You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com> on 2006/10/02 21:46:20 UTC
Re: nodeps jar
Hmm... nobody knows about (1) and nobody minds about (2)? Going once...
-Matt
----- Original Message ----
From: Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com>
To: Ant Developers List <de...@ant.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:00:27 PM
Subject: nodeps jar
I'm curious why the launcher classes are in this jar. Do they really need to be?
Additionally, any arguments against "moving" (while retaining API BC) some of the always-available "optional" tasks e.g. echoproperties to oata.taskdefs?
-Matt
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: nodeps jar
Posted by Vlastimil Babka <ca...@gentoo.org>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Matt Benson wrote:
> Dangerous and/or just kind of weird. :) I can check
> whether the launcher classes are used. Even if this
> is the case, however, ant-core uses launcher classes
> and doesn't duplicate them in the jar. ant.jar
> requires ant-launcher.jar, so I don't see why
> ant-nodeps.jar shouldn't do the same.
>
I'm building/using ant-nodeps.jar without launcher classes for some time
and didn't run into troubles, so I suppose they are not used. It's just
unneeded duplication that nobody noticed, it seems.
- --
Vlastimil Babka (Caster)
Gentoo/Java
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFI37ttbrAj05h3oQRAixDAJsGkGTZFUMAvSdnLHlinvnMTlq/wwCdHJi5
KQdXRoPcpncJemsksel7Vdk=
=QVEt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: nodeps jar
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com>.
--- Antoine Levy-Lambert <an...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Matt Benson wrote:
> > Hmm... nobody knows about (1) and nobody minds
> about (2)? Going once...
> >
> > -Matt
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com>
> > To: Ant Developers List <de...@ant.apache.org>
> > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:00:27 PM
> > Subject: nodeps jar
> >
> >
> > I'm curious why the launcher classes are in this
> jar. Do they really need to be?
> >
> >
> I do not have a clue. I suppose you mean this is a
> potentially dangerous
> duplication ? May be the launcher classes are called
> from some of the
> optional nodeps tasks.
Dangerous and/or just kind of weird. :) I can check
whether the launcher classes are used. Even if this
is the case, however, ant-core uses launcher classes
and doesn't duplicate them in the jar. ant.jar
requires ant-launcher.jar, so I don't see why
ant-nodeps.jar shouldn't do the same.
> > Additionally, any arguments against "moving"
> (while retaining API BC) some of the
> always-available "optional" tasks e.g.
> echoproperties to oata.taskdefs?
> >
> >
> I do not have any objections regarding
> echoproperties. propertyfile
> would then be a similar case ?
Exactly.
> > -Matt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Regards,
>
> Antoine
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
Re: nodeps jar
Posted by Antoine Levy-Lambert <an...@gmx.de>.
Matt Benson wrote:
> Hmm... nobody knows about (1) and nobody minds about (2)? Going once...
>
> -Matt
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Matt Benson <gu...@yahoo.com>
> To: Ant Developers List <de...@ant.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:00:27 PM
> Subject: nodeps jar
>
>
> I'm curious why the launcher classes are in this jar. Do they really need to be?
>
>
I do not have a clue. I suppose you mean this is a potentially dangerous
duplication ? May be the launcher classes are called from some of the
optional nodeps tasks.
> Additionally, any arguments against "moving" (while retaining API BC) some of the always-available "optional" tasks e.g. echoproperties to oata.taskdefs?
>
>
I do not have any objections regarding echoproperties. propertyfile
would then be a similar case ?
> -Matt
>
>
>
>
Regards,
Antoine
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org