You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@flink.apache.org by rm...@apache.org on 2019/08/13 13:49:38 UTC

[flink-web] branch asf-site updated: Fix typo in contributing/how-to-contribute.md

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

rmetzger pushed a commit to branch asf-site
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/flink-web.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/asf-site by this push:
     new 7d1e183  Fix typo in contributing/how-to-contribute.md
7d1e183 is described below

commit 7d1e183ad3b6cec029370401447cd4304504af7b
Author: tison <wa...@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Tue Aug 13 06:23:44 2019 +0800

    Fix typo in contributing/how-to-contribute.md
---
 contributing/how-to-contribute.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/contributing/how-to-contribute.md b/contributing/how-to-contribute.md
index 0f74806..e7df6a5 100644
--- a/contributing/how-to-contribute.md
+++ b/contributing/how-to-contribute.md
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ While the prior points give ways to identify promising candidates, the following
 
   - Being community minded: The candidate understands the meritocratic principles of community management. They do not always optimize for as much as possible personal contribution, but will help and empower others where it makes sense.
 
-  - We trust that a committer candidate will use their write access to the repositories responsibly, an if in doubt, conservatively. Flink is a big system, and it is important that committers are aware of what they know and what they don't know. In doubt, committers should ask for a second pair of eyes rather than commit to parts that they are not well familiar with. (Even the most seasoned committers follow this practice.)
+  - We trust that a committer candidate will use their write access to the repositories responsibly, and if in doubt, conservatively. Flink is a big system, and it is important that committers are aware of what they know and what they don't know. In doubt, committers should ask for a second pair of eyes rather than commit to parts that they are not well familiar with. (Even the most seasoned committers follow this practice.)
   
   - They have shown to be respectful towards other community members and constructive in discussions.