You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shindig.apache.org by Paul Lindner <pl...@hi5.com> on 2008/08/01 03:24:59 UTC
Re: [jira] Created: (SHINDIG-481) Use unique shindig namespace for values in gadgets.properties
What do people think about this proposal?
It would involve modifying the names used in gadget.properties and
@Named annotations.
On Jul 30, 2008, at 3:37 AM, Paul Lindner (JIRA) wrote:
> Use unique shindig namespace for values in gadgets.properties
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SHINDIG-481
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-481
> Project: Shindig
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Common Components (Java)
> Reporter: Paul Lindner
> Assignee: Paul Lindner
>
>
> By overriding DefaultGuiceModule I was able to replace the
> properties source with our common properties source.
>
> If this becomes common practice it would be preferable to namespace
> the names in gadgets.properties by adding a 'shindig.' prefix.
>
> For example
>
> http.cache.negativeCacheTtl
>
> becomes
>
> shindig.http.cache.negativeCacheTtl=30000
>
>
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
Paul Lindner
plindner@hi5.com
Re: [jira] Created: (SHINDIG-481) Use unique shindig namespace for
values in gadgets.properties
Posted by Cassie <do...@google.com>.
+1 from me.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@hi5.com> wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2008, at 6:29 PM, Kevin Brown wrote:
>
> It makes sense to me, though since they're strings it'll mean a bit of
>> find
>> and replace work. If you want to take care of it, though, I don't see any
>> big issues with it.
>>
>>
> Thanks, this will help with our integration at hi5 quite a bit.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@hi5.com> wrote:
>>
>> What do people think about this proposal?
>>>
>>> It would involve modifying the names used in gadget.properties and @Named
>>> annotations.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 30, 2008, at 3:37 AM, Paul Lindner (JIRA) wrote:
>>>
>>> Use unique shindig namespace for values in gadgets.properties
>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Key: SHINDIG-481
>>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-481
>>>> Project: Shindig
>>>> Issue Type: Improvement
>>>> Components: Common Components (Java)
>>>> Reporter: Paul Lindner
>>>> Assignee: Paul Lindner
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> By overriding DefaultGuiceModule I was able to replace the properties
>>>> source with our common properties source.
>>>>
>>>> If this becomes common practice it would be preferable to namespace the
>>>> names in gadgets.properties by adding a 'shindig.' prefix.
>>>>
>>>> For example
>>>>
>>>> http.cache.negativeCacheTtl
>>>>
>>>> becomes
>>>>
>>>> shindig.http.cache.negativeCacheTtl=30000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>>> -
>>>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Paul Lindner
>>> plindner@hi5.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> Paul Lindner
> plindner@hi5.com
>
>
>
>
Re: [jira] Created: (SHINDIG-481) Use unique shindig namespace for values in gadgets.properties
Posted by Paul Lindner <pl...@hi5.com>.
On Jul 31, 2008, at 6:29 PM, Kevin Brown wrote:
> It makes sense to me, though since they're strings it'll mean a bit
> of find
> and replace work. If you want to take care of it, though, I don't
> see any
> big issues with it.
>
Thanks, this will help with our integration at hi5 quite a bit.
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@hi5.com>
> wrote:
>
>> What do people think about this proposal?
>>
>> It would involve modifying the names used in gadget.properties and
>> @Named
>> annotations.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 30, 2008, at 3:37 AM, Paul Lindner (JIRA) wrote:
>>
>> Use unique shindig namespace for values in gadgets.properties
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Key: SHINDIG-481
>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-481
>>> Project: Shindig
>>> Issue Type: Improvement
>>> Components: Common Components (Java)
>>> Reporter: Paul Lindner
>>> Assignee: Paul Lindner
>>>
>>>
>>> By overriding DefaultGuiceModule I was able to replace the
>>> properties
>>> source with our common properties source.
>>>
>>> If this becomes common practice it would be preferable to
>>> namespace the
>>> names in gadgets.properties by adding a 'shindig.' prefix.
>>>
>>> For example
>>>
>>> http.cache.negativeCacheTtl
>>>
>>> becomes
>>>
>>> shindig.http.cache.negativeCacheTtl=30000
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>> -
>>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>>>
>>>
>> Paul Lindner
>> plindner@hi5.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
Paul Lindner
plindner@hi5.com
Re: [jira] Created: (SHINDIG-481) Use unique shindig namespace for values in gadgets.properties
Posted by Kevin Brown <et...@google.com>.
It makes sense to me, though since they're strings it'll mean a bit of find
and replace work. If you want to take care of it, though, I don't see any
big issues with it.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@hi5.com> wrote:
> What do people think about this proposal?
>
> It would involve modifying the names used in gadget.properties and @Named
> annotations.
>
>
>
> On Jul 30, 2008, at 3:37 AM, Paul Lindner (JIRA) wrote:
>
> Use unique shindig namespace for values in gadgets.properties
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Key: SHINDIG-481
>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-481
>> Project: Shindig
>> Issue Type: Improvement
>> Components: Common Components (Java)
>> Reporter: Paul Lindner
>> Assignee: Paul Lindner
>>
>>
>> By overriding DefaultGuiceModule I was able to replace the properties
>> source with our common properties source.
>>
>> If this becomes common practice it would be preferable to namespace the
>> names in gadgets.properties by adding a 'shindig.' prefix.
>>
>> For example
>>
>> http.cache.negativeCacheTtl
>>
>> becomes
>>
>> shindig.http.cache.negativeCacheTtl=30000
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> -
>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>>
>>
> Paul Lindner
> plindner@hi5.com
>
>
>
>