You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to phoenix-dev@avalon.apache.org by Paul Hammant <Pa...@yahoo.com> on 2002/06/30 20:04:44 UTC
Phoenix beta.
Folks,
Can we release the current Phoenix as beta instead of 4.0a4 ? Here is my +1
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Phoenix beta.
Posted by Vinay Chandran <vi...@yahoo.com>.
Hi,
>
>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9411
> >
> >is closed, -1. It's marked as "blocker", innit?
> >
Another way to work around this problem is to
reset the contextClassLoader after deploying each
sar within the
o.a.a.p.c.deployer.DefaultDeployer.deploy(..) method.
Regards,
Vinay
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Phoenix beta.
Posted by Paul Hammant <Pa...@yahoo.com>.
Leo,
>until this one:
>
>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9411
>
>is closed, -1. It's marked as "blocker", innit?
>
Yup.
>Other than that, if pete is done with the cleanup he's been doing, +1.
>
>Are you gonna do release mgmt on it?
>
I guess so. If others want to share the duty or take it on, then I'm
fine with that. Failing that I'll take it happily. Phoenix is my
primary interest.
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
two sars -> two libs
Posted by Andrei Ivanov <my...@surfeu.fi>.
In fact phoenix can run many sars. But there is no guarantee that it will
not require some modifications of sars before they will run. I had two
phoenix applications which were using jsse. Each of them run well without
another. I wasn't able to run both of them (in same Phoenix) before I moved
jsse jars from sars to phoenix/lib. I had many other similar situations when
it was necessary to move jars between sar and phoenix/lib to get sar running
(e.g. jdbc drivers etc).
Andrei
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [VOTE] Re: Phoenix beta.
Posted by Paul Hammant <Pa...@yahoo.com>.
Peter,
>On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 16:04, Leo Simons wrote:
>
>
>>hmm. Same thought crossed my mind; the part important to me is the
>>"couple of months". We've been saying/thinking similar stuff for quite
>>some time now.
>>
>>If we can agree on how many "a couple" is, just about (3 as opposed to
>>9), then I completely agree.
>>
>>
>
>a couple == when its done ;)
>
Can we do this XP style?
Which of four variables are we not going to fix for beta1 :
Cost
Time
Quality
Scope
I am voting for a fixing of scope and quality. I am suggesting time and
cost are not fixed.
If all in agreement, can we fix scope now, as it is the only one of the
two that requires a list rather than intent. Once fixed we allow
*nothing* else in.
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [VOTE] Re: Phoenix beta.
Posted by Leo Simons <le...@apache.org>.
On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 08:23, Peter Donald wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 16:04, Leo Simons wrote:
> > hmm. Same thought crossed my mind; the part important to me is the
> > "couple of months". We've been saying/thinking similar stuff for quite
> > some time now.
> >
> > If we can agree on how many "a couple" is, just about (3 as opposed to
> > 9), then I completely agree.
>
> a couple == when its done ;)
:) it is a shame the bizzniss doesn't work that way, too. I'll end up
supporting 4 different alphas...no prob tho'
- LSD
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [VOTE] Re: Phoenix beta.
Posted by Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org>.
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 16:04, Leo Simons wrote:
> hmm. Same thought crossed my mind; the part important to me is the
> "couple of months". We've been saying/thinking similar stuff for quite
> some time now.
>
> If we can agree on how many "a couple" is, just about (3 as opposed to
> 9), then I completely agree.
a couple == when its done ;)
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
---------------------------------------------------
"Wise men don't need advice. Fools don't take it."
-Benjamin Franklin
---------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [VOTE] Re: Phoenix beta.
Posted by Leo Simons <le...@apache.org>.
hmm. Same thought crossed my mind; the part important to me is the
"couple of months". We've been saying/thinking similar stuff for quite
some time now.
If we can agree on how many "a couple" is, just about (3 as opposed to
9), then I completely agree.
But I am in need of a release at some not-quite-far-point in time.
Thoughts?
grz,
- Leo
On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 00:15, Stephen McConnell wrote:
>
> Leo:
>
> I would really like to hold off on this for a couple of months. Reason
> why is that I would love to see Phoenix block defintions drop in sync
> with the containerkit xinfo model - and I don't want to push that any
> faster than current progress. Given that change - and the
> synchrnoization of the Avalon Apps blocks to the containerkit xinfo
> format - then I would be a lot happier about Phoenix going beta.
>
> Take a look at the following url for an overview of the containerkit
> xinfo format:
> http://home.osm.net/doc/containerkit/org/apache/excalibur/containerkit/infobuilder/package-summary.html
>
> Steve.
>
>
>
> Leo Simons wrote:
>
> >oh, and marking as "[VOTE]" so everyone'll read it =)
> >
> >-LSD
> >
> >On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 21:57, Leo Simons wrote:
> >
> >
> >>until this one:
> >>
> >>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9411
> >>
> >>is closed, -1. It's marked as "blocker", innit?
> >>
> >>Other than that, if pete is done with the cleanup he's been doing, +1.
> >>
> >>Are you gonna do release mgmt on it?
> >>
> >>grz,
> >>
> >>- LSD
> >>
> >>On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 20:04, Paul Hammant wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Folks,
> >>>
> >>>Can we release the current Phoenix as beta instead of 4.0a4 ? Here is my +1
> >>>
> >>>- Paul
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Stephen J. McConnell
>
> OSM SARL
> digital products for a global economy
> mailto:mcconnell@osm.net
> http://www.osm.net
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [VOTE] Re: Phoenix beta.
Posted by Stephen McConnell <mc...@osm.net>.
Leo:
I would really like to hold off on this for a couple of months. Reason
why is that I would love to see Phoenix block defintions drop in sync
with the containerkit xinfo model - and I don't want to push that any
faster than current progress. Given that change - and the
synchrnoization of the Avalon Apps blocks to the containerkit xinfo
format - then I would be a lot happier about Phoenix going beta.
Take a look at the following url for an overview of the containerkit
xinfo format:
http://home.osm.net/doc/containerkit/org/apache/excalibur/containerkit/infobuilder/package-summary.html
Steve.
Leo Simons wrote:
>oh, and marking as "[VOTE]" so everyone'll read it =)
>
>-LSD
>
>On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 21:57, Leo Simons wrote:
>
>
>>until this one:
>>
>>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9411
>>
>>is closed, -1. It's marked as "blocker", innit?
>>
>>Other than that, if pete is done with the cleanup he's been doing, +1.
>>
>>Are you gonna do release mgmt on it?
>>
>>grz,
>>
>>- LSD
>>
>>On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 20:04, Paul Hammant wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Folks,
>>>
>>>Can we release the current Phoenix as beta instead of 4.0a4 ? Here is my +1
>>>
>>>- Paul
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>>For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:mcconnell@osm.net
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
[VOTE] Re: Phoenix beta.
Posted by Leo Simons <le...@apache.org>.
oh, and marking as "[VOTE]" so everyone'll read it =)
-LSD
On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 21:57, Leo Simons wrote:
> until this one:
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9411
>
> is closed, -1. It's marked as "blocker", innit?
>
> Other than that, if pete is done with the cleanup he's been doing, +1.
>
> Are you gonna do release mgmt on it?
>
> grz,
>
> - LSD
>
> On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 20:04, Paul Hammant wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Can we release the current Phoenix as beta instead of 4.0a4 ? Here is my +1
> >
> > - Paul
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Phoenix beta.
Posted by Leo Simons <le...@apache.org>.
until this one:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9411
is closed, -1. It's marked as "blocker", innit?
Other than that, if pete is done with the cleanup he's been doing, +1.
Are you gonna do release mgmt on it?
grz,
- LSD
On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 20:04, Paul Hammant wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Can we release the current Phoenix as beta instead of 4.0a4 ? Here is my +1
>
> - Paul
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Phoenix beta.
Posted by Peter Royal <pr...@apache.org>.
On Sunday 30 June 2002 07:23 pm, Peter Donald wrote:
> I would like to see another Alpha. With the other Peter working on
> validation and the new ContainerKit stuff in the works I think it would be
> great to wait till then. But if you want to release then go ahead ;)
+1
We have a very stable alpha, but internal contracts are still under flux.
-pete
--
peter royal -> proyal@apache.org
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: Phoenix beta.
Posted by Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org>.
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 04:04, Paul Hammant wrote:
> Can we release the current Phoenix as beta instead of 4.0a4 ? Here is my
> +1
I would like to see another Alpha. With the other Peter working on validation
and the new ContainerKit stuff in the works I think it would be great to wait
till then. But if you want to release then go ahead ;)
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
---------------------------------------------------
Murphy's law - "Anything that can go wrong, will."
(Actually, this is Finagle's law, which in itself
shows that Finagle was right.)
---------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>