You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Thomas Mueller (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/10/15 16:21:36 UTC

[jira] Commented: (JCR-2786) Cluster sync not always done when calling session.refresh(..)

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921378#action_12921378 ] 

Thomas Mueller commented on JCR-2786:
-------------------------------------

The easiest solution is to call syncCount++ before calling journal.sync(), but I will also replace the volatile syncCount with AtomicInteger.

> Cluster sync not always done when calling session.refresh(..)
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-2786
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2786
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: clustering
>            Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>            Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>
> Session.refresh(..) is supposed to synchronize cluster changes, but this doesn't always happen, specially if the syncDelay is low. The reason is a wrong assumption in ClusterNode.sync: The code there to avoid duplicate sync calls doesn't always work as expected. The following algorithm is used:
>         int count = syncCount;
>         syncLock.acquire();
>         if (count == syncCount) {
>             journalSync();
>             syncCount++;
>         }
>         syncLock.release();
> The problem is that the background thread might be at the line "syncCount++" when Session.refresh(..) is called, so that the main thread believes journalSync was already called and thus doesn't call it.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.