[jira] [Closed] (LEGAL-656) Application of Generative AI policy to dependencies

["Roman Shaposhnik (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Roman Shaposhnik closed LEGAL-656.
----------------------------------

> Application of Generative AI policy to dependencies
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-656
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-656
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Josh McKenzie
>            Priority: Major
>
> Our [Generative Tooling policy|https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html] is fairly clear about _code contributions_ to projects residing in the foundation but there seems to be a gap in terms of _dependencies_ we bring into a project that, while permissively licensed, may themselves contain code generated by AI tooling and thus in legal gray space.
> [Email thread|https://lists.apache.org/thread/zkqg7mk9hp35zn0cf1tvywc2m3l63jrn] on cassandra dev list where this came up.
> I've read through LEGAL-631 and LEGAL-580, as well as double-checked our [3rd party license policy,|https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#asf-3rd-party-license-policy] and gone so far as to read through [The Open Source Definition|https://opensource.org/definition-annotated/] to see if there's anything to be gleaned there. Nothing is immediately clear to my non-lawyer eyes.
> Could we get some guidance from legal on this?
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org