Wording, again, of the code donation

[Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>]

Hi all,

The hold up in terms of the code donation continues to be a 'simple' case
of the wording, still.

We -- i.e., both on Oracle and Apache sides -- want to be very clear about
what exactly, of the large repo and various bits and pieces -- we're
donating. There are clearly parts we do not want to donate, etc, e.g., the
Java compiler fork, for example.

Below is the current wording, i.e., we're making sure we're not
accidentally donating Java documentation that may be at netbeans.org (but
as far as I'm aware no such documentation exists there, though we're just
making sure etc):

1.  "org.netbeans" and "org.openide" package hierarchy source code within
the "org.netbeans" and "org.openide" namespaces located at the "
hg.netbeans.org" repository, excluding hg.netbeans.org/main/nb-javac and
hg.netbeans.org/apitest

2.  The following NetBeans documentation at netbeans.org:
- the tutorials
- the feature pages
- articles and interviews


Of course, if something is accidentally donated it can be undonated though
we don't want to have things even in the history of an Apache Git repo that
shouldn't be there. I know all this may seem fussy and unnecessary, even,
however we are erring on the side of caution.

Can others look at 1. and 2. above and check if anything is missing from
there that we would want to have?

Thanks,

Geertjan

Re: Wording, again, of the code donation

[Ivan Soleimanipour <iv...@oracle.com>]

> 
> 2.  The following NetBeans documentation at netbeans.org:
> - the tutorials
> - the feature pages
> - articles and interviews

wiki?

Re: Wording, again, of the code donation

[Emilian Bold <em...@gmail.com>]

Any update on this?

It would be nice to get this done in 2016.


--emi

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>
wrote:

> Agree, seems that is precise enough.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 07.12.2016 um 11:28 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacretaz@apache.org>:
> >
> > Hi Geertjan,
> >
> > The wording that you suggest works for me, I think it's precise enough.
> >
> > -Bertrand
>
>

Re: Wording, again, of the code donation

[Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>]

Agree, seems that is precise enough.

LieGrue,
strub

> Am 07.12.2016 um 11:28 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>:
> 
> Hi Geertjan,
> 
> The wording that you suggest works for me, I think it's precise enough.
> 
> -Bertrand

Re: Wording, again, of the code donation

[Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>]

Hi Geertjan,

The wording that you suggest works for me, I think it's precise enough.

-Bertrand

Re: Wording, again, of the code donation

[Ognyan Kulev <og...@ognyankulev.com>]

On 2016-12-07 11:51 (+0200), Geertjan Wielenga <g....@googlemail.com> wrote:

 > 2.  The following NetBeans documentation at netbeans.org:
 > - the tutorials
 > - the feature pages
 > - articles and interviews

Does "tutorials" include the learning trails in 
https://netbeans.org/kb/index.html ?

What are your plans for the user guide 
<http://docs.oracle.com/netbeans/nb82/netbeans/NBDAG/toc.htm>?

Best regards,
Ognyan