ensure that
version changes can be properly validated by the committers. Keeping
the version in the LICENSE file is very simple, and is helpful both to
the end-user and the reviewer.
> --kevan
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Jun 26, 2012, at 9:40 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 26 June 2012 13:28, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for the feedback and review so far!
>>
>> About correct attribution of ASF JARs
>> Do they need a reference in the LICENSE file at all ?
>
> The recipient of the package needs to be able to quickly find the
> license associated with all jars, so I would say yes.
>
>> Must the name of the JAR file be _exactly_ mentioned in the LICENSE file?
>> For example:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/LICENSE?view=markup
>> Line: 206
>> "For GlassFish components / activation.jar"
>> => Do we need to write "activation-jar-1.1.jar" instead of "activation.jar"
>> ?
>
> Yes, because licenses may change between versions.
I've seen 'activation-jar-x.x.jar' used to good effect. In either case, the key would be that the license must be validated when the version is changed and when the release is being generated/reviewed. As long as that occurs an explicit name or a suitably descriptive name would be sufficient…
--kevan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 26 June 2012 13:28, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback and review so far!
>
> About correct attribution of ASF JARs
> Do they need a reference in the LICENSE file at all ?
The recipient of the package needs to be able to quickly find the
license associated with all jars, so I would say yes.
> Must the name of the JAR file be _exactly_ mentioned in the LICENSE file?
> For example:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/LICENSE?view=markup
> Line: 206
> "For GlassFish components / activation.jar"
> => Do we need to write "activation-jar-1.1.jar" instead of "activation.jar"
> ?
Yes, because licenses may change between versions.
> or Line 327 instead of "For SLF4J:" "slf4j-api-1.6.4.jar"
>
> Thanks,
> Sebastian
>
> 2012/6/26 sebb <se...@gmail.com>
>
>> On 26 June 2012 12:43, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > @Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
>>
>> bcprov
>> commons-beanutils
>> commons-codec
>> commons-collections
>> ehcache-core
>> httpclient
>> httpcore
>>
>> etc.
>>
>> Not as many as I thought at first glance, but still quite a lot.
>>
>> > About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from
>> >
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
>> >
>> >
>> > "The NOTICE document is for additional copyright and attribution
>> statements
>> > those licenses may require."
>> > => As all libraries that are shipped are compliant to the Apache License
>> I
>> > would have expected that it is sufficient to only add a section to the
>> > Notice file where the License requires additionall attribution.
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> > All 3th party licenses are in the License file.
>>
>> This is impossible to check at present, because the file does not list
>> all the jars it references.
>>
>> The only jar references I could find in the LICENSE file are:
>>
>> For GlassFish components / activation.jar
>> For backport-util-concurrent-jar-3.1.jar
>> For jaxb-api-jar-2.2.4.jar
>> For jaxen-jar-1.1.1.jar
>> For mail-jar-1.4.4.jar
>> For wsdl4j-jar-1.6.2.jar
>> For jython-2.5.jar
>> dom4j-1.6.1.jar
>> postgresql-jar-9.1-901.jdbc4.jar
>> serp-1.13.1.jar - BSD License
>>
>> Yet the following jars are included:
>>
>> activation-jar-1.1.jar
>> backport-util-concurrent-jar-3.1.jar
>> bcprov-jdk16-145.jar
>> boot.jar
>> cglib-jar-2.2.2.jar
>> com.springsource.javax.xml.stream-1.0.1.jar
>> com.springsource.net.sf.cglib-2.2.0.jar
>> com.springsource.org.antlr-3.1.3.jar
>> com.springsource.org.aopalliance-1.0.0.jar
>> com.springsource.org.apache.xerces-2.9.1.jar
>> com.springsource.org.codehaus.groovy-1.7.0.jar
>> com.springsource.org.mozilla.javascript-1.7.0.R2.jar
>> com.springsource.org.objectweb.asm-3.2.0.jar
>> com.springsource.org.objectweb.asm.commons-3.2.0.jar
>> dom4j-jar-1.6.1.jar
>> ehcache-core-2.5.0.jar
>> ical4j-bundle-1.0.3.jar
>> jasper-6.0.32.jar
>> jasper-el-6.0.32.jar
>> jasper-jdt-6.0.29.jar
>> javaee-api-5.1.2.om.jar
>> jaxb-api-jar-2.2.4.jar
>> jaxb-impl-jar-2.2.4.jar
>> jaxb-xjc-jar-2.2.4.jar
>> jaxws-tools-jar-2.2.5.jar
>> jcl-over-slf4j-1.6.4.jar
>> jruby-1.6.7.2.jar
>> jsr311-api-jar-1.1.1.jar
>> jul-to-slf4j-1.6.4.jar
>> jython-standalone-2.5.2.jar
>> logback-classic-1.0.3.jar
>> logback-core-1.0.3.jar
>> mail-jar-1.4.4.jar
>> neethi-bundle-3.0.3-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> org.springframework.aspects-jar-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
>> org.springframework.jdbc-jar-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
>> org.springframework.orm-jar-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
>> org.springframework.transaction-jar-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
>> org.springframework.web.servlet-jar-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
>> postgresql-jar-9.1-901.jdbc4.jar
>> quartz-1.8.5.jar
>> red5-client.jar
>> red5.jar
>> serp-jar-1.13.1.jar
>> servlet-api-jar-2.5.jar
>> slf4j-api-1.6.4.jar
>> spring-aop-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
>> spring-asm-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
>> spring-beans-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
>> spring-context-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
>> spring-context-support-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
>> spring-core-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
>> spring-expression-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
>> spring-web-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
>> stax-api-jar-1.0-2.jar
>> stax2-api-jar-3.1.1.jar
>> sysout-over-slf4j-1.0.2.jar
>> tomcatplugin-1.3.jar
>> woden-api-jar-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> woden-impl-commons-jar-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> woden-impl-dom-jar-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> woodstox-core-asl-jar-4.1.3.jar
>> wsdl4j-jar-1.6.2.jar
>> XmlSchema-bundle-1.4.8-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> xpp3-jar-1.1.4c.jar
>> xstream-jar-1.4.2.jar
>>
>> Plus the following ASF jars:
>>
>> apache-mime4j-core-jar-0.8-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> axiom-api-bundle-1.2.14-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> axiom-dom-bundle-1.2.14-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> axiom-impl-bundle-1.2.14-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> axis2-jar-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> axis2-jaxws-jar-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> axis2-kernel-jar-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> axis2-metadata-jar-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> axis2-saaj-jar-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> axis2-transport-http-bundle-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> axis2-transport-local-bundle-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> batik-anim-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-awt-util-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-bridge-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-codec-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-css-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-dom-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-ext-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-extension-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-gui-util-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-gvt-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-parser-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-rasterizer-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-script-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-slideshow-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-squiggle-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-svg-dom-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-svggen-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-svgpp-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-swing-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-transcoder-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-ttf2svg-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-util-jar-1.7.jar
>> batik-xml-jar-1.7.jar
>> catalina-6.0.32.jar
>> commons-beanutils-1.8.3.jar
>> commons-cli-jar-1.2.jar
>> commons-codec-1.6.jar
>> commons-codec-jar-1.6.jar
>> commons-collections-3.2.1.jar
>> commons-dbcp-jar-1.4.jar
>> commons-digester-jar-2.1.jar
>> commons-fileupload-jar-1.2.2.jar
>> commons-fileupload-jar-1.2.jar
>> commons-httpclient-jar-3.1.jar
>> commons-io-jar-1.4.jar
>> commons-io-jar-2.1.jar
>> commons-lang-jar-2.6.jar
>> commons-lang3-3.1.jar
>> commons-modeler-2.0.1.jar
>> commons-pool-1.5.6.jar
>> commons-transaction-jar-1.2.jar
>> derby-jar-10.8.2.2.jar
>> derbyclient-jar-10.8.2.2.jar
>> fop-jar-1.0.jar
>> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-jar-1.0.2.jar
>> geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-jar-1.1.jar
>> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-bundle-1.6.jar
>> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-bundle-1.0.jar
>> geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-bundle-1.1.jar
>> geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-jar-1.1.jar
>> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-jar-1.0.1.jar
>> geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-bundle-1.0.1.jar
>> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-jar-1.1.2.jar
>> httpclient-4.1.2.jar
>> httpclient-jar-4.2.jar
>> httpcore-4.1.3.jar
>> jaxen-jar-1.1.1.jar
>> log4j-over-slf4j-1.6.4.jar
>> mina-core-2.0.4.jar
>> mina-integration-beans-2.0.4.jar
>> mina-integration-jmx-2.0.4.jar
>> openjpa-bundle-2.2.0.jar
>> openmeetings-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> openmeetings-screenshare-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> openmeetings-templates-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> openmeetings-WebService-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
>> tomcat-coyote-6.0.32.jar
>> tomcat-juli-slf4j-1.5.0.jar
>> velocity-jar-1.7.jar
>> velocity-tools-jar-2.0.jar
>> ws-commons-util-jar-1.0.2.jar
>> xalan-jar-2.7.0.jar
>> xml-apis-ext-jar-1.3.04.jar
>> xml-resolver-jar-1.2.jar
>> xmlgraphics-commons-jar-1.4.jar
>> xmlrpc-2.0.1.jar
>> xmlrpc-client-jar-3.1.3.jar
>> xmlrpc-common-jar-3.1.3.jar
>>
>> [Some of the first list of jars may be ASF, I did not check them all]
>>
>> Which jars are part of Glassfish?
>>
>> > I don't see any requirements for duplicating the same in the Notice file.
>>
>> Only required notices need to go in the license file.
>>
>> > Sebastian
>> >
>> > 2012/6/26 sebb <se...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> >> On 26 June 2012 10:55, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
>> >> > negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that
>> far)
>> >> >
>> >> > There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
>> >> > Results:
>> >> > PPMC:
>> >> > aaf +1 (mentor)
>> >> > solomax +1
>> >> > eschwert +1
>> >> > alvaro +1
>> >> >
>> >> > Wider Community: 3 times +3
>> >> >
>> >> > Result Vote Thread:
>> >> >
>> >>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9MMjmZCbKKQ9ud64i4OPV2FJ9h6daqoS5q9%3DxOZVad_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>> >> >
>> >> > The Vote Thread:
>> >> >
>> >>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9Xo7B13C14Uqq8VF%3DTCh3C7PNX6%2BQ4YJvO0cDej0e9vA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>> >> >
>> >> > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
>> >> >
>> >>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/README
>> >> >
>> >> > Full Changelog:
>> >> >
>> >>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/CHANGELOG
>> >> >
>> >> > Release artefacts:
>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc2/
>> >>
>> >> The ASF releases source.
>> >> Why is there no Zip archive of the source?
>> >> There a zip and tar archives for the binary builds.
>> >>
>> >> The binary build includes a lot of 3rd party jars (about 80?, most of
>> >> them duplicated).
>> >> It's not clear if all the licenses for the included jars are included
>> >> in the LICENSE file.
>> >> I would expect some of them to require mention in the NOTICE file.
>> >>
>> >> The N&L files included in SVN, source and binary archives must relate
>> >> only to the content which is actually included.
>> >> This generally means different N&L files for the binary archives
>> >> (unless the binary is created only from the source).
>> >>
>> >> The NOTICE files must only have *required* notices.
>> >>
>> >> > Tag:
>> >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/
>> >>
>> >> The NOTICE file looks wrong; it should not include the full licence
>> >> for iCal4j which should be in the appropriate LICENSE file.
>> >> The NOTICE file is for required notices only.
>> >>
>> >> As far as I can tell, only the FamFamFam icons are included in the
>> >> source release (and SVN) so the corresponding N&L files should only
>> >> refer to them.
>> >>
>> >> > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
>> >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
>> >> >
>> >> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >> >
>> >> > [ ] +1 approve
>> >> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> >> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> >> >
>> >> > Best regards.
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Sebastian Wagner
>> >> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> >> > http://www.openmeetings.de
>> >> > http://www.webbase-design.de
>> >> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> >> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sebastian Wagner
>> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> > http://www.openmeetings.de
>> > http://www.webbase-design.de
>> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.openmeetings.de
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the feedback and review so far!
About correct attribution of ASF JARs
Do they need a reference in the LICENSE file at all ?
Must the name of the JAR file be _exactly_ mentioned in the LICENSE file?
For example:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/LICENSE?view=markup
Line: 206
"For GlassFish components / activation.jar"
=> Do we need to write "activation-jar-1.1.jar" instead of "activation.jar"
?
or Line 327 instead of "For SLF4J:" "slf4j-api-1.6.4.jar"
Thanks,
Sebastian
2012/6/26 sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> On 26 June 2012 12:43, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > @Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
>
> bcprov
> commons-beanutils
> commons-codec
> commons-collections
> ehcache-core
> httpclient
> httpcore
>
> etc.
>
> Not as many as I thought at first glance, but still quite a lot.
>
> > About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
> >
> >
> > "The NOTICE document is for additional copyright and attribution
> statements
> > those licenses may require."
> > => As all libraries that are shipped are compliant to the Apache License
> I
> > would have expected that it is sufficient to only add a section to the
> > Notice file where the License requires additionall attribution.
>
> Yes.
>
> > All 3th party licenses are in the License file.
>
> This is impossible to check at present, because the file does not list
> all the jars it references.
>
> The only jar references I could find in the LICENSE file are:
>
> For GlassFish components / activation.jar
> For backport-util-concurrent-jar-3.1.jar
> For jaxb-api-jar-2.2.4.jar
> For jaxen-jar-1.1.1.jar
> For mail-jar-1.4.4.jar
> For wsdl4j-jar-1.6.2.jar
> For jython-2.5.jar
> dom4j-1.6.1.jar
> postgresql-jar-9.1-901.jdbc4.jar
> serp-1.13.1.jar - BSD License
>
> Yet the following jars are included:
>
> activation-jar-1.1.jar
> backport-util-concurrent-jar-3.1.jar
> bcprov-jdk16-145.jar
> boot.jar
> cglib-jar-2.2.2.jar
> com.springsource.javax.xml.stream-1.0.1.jar
> com.springsource.net.sf.cglib-2.2.0.jar
> com.springsource.org.antlr-3.1.3.jar
> com.springsource.org.aopalliance-1.0.0.jar
> com.springsource.org.apache.xerces-2.9.1.jar
> com.springsource.org.codehaus.groovy-1.7.0.jar
> com.springsource.org.mozilla.javascript-1.7.0.R2.jar
> com.springsource.org.objectweb.asm-3.2.0.jar
> com.springsource.org.objectweb.asm.commons-3.2.0.jar
> dom4j-jar-1.6.1.jar
> ehcache-core-2.5.0.jar
> ical4j-bundle-1.0.3.jar
> jasper-6.0.32.jar
> jasper-el-6.0.32.jar
> jasper-jdt-6.0.29.jar
> javaee-api-5.1.2.om.jar
> jaxb-api-jar-2.2.4.jar
> jaxb-impl-jar-2.2.4.jar
> jaxb-xjc-jar-2.2.4.jar
> jaxws-tools-jar-2.2.5.jar
> jcl-over-slf4j-1.6.4.jar
> jruby-1.6.7.2.jar
> jsr311-api-jar-1.1.1.jar
> jul-to-slf4j-1.6.4.jar
> jython-standalone-2.5.2.jar
> logback-classic-1.0.3.jar
> logback-core-1.0.3.jar
> mail-jar-1.4.4.jar
> neethi-bundle-3.0.3-SNAPSHOT.jar
> org.springframework.aspects-jar-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
> org.springframework.jdbc-jar-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
> org.springframework.orm-jar-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
> org.springframework.transaction-jar-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
> org.springframework.web.servlet-jar-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
> postgresql-jar-9.1-901.jdbc4.jar
> quartz-1.8.5.jar
> red5-client.jar
> red5.jar
> serp-jar-1.13.1.jar
> servlet-api-jar-2.5.jar
> slf4j-api-1.6.4.jar
> spring-aop-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
> spring-asm-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
> spring-beans-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
> spring-context-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
> spring-context-support-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
> spring-core-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
> spring-expression-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
> spring-web-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
> stax-api-jar-1.0-2.jar
> stax2-api-jar-3.1.1.jar
> sysout-over-slf4j-1.0.2.jar
> tomcatplugin-1.3.jar
> woden-api-jar-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> woden-impl-commons-jar-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> woden-impl-dom-jar-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> woodstox-core-asl-jar-4.1.3.jar
> wsdl4j-jar-1.6.2.jar
> XmlSchema-bundle-1.4.8-SNAPSHOT.jar
> xpp3-jar-1.1.4c.jar
> xstream-jar-1.4.2.jar
>
> Plus the following ASF jars:
>
> apache-mime4j-core-jar-0.8-SNAPSHOT.jar
> axiom-api-bundle-1.2.14-SNAPSHOT.jar
> axiom-dom-bundle-1.2.14-SNAPSHOT.jar
> axiom-impl-bundle-1.2.14-SNAPSHOT.jar
> axis2-jar-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> axis2-jaxws-jar-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> axis2-kernel-jar-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> axis2-metadata-jar-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> axis2-saaj-jar-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> axis2-transport-http-bundle-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> axis2-transport-local-bundle-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> batik-anim-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-awt-util-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-bridge-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-codec-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-css-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-dom-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-ext-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-extension-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-gui-util-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-gvt-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-parser-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-rasterizer-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-script-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-slideshow-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-squiggle-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-svg-dom-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-svggen-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-svgpp-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-swing-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-transcoder-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-ttf2svg-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-util-jar-1.7.jar
> batik-xml-jar-1.7.jar
> catalina-6.0.32.jar
> commons-beanutils-1.8.3.jar
> commons-cli-jar-1.2.jar
> commons-codec-1.6.jar
> commons-codec-jar-1.6.jar
> commons-collections-3.2.1.jar
> commons-dbcp-jar-1.4.jar
> commons-digester-jar-2.1.jar
> commons-fileupload-jar-1.2.2.jar
> commons-fileupload-jar-1.2.jar
> commons-httpclient-jar-3.1.jar
> commons-io-jar-1.4.jar
> commons-io-jar-2.1.jar
> commons-lang-jar-2.6.jar
> commons-lang3-3.1.jar
> commons-modeler-2.0.1.jar
> commons-pool-1.5.6.jar
> commons-transaction-jar-1.2.jar
> derby-jar-10.8.2.2.jar
> derbyclient-jar-10.8.2.2.jar
> fop-jar-1.0.jar
> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-jar-1.0.2.jar
> geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-jar-1.1.jar
> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-bundle-1.6.jar
> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-bundle-1.0.jar
> geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-bundle-1.1.jar
> geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-jar-1.1.jar
> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-jar-1.0.1.jar
> geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-bundle-1.0.1.jar
> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-jar-1.1.2.jar
> httpclient-4.1.2.jar
> httpclient-jar-4.2.jar
> httpcore-4.1.3.jar
> jaxen-jar-1.1.1.jar
> log4j-over-slf4j-1.6.4.jar
> mina-core-2.0.4.jar
> mina-integration-beans-2.0.4.jar
> mina-integration-jmx-2.0.4.jar
> openjpa-bundle-2.2.0.jar
> openmeetings-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> openmeetings-screenshare-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> openmeetings-templates-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> openmeetings-WebService-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> tomcat-coyote-6.0.32.jar
> tomcat-juli-slf4j-1.5.0.jar
> velocity-jar-1.7.jar
> velocity-tools-jar-2.0.jar
> ws-commons-util-jar-1.0.2.jar
> xalan-jar-2.7.0.jar
> xml-apis-ext-jar-1.3.04.jar
> xml-resolver-jar-1.2.jar
> xmlgraphics-commons-jar-1.4.jar
> xmlrpc-2.0.1.jar
> xmlrpc-client-jar-3.1.3.jar
> xmlrpc-common-jar-3.1.3.jar
>
> [Some of the first list of jars may be ASF, I did not check them all]
>
> Which jars are part of Glassfish?
>
> > I don't see any requirements for duplicating the same in the Notice file.
>
> Only required notices need to go in the license file.
>
> > Sebastian
> >
> > 2012/6/26 sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> On 26 June 2012 10:55, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
> >> > negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that
> far)
> >> >
> >> > There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
> >> > Results:
> >> > PPMC:
> >> > aaf +1 (mentor)
> >> > solomax +1
> >> > eschwert +1
> >> > alvaro +1
> >> >
> >> > Wider Community: 3 times +3
> >> >
> >> > Result Vote Thread:
> >> >
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9MMjmZCbKKQ9ud64i4OPV2FJ9h6daqoS5q9%3DxOZVad_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >> >
> >> > The Vote Thread:
> >> >
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9Xo7B13C14Uqq8VF%3DTCh3C7PNX6%2BQ4YJvO0cDej0e9vA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >> >
> >> > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> >> >
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/README
> >> >
> >> > Full Changelog:
> >> >
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/CHANGELOG
> >> >
> >> > Release artefacts:
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc2/
> >>
> >> The ASF releases source.
> >> Why is there no Zip archive of the source?
> >> There a zip and tar archives for the binary builds.
> >>
> >> The binary build includes a lot of 3rd party jars (about 80?, most of
> >> them duplicated).
> >> It's not clear if all the licenses for the included jars are included
> >> in the LICENSE file.
> >> I would expect some of them to require mention in the NOTICE file.
> >>
> >> The N&L files included in SVN, source and binary archives must relate
> >> only to the content which is actually included.
> >> This generally means different N&L files for the binary archives
> >> (unless the binary is created only from the source).
> >>
> >> The NOTICE files must only have *required* notices.
> >>
> >> > Tag:
> >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/
> >>
> >> The NOTICE file looks wrong; it should not include the full licence
> >> for iCal4j which should be in the appropriate LICENSE file.
> >> The NOTICE file is for required notices only.
> >>
> >> As far as I can tell, only the FamFamFam icons are included in the
> >> source release (and SVN) so the corresponding N&L files should only
> >> refer to them.
> >>
> >> > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
> >> >
> >> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 approve
> >> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >> >
> >> > Best regards.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Sebastian Wagner
> >> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> >> > http://www.openmeetings.de
> >> > http://www.webbase-design.de
> >> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> >> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Wagner
> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > http://www.openmeetings.de
> > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.openmeetings.de
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 26 June 2012 12:43, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
bcprov
commons-beanutils
commons-codec
commons-collections
ehcache-core
httpclient
httpcore
etc.
Not as many as I thought at first glance, but still quite a lot.
> About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
>
>
> "The NOTICE document is for additional copyright and attribution statements
> those licenses may require."
> => As all libraries that are shipped are compliant to the Apache License I
> would have expected that it is sufficient to only add a section to the
> Notice file where the License requires additionall attribution.
Yes.
> All 3th party licenses are in the License file.
This is impossible to check at present, because the file does not list
all the jars it references.
The only jar references I could find in the LICENSE file are:
For GlassFish components / activation.jar
For backport-util-concurrent-jar-3.1.jar
For jaxb-api-jar-2.2.4.jar
For jaxen-jar-1.1.1.jar
For mail-jar-1.4.4.jar
For wsdl4j-jar-1.6.2.jar
For jython-2.5.jar
dom4j-1.6.1.jar
postgresql-jar-9.1-901.jdbc4.jar
serp-1.13.1.jar - BSD License
Yet the following jars are included:
activation-jar-1.1.jar
backport-util-concurrent-jar-3.1.jar
bcprov-jdk16-145.jar
boot.jar
cglib-jar-2.2.2.jar
com.springsource.javax.xml.stream-1.0.1.jar
com.springsource.net.sf.cglib-2.2.0.jar
com.springsource.org.antlr-3.1.3.jar
com.springsource.org.aopalliance-1.0.0.jar
com.springsource.org.apache.xerces-2.9.1.jar
com.springsource.org.codehaus.groovy-1.7.0.jar
com.springsource.org.mozilla.javascript-1.7.0.R2.jar
com.springsource.org.objectweb.asm-3.2.0.jar
com.springsource.org.objectweb.asm.commons-3.2.0.jar
dom4j-jar-1.6.1.jar
ehcache-core-2.5.0.jar
ical4j-bundle-1.0.3.jar
jasper-6.0.32.jar
jasper-el-6.0.32.jar
jasper-jdt-6.0.29.jar
javaee-api-5.1.2.om.jar
jaxb-api-jar-2.2.4.jar
jaxb-impl-jar-2.2.4.jar
jaxb-xjc-jar-2.2.4.jar
jaxws-tools-jar-2.2.5.jar
jcl-over-slf4j-1.6.4.jar
jruby-1.6.7.2.jar
jsr311-api-jar-1.1.1.jar
jul-to-slf4j-1.6.4.jar
jython-standalone-2.5.2.jar
logback-classic-1.0.3.jar
logback-core-1.0.3.jar
mail-jar-1.4.4.jar
neethi-bundle-3.0.3-SNAPSHOT.jar
org.springframework.aspects-jar-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
org.springframework.jdbc-jar-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
org.springframework.orm-jar-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
org.springframework.transaction-jar-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
org.springframework.web.servlet-jar-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
postgresql-jar-9.1-901.jdbc4.jar
quartz-1.8.5.jar
red5-client.jar
red5.jar
serp-jar-1.13.1.jar
servlet-api-jar-2.5.jar
slf4j-api-1.6.4.jar
spring-aop-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
spring-asm-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
spring-beans-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
spring-context-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
spring-context-support-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
spring-core-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
spring-expression-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
spring-web-3.1.1.RELEASE.jar
stax-api-jar-1.0-2.jar
stax2-api-jar-3.1.1.jar
sysout-over-slf4j-1.0.2.jar
tomcatplugin-1.3.jar
woden-api-jar-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
woden-impl-commons-jar-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
woden-impl-dom-jar-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
woodstox-core-asl-jar-4.1.3.jar
wsdl4j-jar-1.6.2.jar
XmlSchema-bundle-1.4.8-SNAPSHOT.jar
xpp3-jar-1.1.4c.jar
xstream-jar-1.4.2.jar
Plus the following ASF jars:
apache-mime4j-core-jar-0.8-SNAPSHOT.jar
axiom-api-bundle-1.2.14-SNAPSHOT.jar
axiom-dom-bundle-1.2.14-SNAPSHOT.jar
axiom-impl-bundle-1.2.14-SNAPSHOT.jar
axis2-jar-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
axis2-jaxws-jar-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
axis2-kernel-jar-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
axis2-metadata-jar-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
axis2-saaj-jar-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
axis2-transport-http-bundle-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
axis2-transport-local-bundle-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
batik-anim-jar-1.7.jar
batik-awt-util-jar-1.7.jar
batik-bridge-jar-1.7.jar
batik-codec-jar-1.7.jar
batik-css-jar-1.7.jar
batik-dom-jar-1.7.jar
batik-ext-jar-1.7.jar
batik-extension-jar-1.7.jar
batik-gui-util-jar-1.7.jar
batik-gvt-jar-1.7.jar
batik-parser-jar-1.7.jar
batik-rasterizer-jar-1.7.jar
batik-script-jar-1.7.jar
batik-slideshow-jar-1.7.jar
batik-squiggle-jar-1.7.jar
batik-svg-dom-jar-1.7.jar
batik-svggen-jar-1.7.jar
batik-svgpp-jar-1.7.jar
batik-swing-jar-1.7.jar
batik-transcoder-jar-1.7.jar
batik-ttf2svg-jar-1.7.jar
batik-util-jar-1.7.jar
batik-xml-jar-1.7.jar
catalina-6.0.32.jar
commons-beanutils-1.8.3.jar
commons-cli-jar-1.2.jar
commons-codec-1.6.jar
commons-codec-jar-1.6.jar
commons-collections-3.2.1.jar
commons-dbcp-jar-1.4.jar
commons-digester-jar-2.1.jar
commons-fileupload-jar-1.2.2.jar
commons-fileupload-jar-1.2.jar
commons-httpclient-jar-3.1.jar
commons-io-jar-1.4.jar
commons-io-jar-2.1.jar
commons-lang-jar-2.6.jar
commons-lang3-3.1.jar
commons-modeler-2.0.1.jar
commons-pool-1.5.6.jar
commons-transaction-jar-1.2.jar
derby-jar-10.8.2.2.jar
derbyclient-jar-10.8.2.2.jar
fop-jar-1.0.jar
geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-jar-1.0.2.jar
geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-jar-1.1.jar
geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-bundle-1.6.jar
geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-bundle-1.0.jar
geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-bundle-1.1.jar
geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-jar-1.1.jar
geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-jar-1.0.1.jar
geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-bundle-1.0.1.jar
geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-jar-1.1.2.jar
httpclient-4.1.2.jar
httpclient-jar-4.2.jar
httpcore-4.1.3.jar
jaxen-jar-1.1.1.jar
log4j-over-slf4j-1.6.4.jar
mina-core-2.0.4.jar
mina-integration-beans-2.0.4.jar
mina-integration-jmx-2.0.4.jar
openjpa-bundle-2.2.0.jar
openmeetings-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
openmeetings-screenshare-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
openmeetings-templates-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
openmeetings-WebService-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
tomcat-coyote-6.0.32.jar
tomcat-juli-slf4j-1.5.0.jar
velocity-jar-1.7.jar
velocity-tools-jar-2.0.jar
ws-commons-util-jar-1.0.2.jar
xalan-jar-2.7.0.jar
xml-apis-ext-jar-1.3.04.jar
xml-resolver-jar-1.2.jar
xmlgraphics-commons-jar-1.4.jar
xmlrpc-2.0.1.jar
xmlrpc-client-jar-3.1.3.jar
xmlrpc-common-jar-3.1.3.jar
[Some of the first list of jars may be ASF, I did not check them all]
Which jars are part of Glassfish?
> I don't see any requirements for duplicating the same in the Notice file.
Only required notices need to go in the license file.
> Sebastian
>
> 2012/6/26 sebb <se...@gmail.com>
>
>> On 26 June 2012 10:55, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
>> > negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that far)
>> >
>> > There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
>> > Results:
>> > PPMC:
>> > aaf +1 (mentor)
>> > solomax +1
>> > eschwert +1
>> > alvaro +1
>> >
>> > Wider Community: 3 times +3
>> >
>> > Result Vote Thread:
>> >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9MMjmZCbKKQ9ud64i4OPV2FJ9h6daqoS5q9%3DxOZVad_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>> >
>> > The Vote Thread:
>> >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9Xo7B13C14Uqq8VF%3DTCh3C7PNX6%2BQ4YJvO0cDej0e9vA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>> >
>> > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/README
>> >
>> > Full Changelog:
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/CHANGELOG
>> >
>> > Release artefacts:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc2/
>>
>> The ASF releases source.
>> Why is there no Zip archive of the source?
>> There a zip and tar archives for the binary builds.
>>
>> The binary build includes a lot of 3rd party jars (about 80?, most of
>> them duplicated).
>> It's not clear if all the licenses for the included jars are included
>> in the LICENSE file.
>> I would expect some of them to require mention in the NOTICE file.
>>
>> The N&L files included in SVN, source and binary archives must relate
>> only to the content which is actually included.
>> This generally means different N&L files for the binary archives
>> (unless the binary is created only from the source).
>>
>> The NOTICE files must only have *required* notices.
>>
>> > Tag:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/
>>
>> The NOTICE file looks wrong; it should not include the full licence
>> for iCal4j which should be in the appropriate LICENSE file.
>> The NOTICE file is for required notices only.
>>
>> As far as I can tell, only the FamFamFam icons are included in the
>> source release (and SVN) so the corresponding N&L files should only
>> refer to them.
>>
>> > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
>> >
>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 approve
>> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> >
>> > Best regards.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sebastian Wagner
>> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> > http://www.openmeetings.de
>> > http://www.webbase-design.de
>> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.openmeetings.de
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Screen sharing logs are reduced: revision 1355299
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I guess we should fix at least screensharing client prior to making new
> TAG.
> I'll wait.
> Please let me know we anything else need to be done before creating new RC.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 4:39 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
> seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Release Candidate 2 won't be released because the Vote was negative on the
>> general list at Apache Foundation.
>>
>> You could create a TAG RC3 and commit your big changes to trunk then.
>>
>> Sebastian
>>
>> 2012/6/29 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>>
>> > Are we going to release this version?
>> > Can I commit my huge changes?
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:43 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
>> > seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > @Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
>> > >
>> > > About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > "The NOTICE document is for additional copyright and attribution
>> > statements
>> > > those licenses may require."
>> > > => As all libraries that are shipped are compliant to the Apache
>> License
>> > I
>> > > would have expected that it is sufficient to only add a section to the
>> > > Notice file where the License requires additionall attribution.
>> > > All 3th party licenses are in the License file.
>> > > I don't see any requirements for duplicating the same in the Notice
>> file.
>> > >
>> > > Sebastian
>> > >
>> > > 2012/6/26 sebb <se...@gmail.com>
>> > >
>> > > > On 26 June 2012 10:55, seba.wagner@gmail.com <seba.wagner@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was
>> voted
>> > > > > negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came
>> that
>> > > far)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
>> > > > > Results:
>> > > > > PPMC:
>> > > > > aaf +1 (mentor)
>> > > > > solomax +1
>> > > > > eschwert +1
>> > > > > alvaro +1
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Wider Community: 3 times +3
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Result Vote Thread:
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9MMjmZCbKKQ9ud64i4OPV2FJ9h6daqoS5q9%3DxOZVad_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The Vote Thread:
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9Xo7B13C14Uqq8VF%3DTCh3C7PNX6%2BQ4YJvO0cDej0e9vA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/README
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Full Changelog:
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/CHANGELOG
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Release artefacts:
>> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc2/
>> > > >
>> > > > The ASF releases source.
>> > > > Why is there no Zip archive of the source?
>> > > > There a zip and tar archives for the binary builds.
>> > > >
>> > > > The binary build includes a lot of 3rd party jars (about 80?, most
>> of
>> > > > them duplicated).
>> > > > It's not clear if all the licenses for the included jars are
>> included
>> > > > in the LICENSE file.
>> > > > I would expect some of them to require mention in the NOTICE file.
>> > > >
>> > > > The N&L files included in SVN, source and binary archives must
>> relate
>> > > > only to the content which is actually included.
>> > > > This generally means different N&L files for the binary archives
>> > > > (unless the binary is created only from the source).
>> > > >
>> > > > The NOTICE files must only have *required* notices.
>> > > >
>> > > > > Tag:
>> > > > >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/
>> > > >
>> > > > The NOTICE file looks wrong; it should not include the full licence
>> > > > for iCal4j which should be in the appropriate LICENSE file.
>> > > > The NOTICE file is for required notices only.
>> > > >
>> > > > As far as I can tell, only the FamFamFam icons are included in the
>> > > > source release (and SVN) so the corresponding N&L files should only
>> > > > refer to them.
>> > > >
>> > > > > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
>> > > > >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > [ ] +1 approve
>> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Best regards.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Sebastian Wagner
>> > > > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> > > > > http://www.openmeetings.de
>> > > > > http://www.webbase-design.de
>> > > > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> > > > > seba.wagner@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Sebastian Wagner
>> > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> > > http://www.openmeetings.de
>> > > http://www.webbase-design.de
>> > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> > > seba.wagner@gmail.com
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > WBR
>> > Maxim aka solomax
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sebastian Wagner
>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> http://www.openmeetings.de
>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
I guess we should fix at least screensharing client prior to making new TAG.
I'll wait.
Please let me know we anything else need to be done before creating new RC.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 4:39 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
> Release Candidate 2 won't be released because the Vote was negative on the
> general list at Apache Foundation.
>
> You could create a TAG RC3 and commit your big changes to trunk then.
>
> Sebastian
>
> 2012/6/29 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>
> > Are we going to release this version?
> > Can I commit my huge changes?
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:43 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
> > seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > @Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
> > >
> > > About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
> > >
> > >
> > > "The NOTICE document is for additional copyright and attribution
> > statements
> > > those licenses may require."
> > > => As all libraries that are shipped are compliant to the Apache
> License
> > I
> > > would have expected that it is sufficient to only add a section to the
> > > Notice file where the License requires additionall attribution.
> > > All 3th party licenses are in the License file.
> > > I don't see any requirements for duplicating the same in the Notice
> file.
> > >
> > > Sebastian
> > >
> > > 2012/6/26 sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > > On 26 June 2012 10:55, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
> > > > > negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that
> > > far)
> > > > >
> > > > > There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
> > > > > Results:
> > > > > PPMC:
> > > > > aaf +1 (mentor)
> > > > > solomax +1
> > > > > eschwert +1
> > > > > alvaro +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Wider Community: 3 times +3
> > > > >
> > > > > Result Vote Thread:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9MMjmZCbKKQ9ud64i4OPV2FJ9h6daqoS5q9%3DxOZVad_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > >
> > > > > The Vote Thread:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9Xo7B13C14Uqq8VF%3DTCh3C7PNX6%2BQ4YJvO0cDej0e9vA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > >
> > > > > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/README
> > > > >
> > > > > Full Changelog:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/CHANGELOG
> > > > >
> > > > > Release artefacts:
> > > > > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc2/
> > > >
> > > > The ASF releases source.
> > > > Why is there no Zip archive of the source?
> > > > There a zip and tar archives for the binary builds.
> > > >
> > > > The binary build includes a lot of 3rd party jars (about 80?, most of
> > > > them duplicated).
> > > > It's not clear if all the licenses for the included jars are included
> > > > in the LICENSE file.
> > > > I would expect some of them to require mention in the NOTICE file.
> > > >
> > > > The N&L files included in SVN, source and binary archives must relate
> > > > only to the content which is actually included.
> > > > This generally means different N&L files for the binary archives
> > > > (unless the binary is created only from the source).
> > > >
> > > > The NOTICE files must only have *required* notices.
> > > >
> > > > > Tag:
> > > > >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/
> > > >
> > > > The NOTICE file looks wrong; it should not include the full licence
> > > > for iCal4j which should be in the appropriate LICENSE file.
> > > > The NOTICE file is for required notices only.
> > > >
> > > > As far as I can tell, only the FamFamFam icons are included in the
> > > > source release (and SVN) so the corresponding N&L files should only
> > > > refer to them.
> > > >
> > > > > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> > > > >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Sebastian Wagner
> > > > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > > > > http://www.openmeetings.de
> > > > > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > > > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> > > > > seba.wagner@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sebastian Wagner
> > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > > http://www.openmeetings.de
> > > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> > > seba.wagner@gmail.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.openmeetings.de
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
Release Candidate 2 won't be released because the Vote was negative on the
general list at Apache Foundation.
You could create a TAG RC3 and commit your big changes to trunk then.
Sebastian
2012/6/29 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> Are we going to release this version?
> Can I commit my huge changes?
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:43 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
> seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > @Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
> >
> > About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from
> >
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
> >
> >
> > "The NOTICE document is for additional copyright and attribution
> statements
> > those licenses may require."
> > => As all libraries that are shipped are compliant to the Apache License
> I
> > would have expected that it is sufficient to only add a section to the
> > Notice file where the License requires additionall attribution.
> > All 3th party licenses are in the License file.
> > I don't see any requirements for duplicating the same in the Notice file.
> >
> > Sebastian
> >
> > 2012/6/26 sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > On 26 June 2012 10:55, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
> > > > negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that
> > far)
> > > >
> > > > There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
> > > > Results:
> > > > PPMC:
> > > > aaf +1 (mentor)
> > > > solomax +1
> > > > eschwert +1
> > > > alvaro +1
> > > >
> > > > Wider Community: 3 times +3
> > > >
> > > > Result Vote Thread:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9MMjmZCbKKQ9ud64i4OPV2FJ9h6daqoS5q9%3DxOZVad_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > >
> > > > The Vote Thread:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9Xo7B13C14Uqq8VF%3DTCh3C7PNX6%2BQ4YJvO0cDej0e9vA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > >
> > > > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/README
> > > >
> > > > Full Changelog:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/CHANGELOG
> > > >
> > > > Release artefacts:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc2/
> > >
> > > The ASF releases source.
> > > Why is there no Zip archive of the source?
> > > There a zip and tar archives for the binary builds.
> > >
> > > The binary build includes a lot of 3rd party jars (about 80?, most of
> > > them duplicated).
> > > It's not clear if all the licenses for the included jars are included
> > > in the LICENSE file.
> > > I would expect some of them to require mention in the NOTICE file.
> > >
> > > The N&L files included in SVN, source and binary archives must relate
> > > only to the content which is actually included.
> > > This generally means different N&L files for the binary archives
> > > (unless the binary is created only from the source).
> > >
> > > The NOTICE files must only have *required* notices.
> > >
> > > > Tag:
> > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/
> > >
> > > The NOTICE file looks wrong; it should not include the full licence
> > > for iCal4j which should be in the appropriate LICENSE file.
> > > The NOTICE file is for required notices only.
> > >
> > > As far as I can tell, only the FamFamFam icons are included in the
> > > source release (and SVN) so the corresponding N&L files should only
> > > refer to them.
> > >
> > > > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >
> > > > Best regards.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sebastian Wagner
> > > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > > > http://www.openmeetings.de
> > > > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> > > > seba.wagner@gmail.com
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Wagner
> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > http://www.openmeetings.de
> > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.openmeetings.de
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
Release Candidate 2 won't be released because the Vote was negative on the
general list at Apache Foundation.
You could create a TAG RC3 and commit your big changes to trunk then.
Sebastian
2012/6/29 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> Are we going to release this version?
> Can I commit my huge changes?
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:43 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
> seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > @Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
> >
> > About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from
> >
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
> >
> >
> > "The NOTICE document is for additional copyright and attribution
> statements
> > those licenses may require."
> > => As all libraries that are shipped are compliant to the Apache License
> I
> > would have expected that it is sufficient to only add a section to the
> > Notice file where the License requires additionall attribution.
> > All 3th party licenses are in the License file.
> > I don't see any requirements for duplicating the same in the Notice file.
> >
> > Sebastian
> >
> > 2012/6/26 sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > On 26 June 2012 10:55, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
> > > > negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that
> > far)
> > > >
> > > > There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
> > > > Results:
> > > > PPMC:
> > > > aaf +1 (mentor)
> > > > solomax +1
> > > > eschwert +1
> > > > alvaro +1
> > > >
> > > > Wider Community: 3 times +3
> > > >
> > > > Result Vote Thread:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9MMjmZCbKKQ9ud64i4OPV2FJ9h6daqoS5q9%3DxOZVad_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > >
> > > > The Vote Thread:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9Xo7B13C14Uqq8VF%3DTCh3C7PNX6%2BQ4YJvO0cDej0e9vA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > >
> > > > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/README
> > > >
> > > > Full Changelog:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/CHANGELOG
> > > >
> > > > Release artefacts:
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc2/
> > >
> > > The ASF releases source.
> > > Why is there no Zip archive of the source?
> > > There a zip and tar archives for the binary builds.
> > >
> > > The binary build includes a lot of 3rd party jars (about 80?, most of
> > > them duplicated).
> > > It's not clear if all the licenses for the included jars are included
> > > in the LICENSE file.
> > > I would expect some of them to require mention in the NOTICE file.
> > >
> > > The N&L files included in SVN, source and binary archives must relate
> > > only to the content which is actually included.
> > > This generally means different N&L files for the binary archives
> > > (unless the binary is created only from the source).
> > >
> > > The NOTICE files must only have *required* notices.
> > >
> > > > Tag:
> > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/
> > >
> > > The NOTICE file looks wrong; it should not include the full licence
> > > for iCal4j which should be in the appropriate LICENSE file.
> > > The NOTICE file is for required notices only.
> > >
> > > As far as I can tell, only the FamFamFam icons are included in the
> > > source release (and SVN) so the corresponding N&L files should only
> > > refer to them.
> > >
> > > > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >
> > > > Best regards.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sebastian Wagner
> > > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > > > http://www.openmeetings.de
> > > > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> > > > seba.wagner@gmail.com
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Wagner
> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > http://www.openmeetings.de
> > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.openmeetings.de
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Are we going to release this version?
Can I commit my huge changes?
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:43 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
>
> About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
>
>
> "The NOTICE document is for additional copyright and attribution statements
> those licenses may require."
> => As all libraries that are shipped are compliant to the Apache License I
> would have expected that it is sufficient to only add a section to the
> Notice file where the License requires additionall attribution.
> All 3th party licenses are in the License file.
> I don't see any requirements for duplicating the same in the Notice file.
>
> Sebastian
>
> 2012/6/26 sebb <se...@gmail.com>
>
> > On 26 June 2012 10:55, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
> > > negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that
> far)
> > >
> > > There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
> > > Results:
> > > PPMC:
> > > aaf +1 (mentor)
> > > solomax +1
> > > eschwert +1
> > > alvaro +1
> > >
> > > Wider Community: 3 times +3
> > >
> > > Result Vote Thread:
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9MMjmZCbKKQ9ud64i4OPV2FJ9h6daqoS5q9%3DxOZVad_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >
> > > The Vote Thread:
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9Xo7B13C14Uqq8VF%3DTCh3C7PNX6%2BQ4YJvO0cDej0e9vA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >
> > > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/README
> > >
> > > Full Changelog:
> > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/CHANGELOG
> > >
> > > Release artefacts:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc2/
> >
> > The ASF releases source.
> > Why is there no Zip archive of the source?
> > There a zip and tar archives for the binary builds.
> >
> > The binary build includes a lot of 3rd party jars (about 80?, most of
> > them duplicated).
> > It's not clear if all the licenses for the included jars are included
> > in the LICENSE file.
> > I would expect some of them to require mention in the NOTICE file.
> >
> > The N&L files included in SVN, source and binary archives must relate
> > only to the content which is actually included.
> > This generally means different N&L files for the binary archives
> > (unless the binary is created only from the source).
> >
> > The NOTICE files must only have *required* notices.
> >
> > > Tag:
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/
> >
> > The NOTICE file looks wrong; it should not include the full licence
> > for iCal4j which should be in the appropriate LICENSE file.
> > The NOTICE file is for required notices only.
> >
> > As far as I can tell, only the FamFamFam icons are included in the
> > source release (and SVN) so the corresponding N&L files should only
> > refer to them.
> >
> > > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
> > >
> > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > > Best regards.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sebastian Wagner
> > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > > http://www.openmeetings.de
> > > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> > > seba.wagner@gmail.com
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.openmeetings.de
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Jun 26, 2012, at 7:43 AM, seba.wagner@gmail.com wrote:
> @Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
>
> About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
>
>
> "The NOTICE document is for additional copyright and attribution statements
> those licenses may require."
> => As all libraries that are shipped are compliant to the Apache License I
> would have expected that it is sufficient to only add a section to the
> Notice file where the License requires additionall attribution.
> All 3th party licenses are in the License file.
> I don't see any requirements for duplicating the same in the Notice file.
If all of the 3rd party libraries were released by the ASF and their NOTICE files were only attributions to the ASF, you would be correct. However, if a 3rd party file was something like:
"Apache Foo
Copyright 2012 The Apache Software Foundation
This product includes software developed by
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
Portions of the Bar Component were orginally developed by the Baz Corporation."
You need to give the same attribution to the Baz Corporation.
If a 3rd party library was released under AL v2 but by an entity other than the ASF, you need to include the entire NOTICE.
One final note, if the NOTICE file contains attributions which do not apply to your redistribution (e.g. you don't include the Bar component), you can/should leave that out of your NOTICE.
If there's no NOTICE, you don't need to do anything.
--kevan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
@Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
"The NOTICE document is for additional copyright and attribution statements
those licenses may require."
=> As all libraries that are shipped are compliant to the Apache License I
would have expected that it is sufficient to only add a section to the
Notice file where the License requires additionall attribution.
All 3th party licenses are in the License file.
I don't see any requirements for duplicating the same in the Notice file.
Sebastian
2012/6/26 sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> On 26 June 2012 10:55, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
> > negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that far)
> >
> > There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
> > Results:
> > PPMC:
> > aaf +1 (mentor)
> > solomax +1
> > eschwert +1
> > alvaro +1
> >
> > Wider Community: 3 times +3
> >
> > Result Vote Thread:
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9MMjmZCbKKQ9ud64i4OPV2FJ9h6daqoS5q9%3DxOZVad_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > The Vote Thread:
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9Xo7B13C14Uqq8VF%3DTCh3C7PNX6%2BQ4YJvO0cDej0e9vA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/README
> >
> > Full Changelog:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/CHANGELOG
> >
> > Release artefacts:
> > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc2/
>
> The ASF releases source.
> Why is there no Zip archive of the source?
> There a zip and tar archives for the binary builds.
>
> The binary build includes a lot of 3rd party jars (about 80?, most of
> them duplicated).
> It's not clear if all the licenses for the included jars are included
> in the LICENSE file.
> I would expect some of them to require mention in the NOTICE file.
>
> The N&L files included in SVN, source and binary archives must relate
> only to the content which is actually included.
> This generally means different N&L files for the binary archives
> (unless the binary is created only from the source).
>
> The NOTICE files must only have *required* notices.
>
> > Tag:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/
>
> The NOTICE file looks wrong; it should not include the full licence
> for iCal4j which should be in the appropriate LICENSE file.
> The NOTICE file is for required notices only.
>
> As far as I can tell, only the FamFamFam icons are included in the
> source release (and SVN) so the corresponding N&L files should only
> refer to them.
>
> > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Wagner
> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > http://www.openmeetings.de
> > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.openmeetings.de
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
@Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
"The NOTICE document is for additional copyright and attribution statements
those licenses may require."
=> As all libraries that are shipped are compliant to the Apache License I
would have expected that it is sufficient to only add a section to the
Notice file where the License requires additionall attribution.
All 3th party licenses are in the License file.
I don't see any requirements for duplicating the same in the Notice file.
Sebastian
2012/6/26 sebb <se...@gmail.com>
> On 26 June 2012 10:55, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
> > negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that far)
> >
> > There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
> > Results:
> > PPMC:
> > aaf +1 (mentor)
> > solomax +1
> > eschwert +1
> > alvaro +1
> >
> > Wider Community: 3 times +3
> >
> > Result Vote Thread:
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9MMjmZCbKKQ9ud64i4OPV2FJ9h6daqoS5q9%3DxOZVad_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > The Vote Thread:
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9Xo7B13C14Uqq8VF%3DTCh3C7PNX6%2BQ4YJvO0cDej0e9vA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/README
> >
> > Full Changelog:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/CHANGELOG
> >
> > Release artefacts:
> > http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc2/
>
> The ASF releases source.
> Why is there no Zip archive of the source?
> There a zip and tar archives for the binary builds.
>
> The binary build includes a lot of 3rd party jars (about 80?, most of
> them duplicated).
> It's not clear if all the licenses for the included jars are included
> in the LICENSE file.
> I would expect some of them to require mention in the NOTICE file.
>
> The N&L files included in SVN, source and binary archives must relate
> only to the content which is actually included.
> This generally means different N&L files for the binary archives
> (unless the binary is created only from the source).
>
> The NOTICE files must only have *required* notices.
>
> > Tag:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/
>
> The NOTICE file looks wrong; it should not include the full licence
> for iCal4j which should be in the appropriate LICENSE file.
> The NOTICE file is for required notices only.
>
> As far as I can tell, only the FamFamFam icons are included in the
> source release (and SVN) so the corresponding N&L files should only
> refer to them.
>
> > PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > --
> > Sebastian Wagner
> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> > http://www.openmeetings.de
> > http://www.webbase-design.de
> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> > seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.openmeetings.de
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 26 June 2012 10:55, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
> negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that far)
>
> There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
> Results:
> PPMC:
> aaf +1 (mentor)
> solomax +1
> eschwert +1
> alvaro +1
>
> Wider Community: 3 times +3
>
> Result Vote Thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9MMjmZCbKKQ9ud64i4OPV2FJ9h6daqoS5q9%3DxOZVad_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> The Vote Thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9Xo7B13C14Uqq8VF%3DTCh3C7PNX6%2BQ4YJvO0cDej0e9vA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/README
>
> Full Changelog:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/CHANGELOG
>
> Release artefacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc2/
The ASF releases source.
Why is there no Zip archive of the source?
There a zip and tar archives for the binary builds.
The binary build includes a lot of 3rd party jars (about 80?, most of
them duplicated).
It's not clear if all the licenses for the included jars are included
in the LICENSE file.
I would expect some of them to require mention in the NOTICE file.
The N&L files included in SVN, source and binary archives must relate
only to the content which is actually included.
This generally means different N&L files for the binary archives
(unless the binary is created only from the source).
The NOTICE files must only have *required* notices.
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/
The NOTICE file looks wrong; it should not include the full licence
for iCal4j which should be in the appropriate LICENSE file.
The NOTICE file is for required notices only.
As far as I can tell, only the FamFamFam icons are included in the
source release (and SVN) so the corresponding N&L files should only
refer to them.
> PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Best regards.
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.openmeetings.de
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release OpenMeetings 2.0-incubating (Candidate 2)
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
My Vote is +1 :)
2012/6/26 seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>
> Hi,
>
> that is the second Release Candidate (the first Candidate was voted
> negative on the openmeetings dev mailing list and did not came that far)
>
> There was already a vote at the OpenMetings Dev mailing list.
> Results:
> PPMC:
> aaf +1 (mentor)
> solomax +1
> eschwert +1
> alvaro +1
>
> Wider Community: 3 times +3
>
> Result Vote Thread:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9MMjmZCbKKQ9ud64i4OPV2FJ9h6daqoS5q9%3DxOZVad_w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> The Vote Thread:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-openmeetings-dev/201206.mbox/%3CCACeMiA9Xo7B13C14Uqq8VF%3DTCh3C7PNX6%2BQ4YJvO0cDej0e9vA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> Main changes are covered in the Readme:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/README
>
> Full Changelog:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/CHANGELOG
>
> Release artefacts:
> http://people.apache.org/~sebawagner/rc2/
>
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/tags/2.0RC2/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 93A30395):
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openmeetings/project/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Best regards.
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.openmeetings.de
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.openmeetings.de
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com