You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/10/27 14:38:44 UTC
[jira] Created: (DERBY-3924) Create test for restart of slave after
master has crashed
Create test for restart of slave after master has crashed
---------------------------------------------------------
Key: DERBY-3924
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3924
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Test
Components: Replication, Test
Affects Versions: 10.4.2.1, 10.5.0.0
Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
Priority: Minor
The fix for DERBY-3878 didn't include a regression test. We should add a new test case to the replication tests that does the following:
1) start slave
2) start master
3) kill master without stopping it first
4) stop slave, but leave the slave JVM running
5) start a new slave using the same port as the slave stopped in (4)
Step (5) should cause an address-already-in-use exception without the fix for DERBY-3878.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (DERBY-3924) Create test for restart of slave after
master has crashed
Posted by "Dag H. Wanvik (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Dag H. Wanvik updated DERBY-3924:
---------------------------------
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Test)
> Create test for restart of slave after master has crashed
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3924
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3924
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Replication, Test
> Affects Versions: 10.4.2.1, 10.5.1.1
> Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
> Priority: Minor
>
> The fix for DERBY-3878 didn't include a regression test. We should add a new test case to the replication tests that does the following:
> 1) start slave
> 2) start master
> 3) kill master without stopping it first
> 4) stop slave, but leave the slave JVM running
> 5) start a new slave using the same port as the slave stopped in (4)
> Step (5) should cause an address-already-in-use exception without the fix for DERBY-3878.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.