You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@beam.apache.org by Kyle Weaver <kc...@google.com> on 2021/01/07 20:42:13 UTC

Website is MIT licensed?

Hi all,

I discovered the Beam website's NPM module purports to be MIT licensed [1].
I don't think we publish the website's NPM package anywhere, but wouldn't
the website be Apache 2.0 licensed like everything else?

Thanks,
Kyle

[1]
https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/30f9a607509940f78459e4fba847617399780246/website/www/package.json#L6

Re: Website is MIT licensed?

Posted by Griselda Cuevas <gr...@apache.org>.

Thank you both.

On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 16:06, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:

> I agree with you. I guess we missed this during the website migration.
>
> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/13698 is to fix.
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 12:42 PM Kyle Weaver <kc...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I discovered the Beam website's NPM module purports to be MIT licensed
>> [1]. I don't think we publish the website's NPM package anywhere, but
>> wouldn't the website be Apache 2.0 licensed like everything else?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kyle
>>
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/30f9a607509940f78459e4fba847617399780246/website/www/package.json#L6
>>
>

Re: Website is MIT licensed?

Posted by Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>.

I agree with you. I guess we missed this during the website migration.

https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/13698 is to fix.

On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 12:42 PM Kyle Weaver <kc...@google.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I discovered the Beam website's NPM module purports to be MIT licensed
> [1]. I don't think we publish the website's NPM package anywhere, but
> wouldn't the website be Apache 2.0 licensed like everything else?
>
> Thanks,
> Kyle
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/30f9a607509940f78459e4fba847617399780246/website/www/package.json#L6
>