You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> on 2010/04/22 14:07:22 UTC
[VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
single vote
for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have
been updated
with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins
have been run against
of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
All tag svn versions have been
successfully built.
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
and have the same final element as the artifact name.
I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
server rejected my
original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
email. I apologize for the incovenience.
The following specs are being voted on
geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.1
geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
Source location:
geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1
geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not
been verified via TCK yet)
[RESULT][VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
The vote to release the new Geronimo Java EE 6 spec versions has passed
with 6 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. The new versions will be released
to central today.
Donald Woods
Kevan Miller
Jarek Gawor
Joe Bohn
David Jencks
Rick McGuire
Rick
On 4/22/2010 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
> single vote
> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs
> have been updated
> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins
> have been run against
> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
> All tag svn versions have been
> successfully built.
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>
> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>
> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>
> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
> server rejected my
> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
> email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>
> The following specs are being voted on
>
> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>
> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>
> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> Source location:
> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>
> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not
> been verified via TCK yet)
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
Forgot my +1 too.
On 4/25/2010 4:04 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Looks good. Thanks Rick! Here's my +1
>
> --kevan
> On Apr 22, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>
>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
>> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a single vote
>> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have been updated
>> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins have been run against
>> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests. All tag svn versions have been
>> successfully built.
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>>
>> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>>
>> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>>
>> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list server rejected my
>> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>>
>> The following specs are being voted on
>>
>> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
>> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>>
>> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>>
>> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>
>> Source location:
>> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>
>> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
>> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
>> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
>> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>>
>> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not been verified via TCK yet)
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
Looks good. Thanks Rick! Here's my +1
--kevan
On Apr 22, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a single vote
> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have been updated
> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins have been run against
> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests. All tag svn versions have been
> successfully built.
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>
> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>
> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>
> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list server rejected my
> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>
> The following specs are being voted on
>
> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>
> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>
> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> Source location:
> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>
> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not been verified via TCK yet)
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
+1
Looks good to me. I built the specs, checked rat, etc... included them
(and the aries artifacts up for vote) in a Geronimo 3.0 server image and
was able to deploy and run the Aries Blog & AriesTrader samples.
Joe
On 4/22/10 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
> single vote
> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have
> been updated
> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins
> have been run against
> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests. All
> tag svn versions have been
> successfully built.
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>
> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>
> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>
> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
> server rejected my
> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
> email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>
> The following specs are being voted on
>
> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>
> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>
> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> Source location:
> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>
> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not
> been verified via TCK yet)
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
+1
I checked that all the source-release tar.gz's compile and that geronimo runs with them.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a single vote
> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have been updated
> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins have been run against
> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests. All tag svn versions have been
> successfully built.
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>
> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>
> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>
> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list server rejected my
> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>
> The following specs are being voted on
>
> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>
> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>
> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> Source location:
> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>
> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not been verified via TCK yet)
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)
Posted by Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com>.
+1.
I built Geronimo with the updated specs and ran tck smoketests and all
looks good to me.
Jarek
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a single
> vote
> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have
> been updated
> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins have
> been run against
> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests. All
> tag svn versions have been
> successfully built.
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>
> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>
> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>
> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list server
> rejected my
> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the email. I
> apologize for the incovenience.
>
> The following specs are being voted on
>
> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>
> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>
> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> Source location:
> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>
> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not been
> verified via TCK yet)
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Believe these are okay after second look.
+1
-Donald
On 4/22/10 3:43 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Here are 3 scripts <attached> to help checkout, rat:check and build the
> tags in the vote.
>
> Can we ignore the following rat:check failures?
>
> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0 -
> src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/xml.xsd
> src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/XMLSchema.dtd
>
> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7 -
> src/test/resources/wmtom.bin
>
> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider -
> Several files under - src/main/resources/OSGI-INF/providers/
>
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 4/22/10 1:03 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>> On 4/22/2010 12:58 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>> 1) Rick, I think the staging repo included below is for the RC2 vote.
>>> Shouldn't it be -
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-007/
>>>
>>> 2) You hadn't dropped the previous 030 staging files in Nexus yet (from
>>> 4/16), so I did that for you.
>>>
>> Thanks. I remembered at one point that I needed to so that, but forgot
>> to go back and do the actual trop.
>>
>>> 3) The JPA spec below should be listed as geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1,
>>> based on the tag and files in the 007 staging repo.
>>>
>>
>> Unless I'm missing something, that's exactly how it IS listed. I
>> corrected the error of the last cycle to make this 1.1 not 1.2.
>>
>> Rick
>>>
>>> -Donald
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/22/10 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>
>>>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
>>>> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
>>>> single vote
>>>> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have
>>>> been updated
>>>> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins
>>>> have been run against
>>>> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
>>>> All tag svn versions have been
>>>> successfully built.
>>>>
>>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Staging repo:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>>>>
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>>>>
>>>> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>>>>
>>>> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
>>>> server rejected my
>>>> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
>>>> email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>>>>
>>>> The following specs are being voted on
>>>>
>>>> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
>>>> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
>>>> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
>>>> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
>>>> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
>>>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
>>>> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
>>>> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
>>>> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.1
>>>> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
>>>> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>>>>
>>>> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>>>>
>>>> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>>>
>>>> Source location:
>>>> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>>>
>>>> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
>>>> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
>>>> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
>>>> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
>>>> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
>>>> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
>>>> geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1
>>>> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
>>>> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
>>>> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
>>>> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
>>>> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
>>>> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
>>>> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>>>>
>>>> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not
>>>> been verified via TCK yet)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Here are 3 scripts <attached> to help checkout, rat:check and build the
> tags in the vote.
Thanks for the scripts. A few comments:
1) We are voting on source artifacts, not svn. So, I use wget. (e.g. 'wget --no-check-certificate https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-007/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-activation_1.1_spec/1.1/geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1-source-release.tar.gz).
2) I generally try to insure that the svn tag is equivalent to the source archive (e.g. 'diff -r --strip-trailing-cr geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1 geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-svn') SVN's handling of $Date tags can make this a bit painful...
3) Easier to use 'svn export' rather than 'svn co'
4) I generally try to verify the signatures and checksums also.
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Can we ignore the following rat:check failures?
>
> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0 -
> src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/xml.xsd
> src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/XMLSchema.dtd
>
> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7 -
> src/test/resources/wmtom.bin
>
> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider -
> Several files under - src/main/resources/OSGI-INF/providers/
All look fine to me...
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Here are 3 scripts <attached> to help checkout, rat:check and build the
tags in the vote.
Can we ignore the following rat:check failures?
geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0 -
src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/xml.xsd
src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/XMLSchema.dtd
geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7 -
src/test/resources/wmtom.bin
geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider -
Several files under - src/main/resources/OSGI-INF/providers/
-Donald
On 4/22/10 1:03 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/22/2010 12:58 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> 1) Rick, I think the staging repo included below is for the RC2 vote.
>> Shouldn't it be -
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-007/
>>
>> 2) You hadn't dropped the previous 030 staging files in Nexus yet (from
>> 4/16), so I did that for you.
>>
> Thanks. I remembered at one point that I needed to so that, but forgot
> to go back and do the actual trop.
>
>> 3) The JPA spec below should be listed as geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1,
>> based on the tag and files in the 007 staging repo.
>>
>
> Unless I'm missing something, that's exactly how it IS listed. I
> corrected the error of the last cycle to make this 1.1 not 1.2.
>
> Rick
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> On 4/22/10 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
>>> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
>>> single vote
>>> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have
>>> been updated
>>> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins
>>> have been run against
>>> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
>>> All tag svn versions have been
>>> successfully built.
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>>
>>> Staging repo:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>>>
>>>
>>> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>>>
>>> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>>>
>>> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
>>> server rejected my
>>> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
>>> email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>>>
>>> The following specs are being voted on
>>>
>>> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
>>> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.1
>>> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
>>> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>>>
>>> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>>>
>>> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>>
>>> Source location:
>>> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>>
>>> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
>>> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
>>> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1
>>> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
>>> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
>>> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
>>> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>>>
>>> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not
>>> been verified via TCK yet)
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
On 4/22/2010 12:58 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> 1) Rick, I think the staging repo included below is for the RC2 vote.
> Shouldn't it be -
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-007/
>
> 2) You hadn't dropped the previous 030 staging files in Nexus yet (from
> 4/16), so I did that for you.
>
Thanks. I remembered at one point that I needed to so that, but forgot
to go back and do the actual trop.
> 3) The JPA spec below should be listed as geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1,
> based on the tag and files in the 007 staging repo.
>
Unless I'm missing something, that's exactly how it IS listed. I
corrected the error of the last cycle to make this 1.1 not 1.2.
Rick
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 4/22/10 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
>> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
>> single vote
>> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have
>> been updated
>> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins
>> have been run against
>> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
>> All tag svn versions have been
>> successfully built.
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>>
>> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>>
>> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>>
>> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
>> server rejected my
>> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
>> email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>>
>> The following specs are being voted on
>>
>> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
>> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>>
>> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>>
>> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>
>> Source location:
>> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>
>> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
>> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
>> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
>> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
>> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
>> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>>
>> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not
>> been verified via TCK yet)
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
1) Rick, I think the staging repo included below is for the RC2 vote.
Shouldn't it be -
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-007/
2) You hadn't dropped the previous 030 staging files in Nexus yet (from
4/16), so I did that for you.
3) The JPA spec below should be listed as geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1,
based on the tag and files in the 007 staging repo.
-Donald
On 4/22/10 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
> single vote
> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have
> been updated
> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins
> have been run against
> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
> All tag svn versions have been
> successfully built.
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>
> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>
> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>
> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
> server rejected my
> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
> email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>
> The following specs are being voted on
>
> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>
> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>
> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> Source location:
> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>
> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>
> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not
> been verified via TCK yet)
>