You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Thomas Mueller (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/10/15 16:21:36 UTC
[jira] Commented: (JCR-2786) Cluster sync not always done when
calling session.refresh(..)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921378#action_12921378 ]
Thomas Mueller commented on JCR-2786:
-------------------------------------
The easiest solution is to call syncCount++ before calling journal.sync(), but I will also replace the volatile syncCount with AtomicInteger.
> Cluster sync not always done when calling session.refresh(..)
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JCR-2786
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2786
> Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: clustering
> Reporter: Thomas Mueller
> Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>
> Session.refresh(..) is supposed to synchronize cluster changes, but this doesn't always happen, specially if the syncDelay is low. The reason is a wrong assumption in ClusterNode.sync: The code there to avoid duplicate sync calls doesn't always work as expected. The following algorithm is used:
> int count = syncCount;
> syncLock.acquire();
> if (count == syncCount) {
> journalSync();
> syncCount++;
> }
> syncLock.release();
> The problem is that the background thread might be at the line "syncCount++" when Session.refresh(..) is called, so that the main thread believes journalSync was already called and thus doesn't call it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.