You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@pulsar.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/04/13 15:28:31 UTC

[GitHub] [pulsar] cbornet edited a comment on issue #6720: Make ServerCnx independent of Netty

cbornet edited a comment on issue #6720: Make ServerCnx independent of Netty
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6720#issuecomment-612947134
 
 
   >  the change seems to contain a lot of changes related to renaming ServerCnx to PulsarServerCnx. Can we avoid doing that?
   
   The change consists in extracting an interface for ServerCnx. So that the Pulsar binary protocol is an implementation of that interface and we can have other implementations with different wire protocols such as GrpcServerCnx, RSocketServerCnx, etc ...
   I can keep ServerCnx for the implementation and find another name for the interface instead. Do you prefer that ? How should I name the interface ?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services