You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Mike Drob (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/01/09 23:16:58 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-9937) StandardDirectoryFactory::move never
uses atomic implementation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Mike Drob resolved SOLR-9937.
-----------------------------
Resolution: Duplicate
> StandardDirectoryFactory::move never uses atomic implementation
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-9937
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9937
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Mike Drob
> Assignee: Mark Miller
> Attachments: SOLR-9937.patch
>
>
> {noformat}
> Path path1 = ((FSDirectory) baseFromDir).getDirectory().toAbsolutePath();
> Path path2 = ((FSDirectory) baseFromDir).getDirectory().toAbsolutePath();
>
> try {
> Files.move(path1.resolve(fileName), path2.resolve(fileName), StandardCopyOption.ATOMIC_MOVE);
> } catch (AtomicMoveNotSupportedException e) {
> Files.move(path1.resolve(fileName), path2.resolve(fileName));
> }
> {noformat}
> Because {{path1 == path2}} this code never does anything and move always defaults to the less efficient implementation in DirectoryFactory.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org