Re: Velocity-like tools for C++ (porting velocity?)

[Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>]

"Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@adeptra.com> writes:

> On 6/1/02 1:17 PM, "Jon Scott Stevens" <jo...@latchkey.com> wrote:
>
>> What about JNI connectors to Velocity?
>> 
>
> Isn't that the wrong way?  Doesn't the C++ proggie need to start a JVM for
> the java code to run in?  I am familiar with the other direction, Java code
> using JNI to run C stuff, but not the reverse...

If running native code from inside a JVM using JNI, said native code
can call back to Java code (also using the JNI API).  I've never tried
this without having the "starting point" be a JVM.

- Dan

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: Velocity-like tools for C++ (porting velocity?)

["Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@adeptra.com>]

On 7/8/02 5:23 PM, "Daniel Rall" <dl...@finemaltcoding.com> wrote:

> "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@adeptra.com> writes:
> 
>> On 6/1/02 1:17 PM, "Jon Scott Stevens" <jo...@latchkey.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> What about JNI connectors to Velocity?
>>> 
>> 
>> Isn't that the wrong way?  Doesn't the C++ proggie need to start a JVM for
>> the java code to run in?  I am familiar with the other direction, Java code
>> using JNI to run C stuff, but not the reverse...
> 
> If running native code from inside a JVM using JNI, said native code
> can call back to Java code (also using the JNI API).  I've never tried
> this without having the "starting point" be a JVM.
> 

Jeeze, your mail queue is big... :)

That's what I was getting at - you need to start with the JVM, afaik.

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr. 
Research & Development, Adeptra Inc.
geirm@adeptra.com
+1-203-247-1713



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>