You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Vadim Gritsenko <vg...@hns.com> on 2001/08/21 00:16:17 UTC
Source intergace: release() or recycle()?
Cocooners,
Let's decide on this. Two opinions were expressed
(see Re: [PROPOSAL] Changing Source interface thread):
> It seems that calling this method is necessary. I am +1 on release()
> as the source is not recycled.
>
>Carsten
And:
> The Recyclable interface is for any object--not just components!
>
> Berin
I like Recyclable interface, so +1 to recycle() from me :)
Vadim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
RE: Source intergace: release() or recycle()?
Posted by Vadim Gritsenko <vg...@hns.com>.
Done. Every Source now is Recyclable.
Please do not forget to recycle() used sources to avoid environment pollution :)
Vadim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: giacomo [mailto:giacomo@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:53 PM
> To: Cocoon Developers
> Subject: Re: Source intergace: release() or recycle()?
>
>
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>
> > Cocooners,
> >
> > Let's decide on this. Two opinions were expressed
> > (see Re: [PROPOSAL] Changing Source interface thread):
> >
> > > It seems that calling this method is necessary. I am +1 on release()
> > > as the source is not recycled.
> > >
> > >Carsten
> >
> > And:
> >
> > > The Recyclable interface is for any object--not just components!
> > >
> > > Berin
> >
> > I like Recyclable interface, so +1 to recycle() from me :)
>
> I'm somwhow off from the head so I'm +0
>
> Giacomo
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Source intergace: release() or recycle()?
Posted by giacomo <gi...@apache.org>.
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> Cocooners,
>
> Let's decide on this. Two opinions were expressed
> (see Re: [PROPOSAL] Changing Source interface thread):
>
> > It seems that calling this method is necessary. I am +1 on release()
> > as the source is not recycled.
> >
> >Carsten
>
> And:
>
> > The Recyclable interface is for any object--not just components!
> >
> > Berin
>
> I like Recyclable interface, so +1 to recycle() from me :)
I'm somwhow off from the head so I'm +0
Giacomo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Naming and patterns
Posted by Laran Coates <la...@yahoo.com>.
I've been going over some old design patterns today and I noticed that the
new Monitor framework seems to conform to the Observer pattern. Also, the
Action seems to conform pretty well to the Command pattern.
Am I right about this?
How much is everyone using patterns in the design decisions?
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org