You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@inlong.apache.org by Goson zhang <go...@apache.org> on 2021/12/08 11:55:06 UTC

[DISCUSS] Should we start with 1.0.0 for the next version number?

All:

At present, the InLong project has undergone a name change and feature
expansion, and has gradually reached the expectations before the original
name change, and reached the initial model after the name change.

The current 0.12.0 version is about to be released, after this version is
released, should we use a new version number for the next version?

I personally feel that if the 0.xx.yy version is maintained for iteration,
it is easy for users and features to be unable to distinguish the changes
before and after.

Thanks!

回复：[DISCUSS] Should we start with 1.0.0 for the next version number?

Posted by 张 超 <29...@qq.com.INVALID>.
If we use version 1.0.0, the project should be sufficiently stable and complete. Looking at the latest things done by the InLong community: standardized document construction, increased supporting monitoring, and increased audits, it is evident that InLong has gradually matured. So I think it’s a good thing to set to version 1.0.0.




------------------&nbsp;原始邮件&nbsp;------------------
发件人:                                                                                                                        "dev@inlong.apache.orggosonzhang@apache.org"                                                                                    <gosonzhang@apache.org&gt;;
发送时间:&nbsp;2021年12月8日(星期三) 晚上7:55
收件人:&nbsp;"dev"<dev@inlong.apache.org&gt;;

主题:&nbsp;[DISCUSS] Should we start with 1.0.0 for the next version number?



All:

At present, the InLong project has undergone a name change and feature
expansion, and has gradually reached the expectations before the original
name change, and reached the initial model after the name change.

The current 0.12.0 version is about to be released, after this version is
released, should we use a new version number for the next version?

I personally feel that if the 0.xx.yy version is maintained for iteration,
it is easy for users and features to be unable to distinguish the changes
before and after.

Thanks!

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we start with 1.0.0 for the next version number?

Posted by Goson zhang <go...@apache.org>.
I started to prepare for the release of version 0.12.0.

Please talk about your opinion, if possible, I will initiate a round of
voting to collect your opinions later.

Thanks!

Goson zhang <go...@apache.org> 于2021年12月8日周三 19:55写道：

> All:
>
> At present, the InLong project has undergone a name change and feature
> expansion, and has gradually reached the expectations before the original
> name change, and reached the initial model after the name change.
>
> The current 0.12.0 version is about to be released, after this version is
> released, should we use a new version number for the next version?
>
> I personally feel that if the 0.xx.yy version is maintained for iteration,
> it is easy for users and features to be unable to distinguish the changes
> before and after.
>
> Thanks!
>