You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cloudstack.apache.org by Keerthiraja SJ <sj...@gmail.com> on 2015/07/11 06:04:27 UTC
Is ACS will Support Docker
Hi All,
Can anyone say will the ACS will support docker / RancherOS / CoreOS so
that we can create a container via cloudstack and assign same as now public
IP to the container.
Thanks,
Keerthi
Re: Is ACS will Support Docker
Posted by Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/11/2015 06:04 AM, Keerthiraja SJ wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can anyone say will the ACS will support docker / RancherOS /
> CoreOS so that we can create a container via cloudstack and assign
> same as now public IP to the container.
>
There are currently no plans for this.
A piece of my personal opinion on this topic: I don't think that
managing Docker containers is a thing that CloudStack should do.
RangerOS and CoreOS are really good at that Job. So using KMV or Xen
ACS can deploy CoreOS and let them handle the Docker deployment.
A tool like Terraform could deploy CoreOS and spawn containers afterward
s.
ACS should focus on managing infrastructure and deploying that quickly
and reliable.
Wido
> Thanks, Keerthi
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=3LMs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Is ACS will Support Docker
Posted by Sebastien Goasguen <ru...@gmail.com>.
> On Jul 11, 2015, at 6:04 AM, Keerthiraja SJ <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Can anyone say will the ACS will support docker / RancherOS / CoreOS so
> that we can create a container via cloudstack and assign same as now public
> IP to the container.
>
if you search the archive you will see that we have discussed this several times already.
CoreOS templates are well supported and several cloudstack providers already offer it in production.
RancherOS is not yet available as a cloudstack template, that would be a nice project. Any takers ?
Soem folks are packaging cloudstack in containers for easy deployment.
To date a few of us don’t think cloudstack should orchestrate containers, we prefer to leave that to swarm/kubernetes or lattice.
That said there is a ‘docker’ branch in the repo, that was a proof of concept of supporting docker…
As far as networking in docker, it is fast evolving right now. Docker network is not yet release. IMHO there is no point of jumping hoops with bunch of NAT and IP tables magic for port forwarding until Docker network is out and stable, not before decembre 2015 (IMHO, Docker 2.0). At that time, there might be some interesting things to do in Cloudstack.
> Thanks,
> Keerthi
Re: Is ACS will Support Docker
Posted by Sebastien Goasguen <ru...@gmail.com>.
> On Jul 11, 2015, at 6:04 AM, Keerthiraja SJ <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Can anyone say will the ACS will support docker / RancherOS / CoreOS so
> that we can create a container via cloudstack and assign same as now public
> IP to the container.
>
if you search the archive you will see that we have discussed this several times already.
CoreOS templates are well supported and several cloudstack providers already offer it in production.
RancherOS is not yet available as a cloudstack template, that would be a nice project. Any takers ?
Soem folks are packaging cloudstack in containers for easy deployment.
To date a few of us don’t think cloudstack should orchestrate containers, we prefer to leave that to swarm/kubernetes or lattice.
That said there is a ‘docker’ branch in the repo, that was a proof of concept of supporting docker…
As far as networking in docker, it is fast evolving right now. Docker network is not yet release. IMHO there is no point of jumping hoops with bunch of NAT and IP tables magic for port forwarding until Docker network is out and stable, not before decembre 2015 (IMHO, Docker 2.0). At that time, there might be some interesting things to do in Cloudstack.
> Thanks,
> Keerthi