You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@myfaces.apache.org by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> on 2006/05/28 06:09:37 UTC
Version of Servlet Container - Facelets
May I ask a question out loud?
In discussing implementing 1.2, the question has arisen what kind of
servlet containers most users have in use currently respectively plan
to use in the next half year.
Can you answer with the corresponding number to help us figure out an
optimal way of going on with the 1.2 implementation?
(for me personally it's 1 - I can't change over my current project to
facelets this easily, and this is why I'm stuck with number 1)
regards,
Martin
1) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant)
2) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant) with facelets (or willing
to change their current projects to facelets, if necessary)
3) TC 6 or Glassfish (or other JSP 2.1 compliant)
Re: Version of Servlet Container - Facelets
Posted by Michael Youngstrom <yo...@gmail.com>.
(2)
On 5/27/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> May I ask a question out loud?
>
> In discussing implementing 1.2, the question has arisen what kind of
> servlet containers most users have in use currently respectively plan
> to use in the next half year.
>
> Can you answer with the corresponding number to help us figure out an
> optimal way of going on with the 1.2 implementation?
>
> (for me personally it's 1 - I can't change over my current project to
> facelets this easily, and this is why I'm stuck with number 1)
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> 1) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant)
> 2) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant) with facelets (or willing
> to change their current projects to facelets, if necessary)
> 3) TC 6 or Glassfish (or other JSP 2.1 compliant)
>
Re: Version of Servlet Container - Facelets
Posted by baz <c....@bafz.de>.
>
Option [2] and in future times eventually [3]
Re: Version of Servlet Container - Facelets
Posted by Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at>.
Hi!
> 1) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant)
and
> 3) TC 6 or Glassfish (or other JSP 2.1 compliant)
>
TC6 after the first few stable builds. If no other technique requires
ist, I am not sure if we move away from tomcat.
Its also not sure if we ever move to facelets. Especially when upcoming
jsf releases solve some shortcomings with the current jsp view
creation/handling.
Ciao,
Mario
Re: Version of Servlet Container - Facelets
Posted by Jeff Bischoff <jb...@klkurz.com>.
Option (1) currently (JBoss 4.x)
Option (3) on future projects, if JBoss 5.x is released by then.
Martin Marinschek wrote:
> May I ask a question out loud?
>
> In discussing implementing 1.2, the question has arisen what kind of
> servlet containers most users have in use currently respectively plan
> to use in the next half year.
>
> Can you answer with the corresponding number to help us figure out an
> optimal way of going on with the 1.2 implementation?
>
> (for me personally it's 1 - I can't change over my current project to
> facelets this easily, and this is why I'm stuck with number 1)
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> 1) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant)
> 2) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant) with facelets (or willing
> to change their current projects to facelets, if necessary)
> 3) TC 6 or Glassfish (or other JSP 2.1 compliant)
>
>
Re: Version of Servlet Container - Facelets
Posted by Vesa Lindfors <ve...@gmail.com>.
1 for current and existing projects, 2 for new ones in following 6 months
--- VLi ---
On 5/28/06, Julian Ray <ju...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> 1 for me although I could change to 2 when building the next version (6-9
> months) but would look at also moving to JBOSS then (depending on RH
> licensing).
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:martin.marinschek@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:10 AM
> To: MyFaces Discussion; MyFaces Development
> Subject: Version of Servlet Container - Facelets
>
> May I ask a question out loud?
>
> In discussing implementing 1.2, the question has arisen what kind of
> servlet
> containers most users have in use currently respectively plan to use in
> the
> next half year.
>
> Can you answer with the corresponding number to help us figure out an
> optimal way of going on with the 1.2 implementation?
>
> (for me personally it's 1 - I can't change over my current project to
> facelets this easily, and this is why I'm stuck with number 1)
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> 1) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant)
> 2) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant) with facelets (or willing to
> change their current projects to facelets, if necessary)
> 3) TC 6 or Glassfish (or other JSP 2.1 compliant)
>
>
Re: Version of Servlet Container - Facelets
Posted by Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net>.
2
--
Dave Brondsema
Software Developer
Cornerstone University
Re: Version of Servlet Container - Facelets
Posted by Adam Brod <AB...@intralinks.com>.
2 - Facelets is great!
Adam Brod
Product Development Team
"Martin Marinschek" <ma...@gmail.com>
05/28/2006 12:09 AM
Please respond to
"MyFaces Discussion" <us...@myfaces.apache.org>
To
"MyFaces Discussion" <us...@myfaces.apache.org>, "MyFaces Development"
<de...@myfaces.apache.org>
cc
Subject
Version of Servlet Container - Facelets
May I ask a question out loud?
In discussing implementing 1.2, the question has arisen what kind of
servlet containers most users have in use currently respectively plan
to use in the next half year.
Can you answer with the corresponding number to help us figure out an
optimal way of going on with the 1.2 implementation?
(for me personally it's 1 - I can't change over my current project to
facelets this easily, and this is why I'm stuck with number 1)
regards,
Martin
1) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant)
2) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant) with facelets (or willing
to change their current projects to facelets, if necessary)
3) TC 6 or Glassfish (or other JSP 2.1 compliant)
Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of this email and any attachments. Thank you.
RE: Version of Servlet Container - Facelets
Posted by Julian Ray <ju...@yahoo.com>.
1 for me although I could change to 2 when building the next version (6-9
months) but would look at also moving to JBOSS then (depending on RH
licensing).
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:martin.marinschek@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 12:10 AM
To: MyFaces Discussion; MyFaces Development
Subject: Version of Servlet Container - Facelets
May I ask a question out loud?
In discussing implementing 1.2, the question has arisen what kind of servlet
containers most users have in use currently respectively plan to use in the
next half year.
Can you answer with the corresponding number to help us figure out an
optimal way of going on with the 1.2 implementation?
(for me personally it's 1 - I can't change over my current project to
facelets this easily, and this is why I'm stuck with number 1)
regards,
Martin
1) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant)
2) TC 5.x (or other not JSP 2.1 compliant) with facelets (or willing to
change their current projects to facelets, if necessary)
3) TC 6 or Glassfish (or other JSP 2.1 compliant)