You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2005/06/12 06:56:02 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35069] - [shale] Dialog should allow flexible entry points

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35069>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35069


craig.mcclanahan@sun.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




------- Additional Comments From craig.mcclanahan@sun.com  2005-06-12 06:56 -------
My gut feel is that alternate entry points are like "go to" statements, when you
should really be using subdialogs ("gosub" statements in ancient BASIC
terminology) instead.  Like a method in most object oriented languages, a dialog
has a single entry point but possible multiple exit points ("return"
statements).  Violating this restriction implies that the caller has WAY too
much knowledge about the internals of the dialog to be using it safely.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org