[classlib] TreeSet fields not private in java6 branch?

[Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>]

I noticed while doing the merge of trunk to java6 that the backingMap
field of TreeSet was not private in the java6 branch while it is private
in trunk.

Jimmy, I think you submitted the code that changed this in HARMONY-4124.
Why did you change the backingMap field to not be private (and similarly
why is the descendingSet field not private)?

I'm probably missing something but I couldn't see a reason for it so I
thought I'd ask before I forgot about it.

Regards,
 Mark.

Re: [classlib] TreeSet fields not private in java6 branch?

[Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>]

In message <5c...@mail.gmail.com>,
"Jimmy ,Jing Lv" writes:
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
>      Sorry for late response. I checked and find the backingMap can be
> private ( as well as another variable descendingSet). Will check in
> soon.

Jimmy,

Thanks for clarifying this with commit r904009.  I thought that was the
case but wanted to double check that I wasn't missing something.

Regards,
 Mark.

Re: [classlib] TreeSet fields not private in java6 branch?

["Jimmy,Jing Lv" <fi...@gmail.com>]

Hi Mark,

     Sorry for late response. I checked and find the backingMap can be
private ( as well as another variable descendingSet). Will check in soon.

2010/1/27 Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>

>
> I noticed while doing the merge of trunk to java6 that the backingMap
> field of TreeSet was not private in the java6 branch while it is private
> in trunk.
>
> Jimmy, I think you submitted the code that changed this in HARMONY-4124.
> Why did you change the backingMap field to not be private (and similarly
> why is the descendingSet field not private)?
>
> I'm probably missing something but I couldn't see a reason for it so I
> thought I'd ask before I forgot about it.
>
> Regards,
>  Mark.
>
>
>


-- 

Best Regards!

Jimmy, Jing Lv
China Software Development Lab, IBM